Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton Prevaricates on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:06 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton Prevaricates on Iraq
Her vote was indefensible and she knows it so she lies about it. The truth is she was trying to cover herself in anticipation of running for president. She thought voting against the IWR would hurt her in the general election. She was wrong, voting FOR it hurt her, but she didn't know that then. Her vote was both incredibly calculating and a complete MIScalculation. That's why her answers on it now make no sense. She is not telling the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone knew that if given the authorization Bush would shock and awe Iraq.
If she didn't know she's stupid and we know she's not stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. If you really think that, we need jail cells for Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Dodd...
if they truly "knew" that, as you describe, no amount of "I'm sorry" should keep them out of the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Clinton is going to clean up all the messes
by sweeping all illegality under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those are all reasons - right or wrong - but no lies,,,,,nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LIES. She knew it was to authorize the war.
But she can't give the real reason, that it was a political calculation to help her in this race, so she lies and says she believed Bush. Give me a break. We all knew what that vote meant. So did she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq".
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 11:18 PM by godai
Seems, from the title, pretty clear what was being authorized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's why she makes no sense when asked that question.
She doesn't HAVE an answer. She CAN'T tell the truth on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, but where is the lie? Post the words that are a lie.
You may think she gave reasons that are wrong but they are not lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Stop Hannity-ing this. A lie is in the intent. Have you read the USSC...
decision regarding Larry Flynt when he was sued by Falwell for defamation, over those cartoons in HUSTLER that said Falwell's first sexual experience was with his mother in an outhouse? Flynt WON that case because the USSC said that "the bar lies in this, would a reasonable person think that Jerry Falwell actually had sex with his own mother in an outhouse?" If not, then its satire and not a basis for defamation.

The SAME holds for Hillary and her war vote. Spin it any way you want, but would any REASONABLE, SENSIBLE person think that Bush would not invade and occupy Iraq given the Congressional approval to do it?

OF COURSE NOT.

What else you got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. EVERY excuse that she gives is a lie because the TRUTH is she voted to protect herself.
It's ALL lies, every time she doesn't admit the truth on this question she is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Ah, you didn't read her vote speech, eh?
"My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of pre-emption, or for uni-lateralism, or for the arrogance of American power or purpose -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people throughout the world.

*******

So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President and we say to him - use these powers wisely and as a last resort. And it is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein - this is your last chance - disarm or be disarmed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's disingenuous. It''s pure CYA.
She knew exactly what Bush was going to do with that power. We all knew. They had been planning it from the minute they took office. It's well documented. Was she stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sure is. And THAT'S how she would govern.
It says a mouthfull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. And her line about "coercive diplomacy" has me a little concerned
whatever she meant by it. I hope she's asked to amplify on what she means at the next debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC