Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s campaign slogan in the GE, “I was against the war before I actually had to vote for it”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:07 PM
Original message
Obama’s campaign slogan in the GE, “I was against the war before I actually had to vote for it”
Cmon, it doesn’t sound very convincing to me. I don’t think he has any real advantage over Hillary when facing off McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. as opposed to..
"I was for the war; but I didn't realize I was for the war until I needed to show that I was not for the war yet needed to not explain that I WAS for the war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. as opposed to..
"I was for the war; but I didn't realize I was for the war until I needed to show that I was not for the war yet needed to not explain that I WAS for the war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. that's absurd. Even the most anti-war Senators have voted to
fund the war because of the troops. People like Leahy, Kennedy, Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Voted to fund with time-tables for withdrawel even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Others did it, so that makes it OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Weak .... but I'm glad you are trying. Good candidate spirit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. McCain can't make make that argument.
Imagine

McCain: If you were against the war, why did you vote to fund it?
Obama: Because you sent our troops there without armor, and I voted to protect them.

Where does he go from there?

They can't use a "for it before you were against it" attack on Obama, because he wasn't for it in the first place. And America isn't as split as it was in 2004, when a good amount of voters were still unsure if the war was right or wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah McCain probably doesn't want to go there.
Ya know he will though. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Right ON...Great post..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama had the balls to speak out against the war at a time when it was unpopular to do so
Unlike Clinton, who apparently couldn't be bothered to do any research to determine what she was voting for in the IWR. She was clearly more concerned with getting votes than doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wrong. He was against it and spoke out against it even predicting exactly what would happen...
Good judgement unlike Hillary's. He's in a strong position against ANY Repub. Voting to protect the troops who Hillary sent in there is not a flip-flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I remember quite well
how I felt after the vote on the joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq. I was furious.

For those that have forgotten the results...

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---77
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bond (R-MO)
Breaux (D-LA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Campbell (R-CO)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
Daschle (D-SD)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Gramm (R-TX)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Hutchinson (R-AR)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Miller (D-GA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Nickles (R-OK)
Reid (D-NV)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-NH)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thompson (R-TN)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

NAYs ---23
Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chafee (R-RI)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Graham (D-FL)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wyden (D-OR)


I also remember quite well that I and many others called the result of that vote quite correctly. As such, I find it difficult not to question the judgment of those that failed to vote NAY to HJRes 114 on 10/11/2002. This, of course, doesn't mean that I wouldn't support Hillary against any Republican - I would support her, and do so gladly. But, as this primary unfolds - I can not support her against the likes of Obama. Simply put - in the most important vote of her Senate career - Hillary Clinton not only failed to vote correctly, she put her support behind a resolution that has been catastrophic for this country. That's hard to get over, and frankly, the correct vote on HJRes 114 was obvious to any that took an honest look. Her explanation of that vote hasn't even come close to satisfying me - and I doubt that it possibly could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wrong he can say he would never abandon troops in harms way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. He can say he wasn't there. Not present. Absent.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 08:26 PM by Yossariant
He can't be held responsible for votes he didn't cast, while he's busy taking credit for votes he didn't cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. rove is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hi, George, how's it going with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Clearly you don't understand you are either perpetuating a republican political tactic
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 09:51 AM by izzybeans
or have been sucked in by it. Cherry picking votes and mischaracterizing them is their only leg to stand on.

A reply of he voted present to dodge a hard battle will ring false. He stood with Planned Parenthood as this was their chosen tactic. And voting present some 1/100th of a percent of the time is hardly a worthy talking point. Don't you think?

Or do you want to continue with the Rovian lie about his voting record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. It sounds shallow.
And it's not what Obama has said, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Barack "Johnny-one-note" Obama. He has nothing else to offer. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Neither, apparently, do you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I too, opposed the war and my ideas for a national health plan is flawed.
Maybe some of you geniuses will support me should I choose to run. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Your ideas "is" flawed? Apparently your English *is* flawed, too.
Not to mention your estimation of Obama's health plan, especially when compared to Hillary's.

Is your children learning?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. Hillary's slogan: "Bush told me to vote for the war!"
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
23. Look he has NO advantage. Smoke and mirrors. Distortions and lies
Since being in the senate his record IS EXACTLY THE SAME. Except when it comes to hard votes then he is conveniently absent...so he can later claim any stance rather than make the hard decisions....but ignore all that cause...dang, he sure talks good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. You think wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC