Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the big deal about Obama being endorsed by Kennedy and Kerry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:14 PM
Original message
What's the big deal about Obama being endorsed by Kennedy and Kerry?
They both had in the past either lost the endorsement of their own party or lost the unlosable election. It obviously hasn't done Clinton any harm. She won Florida over Obama 52% to 30%. I know that officially it doesn't count but it has to be a fairly accurate poll as to how the endorsements have effected her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. She got ZERO delegates in a state where no one but her campaigned. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yeah yeah--old news--and getting real boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Still ZERO! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. You'd better get on your knees and thank God she went
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 10:24 PM by neutron
Because if she hadn't we would have pre-lost an important state in the general election.
Your deep humbled apology not accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Oh please! The number of Floridians voting for and against Hillary was the same, and
again, no underhanded campaigning by her opponents. Still ZERO delegates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. If THATS the best she can do in a state with her age group...
she's going to get liquified in the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. No one campaigned in the Dem primary
You are right about zero delegates, but it is a symbolic victory, which she needed after South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. "symbolic victory" It's more like symbolic spin. No one knows how many people decided not to
vote because they knew it didn't matter. Hillary supporters I'm sure got word from her campaign to go vote. She still didn't get the black vote. '

All-in-all, this is just a desperate campaign spinning a silver lining after a crushing defeat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Why do his supporters love to lie..
RADIO AD AFTER RADIO AD WAS SPEWED ALL OVER FLORIDA BY THE OTHER CANDIDATE. HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA OR MICHIGAN.

And in Michigan -- conyers and his wife ran radio ads in support of the other candidate. Hillary won there also.

Now if HIllary campaigned in either state where the heck are the links to ANY THING FROM THE MSM showing she did. But there are plenty about the other candidate...but then they have to lie and twist it wouldn't be them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir2 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Obama campaigned there also, get it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Kennedy name has huge influence in the Dem Party
And Kerry was the last nominee. These are major endorsements that could change some minds before Super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. With who?
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 10:24 PM by MagsDem
Give me one scintilla of evidence that voters use endorsements to make up their minds. There is a reason they don't ask those questions in polls, you know. Because people couldn't care less about endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. yeah, cause Al Gore endorsment of Dean worked out so well
:Sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. that's what I'm saying.....
Endorsements make the endorser feel important and that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. personal enorsements may not matter much for any candidate really - just ego stroking nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are you always bashing Obama?
For someone who supposedly isn't even from this country, you sure seem to go out of your way to bash Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Aussie leftie? is that like a Bushie Normie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Bushie Normie? whats that?
Aussie leftie basically means that I'm Australian and that I'm on the socialist side of politics. Thats why I would have loved to have seen John Edwards do much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Whoever is chosen as President of the USA effects the rest of the world
I am not bashing Obama. I just feel that he is playing the victim. He may even make a very good president, but I feel more confident with either John Edwards or Hillary Clinton.

You have my permission to bash any politician from Australia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are the bedrock of the Democratic party.
Dismiss them if you like, but many people place a lot of weight in their endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Correction, its currently 50%-33%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. You know, I am SICK and TIRED of the bashing of Democrats
who endorse a candidate that wasn't the person's choice.

Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I am too
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't see how you could possibly judge Florida as a poll of anything...
...and 9 falls out of 10, endorsements are more valuable locally more than they are nationally. I would guess a good chunk of New England is now starting to lean in Obama's direction who wouldn't have done so before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Really? On what do you base that baloney?
Seriously, ever seen an exit poll, or ANY poll that asked how important an endorsement was? No. That's because everyone already knows they mean nothing. Voters don't pay attention to endorsments except in non-partisan elections where the candidate does not identify his/her party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Beats me... endorsements don't mean jack to me
Political junkies think for themselves, they don't base votes on endorsements. Non-political junkies don't even know the endorsement has been made, or likely don't care anyway. They are a big bunch of nothing in the scheme of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Endorsements like Kennedy and Kerry's mean a lot more than you think
They can be significant when it comes to fundraising and grassroots support.

They played by the rules so Florida is not a gauge of the potential of these endorsements. SC was!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't think Kerry helped in SC at all
Kennedy wouldn't have made much difference there either. SC was Obama's victory.

I think Kennedy will have some positive influence for Obama in MA.

In the general, Kennedy's endorsement will hurt more than help in Southern states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I think you are wrong. Especially about this:
"Kennedy's endorsement will hurt more than help in Southern states."

Here's why: I doubt the reason the Clintons tried to get these endorsements was because they believe it would turn people off.

Networks are valuable, and Kerry and Kennedy have them.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Have you ever witnessed a Southern election?
The word Liberal before a candidate's name is the kiss of death.

The word Kennedy Liberal is even more deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. That doesn't address the point in my response. Kerry campaigned for McCasskill and she won. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. let me explain it this way If it weren't important
the Clintons wouldn't have begged Teddy not to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. the only one i cared about was
tom hayden`s endorsement of barrack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. Money for one. Puts their fundraisers, donor lists, connections in service of endorsed candidate.
It's not just a PR or symbolic gesture by the endorser, although that's the public element of the endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. It did make some difference to me.
I'm still fence-sitting and leaning one way then the other, but the event with the Kennedys was quite profound to me. I put a lot of faith in their understanding (especially Ted) of the inner workings of the party, and it really made me stop and wonder. I guess time will tell how other voters respond. I'm still not sure who I'm going to vote for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I Agree With This
I was also incredibly moved by the rally with the Kennedys and Obama; it was very impressive and inspiring to me, too. When C-SPAN replayed it later that night, I taped it. I am old enough to have a real reverence for the entire extended Kennedy family and all that it has done for generations, as people also do for the Roosevelts--this is the soul and meaning of our Party, and country. The rousing speeches, with all the old Kennedy magic, cheering crowd, familiar phrases, such as "the New Frontier," and Obama, very movingly, appearing to be totally aware of what was happening here, the meaning of it, being lofted up to a higher level of political history and consciousness, and understanding the greatness of the people who were doing the endorsing here.

Understand the events of the past several days: first, after a growing list of endorsements by individuals and newspapers, etc., the New York Times, one of the great newspapers, endorsed Hillary Clinton--a coup--then suddenly, before the dust even settled, Caroline Kennedy, who has become a great writer (on the right of privacy, on Christmas tradition, etc.) and director of events and forums at the JFK Library, writes an op-ed piece, endorsing Obama. Just after that, Ted Kennedy, one of the greatest, most effective Senators ever, endorses Obama--the biggest, most impressive name yet for Obama. It was just a stunning series of events, and quick.

Ted Kennedy's speech at this event was so exciting, with references to the feeling of waves of change, history, and Obama referring to Pres. Kennedy's "torch has been passed to a new generation" after Ted Kennedy's deeply moving story, about how it had been once Sen. Kennedy, being called "inexperienced" by former Pres. Truman. It all added up to a fabulous, very complicated and rich (for those aware of the history) atmosphere, and raised everything to that organized, family Kennedy class. Also, I think Ted Kennedy had to suffer for many years as the "D"LC Clinton/Edwards/Kerry types pretended to be rid of the great old New Deal/liberal/union/women's-and-civil-rights wing of the Party, as represented by Kennedy, etc. Kennedy's dream of true universal health care was thwarted by Bill Clinton as much as by Republicans. It was like our true tradition--Kennedys and Roosevelts and taking care of the poor and abused--was back, returned to life, after all the bleak years of Republican "D"LC, etc. It was very wonderful, to live again.

Of course, Obama is not up to the proven standards of these families that have been great for generations, and I will vote for either candidate, no matter who it is, but this event with the Kennedys just had the exhilirating feel of the irresistable wave of history and right. If you have the respect for these people that educated Democrats who grew up knowing that they were heroes did, then the whole thing was just alive with meaning and background. It was a very major endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
38. Kennedy and Kerry
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 AM by ArkySue
are the epitome of "the old politics of the past," the status quo, the Washington elite. Isn't that what Obama is running to get rid of???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC