|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:50 AM Original message |
"It May Take A Clinton To Clean Up After A Bush BUT IT TAKES AN OBAMA TO BREAK THE CYCLE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because Bill did such a crappy job for the economy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. bank deregulation grew under Clinton, he kept on Greenspan & the Tech Bubble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Because he did a GREAT job 'cleaning' up FOR Poppy Bush on all the criminal matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. it takes an Obama to stop a Village of Bush Clinton Bush Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. Eight more years! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. This is too true. can you all just see Jeb Bush after Hillary waiting in the wings in 2016...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxer (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. And Chelsey after that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. I am tired of voting for a dynasty, give it break huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grrr050 (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Cycle of what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. war machine, war machine, war machine. Rich-- Poor, Rich----Poor, Rich-----Poorer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUyellow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
9. I can see Jeb running in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Chelsea 2020. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Jenna 2028. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxer (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. What about Laura, we better shorten the election cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. George P. is waiting in the wings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
styersc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
11. Unfortunately Obama in the general election would mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
13. That's the Neo-Con, Neo-Lib Reacharound... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
16. How sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
20. nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
21. Who in the devil cares about breaking a cycle??????????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. The American People care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
23. Sorry, but the cycle will end at the end of Hillary's terms in office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Re-electing all the establishment reps got us here they are more in touch with the corruption system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. and a Jeb and a Chelsea. no, no, no this isn't good for democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. I'm not against a woman president but we need a less polarising one Skinner would be superb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disndat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
24. The more extended the dynasties, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
25. Oooh, succinct and devastating...I'm succinctly devastated - NOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
26. Aye! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
27. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
28. Exactly ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yep, I find the Clintons too cosy with the bush family, if we have an option we should take it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
33. "It took a Clinton to give us a second Bush" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC