Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DUer Question?? Who were the original core backers of Obama for Pres.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:19 AM
Original message
DUer Question?? Who were the original core backers of Obama for Pres.
Skeptic that I am, I am curious if anyone knows how Obama originated his run for President.
I watched a show about how Bush was literally chosen for the GOP ticket in 99-2000. Sec Schulz was speaking about how a core group got together to choose a candidate and he brought up George Bush's name as the best person for the job. Of course that was perhaps as a favor to Bush Sr., after his loss to Bill Clinton, thus interrupting the Bush plan for their new world order.

Just curious if Obama was chosen by a think-tank group like Bush was. If so, who approached him with the idea.
I don't believe one person decides one fine day that they will run for Pres. I believe they are chosen or supported by a certain group. Who originated the Obama run for U.S. President?
Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Phizer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. lol..well that's a start. Perhaps you are right...I
think it is a smart voter who knows how the candidates were chosen to 'run' in the first place.
I say this after hearing Schulz talk of their selection of George jr.
We well know of Hillary & Edwards by now, but Obama is a newcomer to the field, and this has my curiosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Antoni "Tony" Rezko
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. GEORGE SOROS!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
:rofl: at any lurking Freepers going "Aha! O'Reilly was right!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. you may see some of the usual suspects here?
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 11:24 AM by AZDemDist6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Some funny stuff in there.
a slick, seasoned "natural" politician, already toeing the DLC/RNC line. Corporate America has giving him their stamp of approval; between that and his first few votes, I'm less than trusting of Senator Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess you are asking about some political machine more than think tank
I can tell you Dick Durbin and Tom Daschle both encouraged Obama to run. I doubt that constitutes a machine, but I am sure it doesn't mean Obama was "chosen" in the sense you are giving about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think after the convention speech in 2004
everyone with ears wanted the guy to run for president some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yup, just the speech.
Obama and Edwards are self made...no machines there.

Bill was self made...Hillary has a machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:30 AM
Original message
Are you sure?
I remember people around here being very impressed, but saying he's too new...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. obviously somebody wanted him to run
I'm sure a lot of people asked him to run this year.

Hell, I'm sure a lot of people were upset he wasn't the nominee in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oh yes, I know many speculated about it...
that's why he kept saying he wouldn't. Obviously he changed his mind along the way. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. i'm sure the thought
that you never know what the future holds probably made the decision easier.

Look at how guys like Dodd and Kucinich and Biden did after spending years and years in Congress. People get tired of you and you start to lose that luster you had when you were young and fresh.

Obama would lose a big part of his appeal if he stayed out of running for president for 8 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yeah, and also he'd have racked up so many more non-votes by then.
It'd be much harder to 'splain away by then.

;)

Sorry! You know I'm kidding around, I hope. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. yeah, I do
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Ah c'mon... I made a funny!
I feel like I deserve an award or somethin, that's so rare. :P :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dick Durbin was really key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Great Minds...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think Durbin helped some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yeah but I wouldn't say Durbin had a machine.
would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No....he doesn't
But it was not insturional black leaderhip and it certainly was not DLCers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. No....he doesn't
But it was not insturional black leaderhip and it certainly was not DLCers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. LOL next time I am in Madison...I will buy you a beer.
We think alot alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Rezco.
Yes, low blow. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Grassroot. Everywhere he was going in 2005 and 2006, people were asking him if he was going to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. But that doesn't translate to money
Obama had an enormous campaign fund right out of the gate. That's really unusual for someone who was so new to national politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Most of it coming from small individual donors. He has the largest numbers of individual donors.
He also inherited of some of Kerry's fundraisers, I know, but it was after he decided to run and that Kerry had dropped out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. He's also got a ton of corporate donors
And that's where the big money is. Which came first, the corporate donors or the individual donors? IMO the big bundled money had to come first to get national coverage of Obama's campaign, then ind. donations came from people who liked what they saw. But without the big backing, Obama would just be a Gravel or a Kucinich.

PACs and lobbyists aided Obama's rise
Data contrast with his theme

Boston Globe, August 9, 2007

"But behind Obama's campaign rhetoric about taking on special interests lies a more complicated truth. A Globe review of Obama's campaign finance records shows that he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from lobbyists and PACs as a state legislator in Illinois, a US senator, and a presidential aspirant.

In Obama's eight years in the Illinois Senate, from 1996 to 2004, almost two-thirds of the money he raised for his campaigns -- $296,000 of $461,000 -- came from PACs, corporate contributions, or unions, according to Illinois Board of Elections records. He tapped financial services firms, real estate developers, healthcare providers, oil companies, and many other corporate interests, the records show.

Obama's US Senate campaign committee, starting with his successful run in 2004, has collected $128,000 from lobbyists and $1.3 million from PACs, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit organization that tracks money in politics. His $1.3 million from PACs represents 8 percent of what he has raised overall. Clinton's Senate committee, by comparison, has raised $3 million from PACs, 4 percent of her total amount raised, the group said.

In addition, Obama's own federal PAC, Hopefund, took in $115,000 from 56 PACs in the 2005-2006 election cycle out of $4.4 million the PAC raised, according to CQ MoneyLine, which collects Federal Election Commission data. Obama then used those PAC contributions -- including thousands from defense contractors, law firms, and the securities and insurance industries -- to build support for his presidential run by making donations to Democratic Party organizations and candidates around the country."

-
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/08/09/pacs_and_lobbyists_aided_obamas_rise/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. What worries me is who they are beholden to in the event they are
elected. What comes first ..their desire to do the best to honor America & its Constitution or the 'base' that got them the Pres position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. You asked who was behind him. The answer is simple and even if you do not believe it, it is true.
People.

And I stopped trusting the Globe a long time ago. I will not trust them today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Why not?
I thought the Boston Globe was a pretty liberal paper? And yeah, Obama's got people - a lot of those people are lobbyists & real estate developers (Rezco). Obama's original backing was the Chicago machine, then PACS, then individuals. Which is pretty typical, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yeah! Sure, I have to believe you and the globe who could not even defend Kerry during the SBVT
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 12:20 PM by Mass
campaign. Liberal, sure, as long as you do not have to stand for it,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Don't you have a basis for
your opinion? You said that you don't trust the Boston Globe - I was wondering why that was. If they got a big story wrong, or favored Republicans, or something. Otherwise, why wouldn't you believe a reputable story from a reputable newspaper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
25. Makes sense, guess there's no dark & looming machine behind
Obama's Pres run. Just had to ask.
Shows how tainted I've become since the Bush crime family has revealed its true mission in our political system.
Thanks all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. here's a bit from my tinfoil hat:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2728863&mesg_id=2728863

Bush's "spiritual adviser endorses Obama" - "we share a common vision" W approves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Wish there was a Tinfoil News on msm.
All tinfoil all the time...tinfoil moderated..
Probably be good for this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. People
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. True, but people chose criminal Bush also..
My point in this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC