Why does EVERYTHING have to be a fucking WAR???

[Labors of Hercules]

First they set up the campaign "armies" and the "camps",
then they stake out the "battlefields"
They use "tactics" and "strategies" to win "Battles"

And all the while we dizzy and gullible voters try to discover the truth...

Here's a simple formula: If you sense the bombing is strategic: it is. If you think the deeds are dirty: they are. If you feel morally repulsed: You're obviously paying attention.

Don't believe ANYTHING one Candidate says about any other candidate until you have thoroughly researched it yourself.

Trust your own thinking and instincts, because no matter how bad they are, they will be a HELL of a lot better than ANYTHING else.

:rant: :yourock:

[bidenista]

1. do i detect an ENEMY WITHIN?!

[PDJane]

5. No.

[Captain Hilts]

2. Good guys, bad guys, winner, loser, beginning, end. It's very tidy. nt

[old guy]

3. I agree. Well stated.

[grantcart]

4. i can't figure that out either

[Hardrada]

6. CHAAAAARRRGE!!!!!!

[The Magistrate]

7. Not Bad, Sir

And one more thing to recall....

"A weapon is classed as offensive or defensive according to which end is nearest to you."

[stellanoir]

8. The war profiteers invest in both sides of the conflict and make beaucoup bucks

from arming both sides of the conflict. It's that simple.

At the heinous expense of the poor and the innocent.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

9. Have you seen this?

http://www.theonion.com/content/whitehousewar

America's Finest News Source. :)

[nancyharris]

10. and the first

casualty of war politics is "truth".

[zbdent]

11. Everything except what a Republiconvict would

send himself or his kid to ...