Here is an interesting take from a security analyst according to the well-respected Steven Clemons on his site The Washington Note.
"I just had an interesting meeting with a prominent and thoughtful national security expert in Washington. I can't go into any of the details of the meeting, but I am intrigued with the calculation that at least one serious, non-ideological pragmatist in foreign policy is making.
This person's sense is that John McCain and Hillary Clinton would both be the wrong choices for the country. McCain, he/she said, does not have the temperament for the presidency -- and doesn't listen to others and thinks he has most of the answers.
Hillary Clinton too, this person said, brings a group of retainers and pols who think they've done it all before -- and don't understand that tomorrow's challenges are more serious and more complex than any of us have perhaps seen in our lifetimes. According to this policy intellectual, Hillary Clinton's experience led her to affirm the Kyl/Lieberman IRGC amendment, which could have very well been a loophole for another war.
This commentator -- who would not go on the record -- believes that both McCain and Clinton are almost looking for a fight, a contest of wills internationally, to establish their bona fides as strong national security presidents."
The analyst went on to say that he thought Obama seems to be a better listener and thoughtful in dealing with complexities.
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/Scroll down to the headline "Where Some Of The Serious Realists Are Heading."
He is strong on civil rights for all. Remember he taught constitutional law.
He received an endorsement just today from a gay organization
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4311463