Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Discourages Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:36 PM
Original message
Dean Discourages Nader
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 03:45 PM by demdem
Yesterday many people scoffed at the idea that Dean should say anything about Nader, turns out Dean did the mature and right thing.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=379569&mesg_id=379569

Ralph Nader has made many great contributions to America over 40 years. But if George W. Bush is re-elected, the health, safety, consumer, environmental, and open government provisions Ralph Nader has fought for will be undermined. George Bush's right-wing appointees will still be serving as judges fifty years from now, and our Constitution will be shredded. It will be government by, of, and for, the corporations - exactly what Ralph Nader has struggled against.

Those who truly want America's leaders to stand up to the corporate special interests and build a better country for working people should recognize that, in 2004, a vote for Ralph Nader is, plain and simple, a vote to re-elect George W. Bush. I hope that Ralph Nader will withdraw his candidacy in the best interests of the country we hope to become.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing wrong with repeating this again and again
a vote for Ralph Nader is, plain and simple, a vote to re-elect George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nothing wrong with repeating this either
Keep pushing for election reform. It won't help in this election, but it can save us from future repeats of 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Election reform won't work
We need system reform. Until Congress is more amenable to third parties, none of them will ever work. Until third parties are viable, someone is always going to get screwed in these Nader situations. We really need for there to be at least 4 major parties in this country in order to adequately reflect the spectrum of beliefs in our country, but you slit your own throat under the current system by straying from the 2 major parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. My 2 cents on Nader
If Nader does what he said he will do, and that is go after Bush. Then this will be a plus for the dems. I believe Nader will keep his campaign going to the last minute and then endorse the Democratic candidate. This is actually a good way for Dems to beat up on Bush via Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. In this case, I'm glad Dean supporters are "non-transferable"
We need Dean's supporters to voter Dem, and not go to Nader. I've been fearing this prospect for months, but it's much more likely to happen with DK's supporters than Dean's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Not me!
I believe in voting with my heart during the primary and voting with my head in the general election. Come March 2 I will be voting for Dennis Kucinich. Come November 2 it will be the Democratic nominee.

I learned my lesson in 2000; Ralph Nader doesn't even come into the equation. I won't vote for Nader until Congress makes IRV the law of the land. This will not happen by putting one man into an elective office, even if it is the President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Hey!
This Kucinich voter doesn't want to touch Nader with a ten-foot pole in November, thank you very much. This election is a binary proposition: Bush wins or Bush loses. Besides, where's Ralph been for the last three years? Working on third-party legitimacy issues? Working for systemic reform? Working on a single god damn thing? Or has he made himself scarce? By ducking out of the process and out of the public eye until campaign time rolled around again, he's lost all credibility with me. Furthermore, since he's running as an independent, votes for him won't help electorally validate the Green Party, which was a compelling reason to vote for him in '00. There's no reason whatsoever to vote Nader in '04 - the only "message" you send in doing so is "I'm a horse's ass who doesn't understand the real-world consequences of my actions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good for Dean
I knew he would do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Just what I was going to say. Thanks. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you Dean.
I really don't know what to make of Nader anymore. He seems to be shooting his own causes in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Does he have causes?
Outside of his own ego, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just talked to a RW acquantance who said...
... that Nader could help the Dem nominee. Said that Nader's message may appeal to the hard-core left, but the Democratic primaries made clear this is a small consituency and many of them will hold their noses and vote for Kerry (or whoever) anyway. Said that having Nader around could benefit Kerry further by making him look moderate, just like Dean did during the early nomination contests.

Could be. Who knows. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Could Nader make Kerry look "moderate"?
Maybe. Some people think that Henry Wallace's Left-wing candidacy in 1948 did just that for Harry Truman, as did the Dixecrat defection from Strom Thurmond. The Democrats were able to lift the weight of the racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. What Noam CHomsky says about voting 3rd party
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 04:05 PM by sangh0
In a recent interview, referring to this year's presidential race, Noam Chomsky pointed out:

The current incumbents may do severe, perhaps irreparable, damage if given another hold on power—a very slim hold, but one they will use to achieve very ugly and dangerous ends. In a very powerful state, small differences may translate into very substantial effects on the victims, at home and abroad. It is no favor to those who are suffering, and may face much worse ahead, to overlook these facts. Keeping the Bush circle out means holding one's nose and voting for some Democrat, but that's not the end of the story. The basic culture and institutions of a democratic society have to be constructed, in part reconstructed, and defeat of an extremely dangerous clique in the presidential race is only one very small component of that.

From www.tompaine.com -- Click on "Nader's Tin Ear"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. WOW. That makes my day
If Chomsky, CHOMSKY, of all people who many American Leftists absolutely adore, says vote for a Democrat I feel much better that Nader's candidacy will not amount to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. I never planned on voting for Nader, but I won't donate to a pro-war
Dem either, especially if it is "have my cake and eat it to" Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jansu Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Vote for Dean! Show Nader that he does not have a hope of our Vote!
Dean wants us to vote for him still! He did not withdraw, so all this talk of us going over to Nader or with anyone else, is wishful thinking. But, let's make sure that Nader knows he is NOT our alternative candidate. Whomever all of the voters in the Primaries decide is our Nominee, at the Convention, is OUR CANDIDATE! Most of us will work hard, give money and do whatever it takes to get OUR DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE elected as President. But, until the Convention, please, let us vote our choice! Support our right to our choice, in the Primary season. We will be supporting whomever wins at the Convention and in the General Election, whole heartedly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sounds like a fair compromise to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good for you Guv. We all think you and Judy are good folk.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 04:52 PM by WiseMen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC