Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Correct Hillary Clinton Stereotype- Bedrock Competence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:04 AM
Original message
The Correct Hillary Clinton Stereotype- Bedrock Competence
In their appraisals of Hillary Clinton, the pollsters and pundits who have not gotten beyond that mommy/ball-buster teeter-totter narrative of American womanhood also have not begun to diagnose gender dynamics beyond the perspective of the little boy and his mom. A lot of female voters, however, may be factoring in a whole other kind of female archetype, whose wet eyes do not signal weakness and whose flashes of anger do not signal coldness, only pragmatic perseverance.

If pundits ever tried to understand what some female voters know about the complexity of women's lives, they might begin to comprehend the appeal of a female candidate whose ethic of caring and whose posture of femininity derive from responsibilities beyond the maternal. And then they might begin to understand the affection of women in New Hampshire who put her over the top.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-faludi15jan15,0,7874707.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is exactly
my view of Senator Clinton

thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Your Welcome
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't speak on womans behalf for the simple fact I am not one but.
I will say this, pollsters and pundits are going to be wiping egg off their faces just like they did in N.H. this whole primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denidem Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is so right on...
Fabulous. Faludi really understands. This is what I see in Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. As A Male Who Was A Feminist Before Feminism Was Cool I Agree
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. I love Susan Faludi
Backlash is one of the best books ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Agree and agree. What a spectacular article. K & R!
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks DSB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. At what?n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Political Idolatry
Love is blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hillary Is The Filial Daughter And The Good Mom
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm having difficulty relating those references to Hillary
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. She Did A Nice Job With Chelsea And Takes Care Of Her 88 Year Old Mom In Her DC Home
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:24 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Too bad that maternal instinct failed so many grieving Iraqi and US military families
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. You Suggested She Was A Poor Mom And Daughter
I easily, easily defeated the silly notion

Since you are so fond of emoticons:


:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I didn't suggest anything of the kind
I'm sure she's been as good a mom/daughter as anyone in her position can be. The OP attempts to capitalize on the notion that the country needs a can-do mother, I agree, but Hillary isn't running for president of her family, she's running for president of the US. The author's analogy falls apart when considering Hillary's hawkish positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Actally, the article explains why the "can-do mother" analogy is flawed.
:shrug: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Maybe, but "caring" is a touchstone of the article
The next president's care must extend past the walls of their home, past the borders of this country, and embrace the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. suggesting Hillary is not competent?
absurd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. Hillary kept her family together (during and after Bills problem)- That took courage-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. There are times in a nation's history when competence is the highest ideal
and there other times when the path the country is on is so radically wrong that competence alone is not enough, when leadership and vision are significantly more important. This is not the time to tinker with the machine, this is a period in our history when the machine needs to be disassembled and rebuilt. It has been necessary before and it is necessary now. Senator Clinton is not the person for that job. She is part of the problem, not the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Did You Read The Editorial?
I think you and Ms. Faludi are approaching the issue of competence from very different vantage points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. no one's going to disassemble and rebuild the machine
you have absolutely NO EXCUSE for beliveing that either Obama or Edwards is in any way radical, and I don't believe you really do believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. attaboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. I was about to post this great analysis. Thanks DSB
Susan Faludi gets it right and finally we see a reporter willing to look beyond the MSM standard messaging.

The media, punditry and pollsters have been viewing this historic female candidacy, and the candidate herself, through the Madonna-Medea prism they've applied since at least the Victorian era to women who venture into American public life. In so doing, they have ignored a whole other model of womanhood that is central to female experience. If they are determined to think of Hillary Clinton in stereotypical female terms, at least they should get the stereotype right.

That ignorance was on prominent display after New Hampshire, as analysts groped to explain the primary results and came up with explanations that were as offensive as they were phantasmagorial. One theory, admittedly far-fetched but avidly promulgated, held that Clinton's unexpected surge of support came from lower-class voters who were secretly (that is, un-poll-ably) racist. Some pundits acknowledged that there might be a gender dynamic at work but allowed for only one possibility: Female voters were easily manipulated saps who'd let a few girl tears muddle their political sense. Pundits debated whether Clinton's tears were "real" or "manufactured" -- that is, whether she was some weak sob sister who couldn't hack the rough-and-tumble of a man's world, or just a power-grabbing witch who would do anything to hang on to her broomstick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillTheGoober Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wow.
Very nice.

That has to be the best thing I've read in a while.

Wow.

W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. one of the most interesting things I've read in a while
k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Competent at what? Getting healthcare passed? I mean, she wouldn't
listen to members of the Senate who explained to her how it could be passed. She completely BLEW IT, and I just don't think she has changed all that much.

I suppose she is competent at being elected to the U.S. Senate. But I don't find her safe Senate record particularly impressive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. Wow! A few in the media know the secret!
"
A few, such as San Francisco Chronicle reporter Carla Marinucci, offered more cogent appraisals. She pointed out that female voters didn't seem to be responding to Clinton's tears so much as to their outrage at men's reactions to those tears (in particular, men in the media).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Thanks for posting.
I admire Susan and am glad she is adding to the conversation. If more women had a voice we would be watching a very different contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. How inspiring...bedrock competence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I Agree...Competence Is Superfluous To Any Endeavor
Not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bedrock competence? Mussolini made the trains run on time
but that's not what we need. What we need is not a technocrat that will wage war in Iraq and Iran more competently than Bush, what we need is a leader that will TURN THIS WAR OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I Can See Another Person Comments Without Reading The Article
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. and you supported Joe Biden in the primaries
the quintessential competent technocrat. (which is why I like him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
32. I love the examples at the beginning of the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. exactly how i feel about Senator Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. The correct Hillary Clinton stereotype:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
41. If "Competence" won elections...
John Kerry would be now be President.

Al Gore would have won by a landslide in 2000.

Walter Mondale would have beat Reagan like a grape in 1984.

"Competence" does not inspire voters-- it merely gives them a reason to not vote for your opponent, and does NOT motivate them to get to the polls and bring others to the polls.

JFK didn't win on "competence" in 1960-- Nixon was far more competent than him. He won because he had a VISION for a better country, a vision for a nation that could be greater than it was. He INSPIRED people to vote for him because they shared his dream.

"Competence" may keep you in the race. INSPIRATION makes sure you win it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
42. That article explains why I support Clinton
I have personally seen what her competence and perseverance has accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC