bernicewilliams
(101 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 12:38 PM
Original message |
Stop analyzing who Edwards' support went to in every poll |
|
It is stupid to speculate who Edwards support went to, based on a poll result.
Do you assume that even if Edwards' supporters split 50%-50% in a poll, and one candidate happens to increase his lead, then it means that Edwards' supporters leaned towards the candidate whose lead increased?
Until a pollster asks the specific questions to those who were previously supporting John Edwards, you will know nothing.
In the meantime, keep guessing at your own risk.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Most of us Edwards supporters are still guessing |
|
We don't know who we are going to support at this point.
This is one Edwards supporter who's support hangs in the wind for now. I may still vote Edwards in Ohio Primary in March because I don't know which one I support.
|
Clarkansas
(701 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. How about I analyze whatever I want |
|
and you don't? Is there something wrong with that?
By the way, it looks to me like most of Edwards' supporters are going to Obama. :)
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
3. why don't you just block the threads that offend your |
|
delicate sensibilities? I'll do what I please. You have no right to tell others they can't speculate, and your oblique threat that it's risky to speculate about where the Edwards support is going is a crock of shit. Shove it. I don't care where votes on DU go. It's irrelevant. And all the pollsters ARE looking at where Edwards support is going. Live with it. He dropped out.
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-01-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How about you stop telling grown folks what and what not |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |