Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"IWR was the right vote under a NORMAL president but not under this shithead" is the best position

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Original message
"IWR was the right vote under a NORMAL president but not under this shithead" is the best position
for a Democrat to take into the GE. I'm glad Clinton stuck to her guns on that one and does not apologize outright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone knew what this vote meant...even Hillary
Truly she did. Everyone knew we were going to war from the moment that vote was cast. Hillary CLEARLY did as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Kerry? Edwards? No they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Did you read the bill? Did you debate the issue on the Senate floor?
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 - Expresses support for the President's efforts to: (1) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and (2) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion, and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.

Authorizes the President to use the U.S. armed forces to: (1) defend U.S. national security against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. Directs the President, prior to or as soon as possible (but no later than 48 hours) after exercising such authority, to make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that: (1) reliance on further diplomatic or peaceful means alone will not achieve the above purposes; and (2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization for use of the armed forces, consistent with requirements of the War Powers Resolution.

Requires the President to report to Congress at least every 60 days on matters relevant to this resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not if you know what Chaffee knew
and that's that the intelligence was hoaky. He said the scary aluminum tubes looked like something that could be bought at the hardware store. He voted no.

This intelligence was trumped up and of all people, Hillary Clinton should have known it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. And Levin and Biden...
She can't claim that nobody else knew what was going on and tried to clue her in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. It's pretty ridiculous to take her response seriously
I really had a hard time stomaching her response about how "serious" the threat was, especially given the multitude of people who were shouting as loudly as they could that something was amiss.

Sorry, Hillary supporters, I don't buy that excuse. She's going to have to denounce it completely before I consider her any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well then, I guess you won't be considering her further...
She'll never admit it was a mistake. She almost can't admit that it was a mistake now. The window has passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Its going to be tough if I'm faced with that decision
I fully intend to vote for the nominee, but I certainly won't feel good about it if she's the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. She can't go back and her getting down on her knees seems to be the
only thing that will satisfy so many at this point. How would it look if she graffed at this point?? good fodder for the RW pundits.
It serves no ones purpose at this time for her to apologize--except those who want to see her gravel in the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know WHY the IWR is Hillary's achilles heel?
She claims experience from being the President's wife, and most of the WMD "evidence" Bush was lying about was from her own husband's administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. its folks like you that make it her achilles heel. but you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, there wouldn't have been an IWR under a normal president. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Clinton gave other examples of the same thing in the debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. She should have said just that rather than piling up
that heap of eye-glazing nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. She should have said, "Had I known then what I know about Bush's character and honesty, I'd never...
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 10:43 PM by DinoBoy
...have voted yes."

ON EDIT: Even more bluntly: "Had I known then what I know now: that President Bush is a lying sack of shit so dishonest that I wouldn't trust him to pee in the toilet, I'd never have voted..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. You're right. She puts it too politely but maybe needs to say it your way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. then we would hear the kerry flip flop meme from the RW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Um...no
Bad vote under any circumstance, as the reasoning behind it consisted largely of outright falsehood (chemical weapons, support of Al Qaeda, etc). No competent or honourable administration would have introduced such a resolution to Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good lord. I knew Bush was a lying sack of shit and I'm just a minion.
Hillary said she "talked to people she trusted in the WH" before voting. Very poor judgement and I can't trust her to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. She knew. She has mentioned several times that she sought...
...personal assurance from Bush & co. that they would try diplomacy.

Why ask for personal assurance on several occasions unless you suspect that something is amiss?

And if you suspect that something is amiss, why not vote for the Levin Amendment to maintain some control over the situation?

Sorry, but none of the explanations she's offered so far are believable, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. She GOT personal assurance from the fucking liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah, but she voted against the one thing that could've held them to their word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. BS! 23 Senators knew better than that! Wellstone knew better than that!
Sorry, he was my home state senator, and the standard I hold most Senators to.

There was no excuse for voting for the IWR and nearly a quarter of the Senate didn't.

It was terrible, horrendous judgment, and thousands upon thousands of people DIED for it. Don't minimize their deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Exactly, and the Levin Amendment would've provided her insurance...
...just in case those other Senators were right about Bush and she was wrong.

But she was more interested in getting reelected and being perceived as tough on terrorism.

And that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. War with Iraq would *always* have been the wrong vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. the best position
is why are we going into Iraq when Al Qaeda is still running around in Afghanistan???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. whow--that is a beautiful way to phase it. yes yes--send it to HILL. and i do not think
she should apologize at this point either. It would give the RW too much fodder. they are waiting for her to get down on her knees.--some here on Du are waiting also. They can't get past that moment in their minds.


..........

for a Democrat to take into the GE. I'm glad Clinton stuck to her guns on that one and does not apologize outright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. HRC Cannot be Trusted on Iraq
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 11:15 PM by arewenotdemo
Interesting read. She likes her data from all the (obviously) wrong sources, but parrots it pretty well.

http://www.alternet.org/audits/70416/?page=entire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Clinton shouldn't stick to her guns on this though
There's no ammo there. And when she gets called upon to face off vs the Republican nominee, we all lose then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC