Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The truth comes out about Obama Kennedy endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:24 AM
Original message
The truth comes out about Obama Kennedy endorsement
Turns out Bill and Ted had a big argument about the MLK statement. He thought JFK should have got credit instead of Johnson. Man, the fucking EGOS of politicians. And sorry, but Ted is smoking something if he thinks JFK should get credit. His bro didn't have the balls or the political capital to get it through congress, and he refused to put the hammer down on his own party to get it done. History is VERY clear on that fact from every source that recounts it -- I guess except in Teddy land.

But ain't that something.... it isn't that Ted thinks Obama is so fucking fantastic -- he just got in a pissing contest with Bill. LOL -- what an egotist.

And P.S. - if Obama says, one more time, he didn't vote for the war and Hillary did, without mentioning he wasn't fucking elected at the time and wasn't asked to vote, I think I will take out a frigging billboard to let people know. And Hillary is being way too nice without responding, each and every time, you weren't in a position to vote, and since you have been you have voted the same way I have EVERY TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, that only pushed Teddy's hand. It was already in play, it was the timing in question.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM by Kittycat

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Of course.
The idea that Kennedy would make this decision solely based on an argument is beyond silly. Clearly, Teddy and Caroline did lots of soul-searching and thinking before deciding to dedicate themselves to Obama's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
72. Did they?
and your evidence is.... where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
63. I said all along it was a dynastical argument. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
87. maybe it was this: Clinton aid makes crack about assassination
Clinton aid makes crack about assassination

The first was at an event in Dover, N.H., at which Clinton supporter Francine Torge introduced the former first lady saying, "Some people compare one of the other candidates to John F. Kennedy. But he was assassinated. And Lyndon Baines Johnson was the one who actually" signed the civil rights bill into law.

The Kennedy insider says Senator Kennedy was deeply offended that Clinton remained silent and "sat passively by" rather than correcting the record on his slain brother's civil rights record.

Kennedy was also apparently upset that Clinton said on the same day: "Dr. King's dream began to be realized when President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Ac. It took a president to get it done."

http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2008/01/clinton-aid-makes-crack-about.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
90. Hillary's Senate Seat is special, JFK Jr was going to run for it
So Hillary gets the seat, and what does she do? She twists around the legacy of the civil rights movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM
Original message
kick
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:30 AM by AX10
links?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. "His bro didn't have the balls"? WTF? Kennedy endorsed Obama
That will not change!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Try reading it again....
JFK did not have the balls to push the civil rights bill through congress, nor the political capital. That was because he was very young and inexperienced, and was elected based on a media fairy tale of camelot. Kind of like Obama. :) In fact, almost exactly like Obama.

But in any case, Teddy was mad that the Clinton's credited Johnson with getting it passed (the truth) instead of JFK who wanted it passed, but couldn't get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Getting killed kind of got in his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
38. If you think shitting on the graves of MLK and JFK in order to defend HRC's LBJ comment...
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 AM by JVS
is A-OK, then your logic is FUBAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. Sorry, it's the historical truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maq-az Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
42. JFK, MLK, or LBJ
Nope, it was courageous Woman who had the balls to sit down on the front set of that bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #42
49. That's very true
But the myths these people believe are purely out of ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
55. Amen to that.
Rosa Parks is one of my boy's hero. He even has a poster of her. He thinks she was one awesome women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #42
65. I really like that. JFK, MLK, and LBJ all played a role in this.
Is't there enough credit to go around. Why would Ted be that small. JFK proposed civil rights legislation and LBJ fought like hell to get it passed. We all know what MLK did. LBJ lost all of his political clout over the civil rights legislation. He called in all his "chips." And he gave JFK credit for his vision and MLK for his work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NursesluvHillary Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #65
97. RFK did his part as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
43. Bobby Kennedy Civil Rights Leader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #43
95. *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. You wouldn't have any sort of cite for that tidbit, perchance?
It sounds logical. And JFK WAS dragging his feet with MLK, make no mistake. LBJ, though, hopped right on it--you can go to the tapes at the LBJ library and hear the two of them talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Keith Olberman - can catch the rerun
I'm sure you will enjoy it as much as I did. It makes perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. It totally rings true--and I have to say I am unsurprised.
A bit disappointed in Ted, but I suppose we have to make allowances, as he's old.

I hear from one of his office workers that he's getting an EARFUL from Bay Staters over the endorsement. They don't "need" or "want" his help in making their choice, thanks anyway, Teddy.

Kerry is getting the same feedback, as well, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama's autobiographical "truths" will be outed by Rove and Co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary's collegues in the senate had the same information and MANY voted no.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:28 AM by Windy
Hillary made a mistake. She used poor judgment. She looked at the same data that all other senators did. She chose to vote Yes...many chose no.

and it is a very good point that the title of the measure voted on was:


Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html

for her to say that she wasn't voting to use force is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. Many voted no? How many? 77 voted yes. 28 Democrats - do the math....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Kennedy Foundation brought over Obama's father from Kenya also....
and Teddy has been sort of a mentor to Barak - that doesn't hurt either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is all this bitterness necessary? Tonight is a happy night
Selections aren't until Tuesday. Relax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Dear Truth hurts a lot.....
er, um, the truth does hurt a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Cite? Or is this news report courtesy of your ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Keith Olberman - I'm sure you can catch the rerun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. So one anonymous source said that was part of the decision. Well, I'm convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. You've apparently never met Ted Kennedy - lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think this is crap.
Provide a source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Keith Olberman - I'm sure you can catch the rerun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. The commentator never said that...
Kennedy's call with Bill was the sole reason for Ted's endorsement. He did say that Kennedy's angry tone at the Barack/Caroline event was probably fueled by the argument with Bill. The implied message was that Kennedy was supporting Barack in the first place - that's why he was calling Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. LOL -- bullshit
Yes, Teddy called him, because he was pissed, and he wanted to let Bill know he was going to kneecap Hillary as a result. Egos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. Your choice of words reveals the "quality" of your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #52
66. What, you think no one in politics says "bullshit"?
And I'm the one that doesn't know "real" politics?! LOL! Have a nice evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama is on record at the time saying that he agreed with Durbin
and wouldn't have voted for the AOF bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Who cares, he didn't have to....
And based on his record in the state senate, and the US senate, it's pretty clear he would have ducked it instead of voting one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
94. He is ON RECORD saying that he would vote with Dick Durbin
You can cry about this if you like. Facts are facts.

The "Present" controversy really is a tempest in a teapot. It was not ducking votes. I'm surprised anybody here at DU has swallowed that line of bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Respond with what?
What is she going to say? No, he didn't have to vote for it. But he was running for the senate at the time, and it was not a popular position, but still he did the "politically UNWISE" thing to do, and he spoke out against it.

What is she supposed to respond with? She was wrong. And everyone knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. As I said, she should respond with...
Gee, Barack, you weren't in office then. In fact, you are a junior senator with less than 3 yrs experience under your belt. So YOU didn't have to vote for it one way or the other. And judging on your history, you very well might have dodged voting on it at all. And SINCE you have been in office, your voting record is exactly identical to mine, when you've had the courage to actually record a vote other than "present."

She could make him look like the complete full of crap wussy he is. She is much too nice to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. Here's a link on this story, courtesy of another DUer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. Voting to continue funding the troops is markedly different ...
... than voting to put the troops into harm's way, unnecessarily. As Obama stated tonight, "we need to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in."

Hillary voted to use force in Iraq. Obama, like Al Gore and Howard Dean, was against the war from its inception. The leadership and judgement shown by these Democrats is not diminished one iota by their not being in a position to cast a vote on the resolution to use force against Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Except he has a history of dodging difficult votes...
The last one being the Kyl Lieberman / Iran vote. He has a consistent pattern of ducking difficult votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. And now we return to our regularly scheduled programming.
Rather than diverting to hypotheticals, deal with the reality of Hillary's Iraq resolution vote and Obama's outspoken opposition to the war.

Can we agree that Obama's position was correct, and Hillary's was wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #48
56. No, I don't agree that Obama's position is correct
I think if he has been against it since the beginning there is no reason why he hasn't shown any leadership in getting us out. I mean none whatsoever. He even voted against requiring Bush to get congressional approval to send more troops. How do you explain that?

I can explain it.... he says and votes for whatever he thinks will further his political career. Can we stop pretending otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Are you running for office? No? Then why can you not answer the question that was asked?
Hillary voted for using force against Iraq. Obama was outspoken against doing so.

Can we agree that Hillary's position on the issue was wrong, and Obama's was correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. I answered your question....
I don't give him ANY credit for it because he has not backed up those easy to use words with any leadership since he was in a position to do so. Can you tell me why I should give him credit for some blowhard words he said when it didn't matter, yet has not backed up those words with ANY action whatsoever since he has been in that position?

Listen to him bleat on about this during the debate, when he has shown NO LEADERSHIP ON THIS IN CONGRESS. No, he doesn't get any credit. He is completely full of baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #67
92. Sad. You cannot answer the simplest of questions.
And so buildeth the Left's version of the 25%ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #92
101. No...........
You just don't like the answer. Your man voted against the 2006 Kerry Fiengold bill to withdraw forces from Iraq by May 2007. He also voted against an admendment to require Bush to get congressional authorization to send yet more troops into Iraq. He has shown NO leadership on this issue he beats her to death with. I don't give credit for bullshit rhetoric that is not backed up by actions. That's your answer. Whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. And so it goes, 'round and 'round....
Hillary was wrong on her Iraq war vote. Her judgement was poor. It was a mistake.

In all your blather trying to cast Obama's Senate record as being pro-war, you fail, just like the candidate in question, to simply admit that entrusting George W Bush with the decision to go to war was an error in judgement. A mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. His brother was killed before he could do what he wanted to do
History is also very clear on that fact.

Obama spoke out against the war. Hillary didn't. She didn't really say anything against the war until it was politically convenient for her to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. No, sorry, that isn't the way it happened
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM by MagsDem
MLK was an avowed republican at the time, and JFK all but ignored him. MLK did not like JFK at all because he thought he had no courage on the issue. Eleanor Roosevelt was equally vocal in her criticism of JFK on that score as well. And in fact, he refused to say, during his campaign, whether he would pledge to get it passed.

And ironically, he dodged an important vote on civil rights when he was in the senate, which lead Elenanor to remark: "He could use a lot less profile, and much more courage."

Don't try to match me when it comes to history. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
54. I know history too
When King was arrested while Kennedy was running for president in 1960, King's father asked Kennedy for help getting him out of the prison where he was being held. And when Kennedy was able to get him released, King Sr promised him 10 million votes. Since most blacks were republicans at the time, this was a big deal and most likely won the election for Kennedy. King, Jr and Kennedy then became friends and worked together on civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. You are talking about 3.5 yrs prior to Kennedy's death
And he did help Kennedy get elected. And 3 yrs later, MLK was still trying to get Kennedy to move the civil right bill forward. I'm not saying they were arch enemies, just that MLK was not happy with him and didn't think he had the courage. Kennedy continually told him the time wasn't right (because he was looking forward to his own battle for relection). Where do you think the MLK quote "The time is always right to do what is right" came from? It came from his frustration with Kennedy who consistently put political expediency first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Outrageous nonsense about the greatest living legislator.
Teddy Kennedy is a giant, figuratively speaking(except his head, which is literally gigantic). He chose Obama for good reasons. How unrealistic to think he'd be so petty on something so important. Talk about your fairy tales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. Oh no, that is a perfect example of how these egos work
... it makes perfect sense if you have ever seen the inside of the political world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. It's obvious you have never been close to real politics.
Beyond the precinct level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. Try again.... I was on the board of a major non-profit in DC
I have met at least half our dem senators, more than 50 congresspeople, had dinner twice with John Edwards, and Terry McAuliffe (their people called me, not the other way around). I've had two brief conversations with Elizabeth Edwards, and one each with Howard Dean, and Hillary -- all lovely people. Closest I got to the big Dog was a handshake. Never got to meet Gore, but sure wish I would have. I won't even start on the pundits other than to say James Carville is kind of a jerk, and totally whipped by his wife.

So don't make assumptions about people you have never met, okay? I'm not saying I was a mover or shaker, and certainly not any longer, but yes, I have been very close to "real" politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #45
58. Your posts reveal a much less politically aware history.
I'm sure that resume is impressive to the people you hang out with. Me, not so much.

I'll stick with my opinion of this preposterous story and your version of it. There's always a market for internet fiction, of course, so don't let me dissuade you from further promoting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. Hey, you made a bullshit accusation...
I'm not trying to impress you -- couldn't care less. Just saying you are full of shit (because you are -- you know nothing about me). And it's not MY story. In the case of MLK and JFK it's historical fact. In the case of Teddy and his Obama endorsement, I haven't known Keith Olberman to give air time to bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #61
74. Stop, you're making me laugh.
The delusions of grandeur some here have over being on the fringe of politics.

Have fun with that. I'll add you to the list and we can stop bothering each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Keep laughing then....
I have no delusions of grandeur or anything else. I made it clear I was no mover or shaker. However, I have spent many, many years very dedicated to federal politics. You can disagree with me if you like, but it's pretty damn ignorant to say I have no connection to "real" politics beyond the precinct level when you don't know the first thing about me. And that is a fact. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #45
93. Jesus You Dare Hurl The Accusation Of Egoist When You Are A Can Of Moxie
I have never seen you on the board before tonight but your ego could wipe the planets ass. You say you are not a mover and shaker but you drop names and shit on countless posters who have much more time here then you do. What fucking hubris. I never really liked Hill but you make me loathe her just because you are such a complete fuckwittage and self promoting shit. Way to go Captain Arrogance. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #93
100. Should I just pretend someone that doesn't know me from adam....
... is correct when they claim I have never been involved in politics above the "precinct" level? If so, why?

As for how long I have been here, I have been here since 2002. I dropped out of posting for several years because of the amazing "fuckwittage" of DU posters that decided to scapegoat the GLBT community for Kerry's absofuckinglutely wussified campaign. Why? Because the fuckwittage of DU couldn't face the fact that they nominated a piss poor, complete wussy of a candidate. It was all the fault of teh gays!!!! Seriesly1111!!!

If you were here, you couldn't have missed that one. So don't talk to me about how long I have been here, or complete fuckwits on DU. Got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #93
102. WOW! You can get Moxie in a can now?
If Moxie lasts more than 6 hours, please call a physician. Not responsible for excess friction or tombstones.

:)

Actually, I am just intimidated from trying to "match" people in history.
Some of us like to have conversations more than contests.
Anti-competitive disorder?
I guess I am a real wimp, but it is hard to imagine engaging in a conversation and saying "You can't match me!" "Oh yeah, well you have OBVIOUUSLY never been blah blah" and so on.
I would be so outa there, like a saloon brawl....or GDP.
Takes all kinds, though - I hope you guys apply that fightin' spirit and take it to the freep boards. You will TOTALLY kick their asses...
Others will gently persuade voters in the general, listening, addressing their concerns without insults, and working their particular skills.
Samurai and ninjas, in common purpose, each doing our part.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Open a history book and stop embarrassing yourself and this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. On what particular point do you dispute me?
Please, be specific. Every bio of JFK, every bio of Johnson (including the transcripts of his tapes - he had them before Nixon you know), and even most bio of Elenanor Roosevelt recount it exactly that way. What point do you dispute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. Ted Kennedy is
just an old politician from the "old" democratic party. Funny that the Obama camp is salivating over Ted Kennedy's endorsement. Strange. Thought Obama was for "change"/"new direction". Seems to me, the Obama's new direction is pulled back further than the Clinton's. Way back. Go Figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
34. Black people demanded their civil rights
Politicians complied. I don't give credit to anyone but the people of the civil rights movement and their leaders for the courage and restraint and discipline and untiring effort it took to force the leaders' hands.

What a bunch of bullshit--arguing over this. If this is true they should be ashamed, both of them.

Clinton sounded good tonight, but I will not forgive her for glorifying state power over people power and politicizing this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
36. Sour grapes are so so ugly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. Well I hope you don't mean me.....
Teddy's endorsement doesn't bother me. I think it will hurt him more than it helps. I know Clinton wasn't asking for it. It would have been better for the dems as a whole if he'd of shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
41. Source? Link? Buelher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. Keith Olberman - as previously stated x 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
77. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
53. I'm sorry it may in part way be the reason but you can't make a speech that good for someone you ..
...don't beleive in. The speech was the real deal and we saw in the senate at the SOTU that they have a good friendship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
64. LOL -- I'm sure they like each other just fine
But yes, a politician, especially Ted Kennedy, can certainly make a speech "that good" no matter what he believes. That's why they are politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
59. Where is the link to this info? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
62. So you sat in on the phonecall, did you?
Wow, you must be psychic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. I trust Keith Olberman...
I think he is the most credible journalist on television, actually. Have you known him to lie? I haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Did Olbermann say where he got that from? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. It's based on some "anonymous sources"
Probably the same "anonymous sources" that said Kennedy was not going to endorse anyone. Marc Ambinder ran that story, then had to admit it was actually just a Clinton insider who gave him the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #71
81. Oh, SUPER LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Oh I believe it....
I used to be on the board of directors of a major non-profit in DC, and once had a senator that wouldn't speak to us for a year and had a major temper tantrum because he wasn't allowed more than 10 minutes on stage at a huge fundraiser. This stuff happens all the time with politicians. What's sad is that they do it through their staff members as well. I mean really petty shit, like disinviting others to strategy sessions, refusing to release pac money to them. This is totally par for the course in DC. They really are a huge bunch of babies. Believe it or not, it's almost always the men. The females tend not to pull that kind of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #82
91. I think you believe what benefits your candidate and thats about it.
And also, I know what DC is like. I practically grew up there, my dad was a lobbyist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #91
103. "My" candidate?
Edwards was my candidate. I think Hillary will do a good job based on her experience, and I think Barack Obama is a pantload of baloney, doesn't have experience, is naive, panders to the right and wing nut job Christians, bullshits constantly, and is basically an empty suit. "My" candidate isn't in the race any longer. And I sure ain't voting for Obama. She is what is left, and we could do much worse. Obama for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #68
79. So you have no first hand source on this. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. And you'll never get a quoted source on these type of stories
You, my friend, don't understand how politics works in DC. It happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #83
89. Thanks for admitting you have no reliable sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
70. Why even bother
trying to post something like this???? Obama supporters don't care. They think Obama can't do no wrong. I'm still waiting for Obama to apologize about McClurkin and Caldwell. Also I want answers to Resco. But Obama just side steps this issue too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. I just thought it was funny
It didn't make much sense at the time. I knew some fight must have happened behind the scenes for Teddy to get out of his neutral corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. I know what you mean...
I ask my dad, who knows Kerry and my dad thinks and will stand by this, that Kerry's backing of Obama over Edwards was a result of the mess about Ohio in 2004. Edwards wanted those votes counted and Kerry ran with his tail between his legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #75
78. Actually, I know that to be true as well
From the Edwards side of the story. And I don't mean second hand. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #78
86. I'm glad my dad was telling me the truth.
I know that Hillary is not perfect and I don't want her to be. But when it comes to trying to say anything about Obama and facts all hell breaks with his supporters. They are starting to scare me. They remind me of Bush-bots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
80. he said he was against the war. not that he didn't vote for it.
cheater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #80
84. What's he done to back up those words?
Not a single thing. That you cannot deny. Stop acting like he is holier than thou. He's a typical politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
85. Um.... this is not exactly news.
Anyone knew this the day the endorsement was made. That's the kind of back room politics that is behind most all endorsements. Big deal. It's not news, and doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
88. This story is probably true. Hillary's remarks which the MSM
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 02:28 AM by McCamy Taylor
deliberately distorted as a slur against MLK Jr by misquoting them were actually a comparison of JFK with LBJ(with Obama as JFK and her as LBJ so no racial slur intended), with LBJ getting the praise for passing civil rights laws. I posted this last weekend before Ted Kennedy endorsed Obama, when I was writing about how the press was making up racist stuff that Hillary said. The NYT misquoted her three times leaving out the JFK reference, which seemed odd, since they support her (so why would they try to make her out to be a racist?) and everyone else was misquoting her too and posting her on YouTube and having a fit about the racial slur. But when Teddy endorsed Obama I knew that the NYT was trying to cover her ass by deleting the JFK reference, hoping to smooth things over with the Kennedys, who treat JFK like some kind of holy of holies. That is really messed up of the NYT, valuing the feelings of the Kennedys more than African-Americans. Shows some pretty mixed up priorities. And shows what inflated egos the Kennedys have.

That said, Teddy did a good thing, because he stopped all the race talk in the corporate media cold. With a Kennedy endorsement, Obama stopped being a scary Black man and went back to being half White/ half Black and very safe. And the Democratic Party was united again. So it is all good, even if it does make the Kennedys out to be sort of petty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NursesluvHillary Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
96. I always thought RFK tried to do more for Civil Rights during the Kennedy era
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #96
98. RFK was JFK's right hand man.
One might conclude that RFK was doing the political "dirty work" so that JFK might avoid the political backlash from Southern whites.

Considering that the "solid South" had been the foundation of the Democratic party since Roosevelt, it was not an insignificant consideration. Nixon exploited the dissatisfaction of Southern whites in '68, and the Republicans count the South as their own power base now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
99. excellent last paragraph. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
104. **sigh**
:nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC