Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton looking ahead to March 4 Texas and Ohio primaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:32 PM
Original message
Clinton looking ahead to March 4 Texas and Ohio primaries
-snip-

By Anne E. Kornblut
All eyes are on Feb. 5, but the Clinton campaign is looking ahead even further: to March 4, when both Ohio and Texas will hold their nominating contests.

Clinton hopes to win the majority of votes in four states next Tuesday: California, New York, New Jersey and Arkansas. But her advisers are already quietly conceding that the delegate count will be close at the end of the day, thanks to Democratic rules that award most delegates proportionally by congressional district.

That means that the race will almost surely drag on. Obama strategists have their focus on Feb. 9 (when Louisiana votes for 69 delegates) and Feb. 12 (when D.C., Virginia and Maryland vote for a total of 238 delegates). Clinton will naturally campaign in the states with races throughout the month (Washington State, Wisconsin and Maine are among the races after Feb. 5). But her real target is March 4, when Ohio (with 161 delegates) and Texas (and 221 delegates) vote, advisers said in interviews this week.

A bit of expectations managing? Perhaps. Any chance she will campaign in the Virgin Islands, whose nine delegates are awarded Feb. 9? Unlikely. For now, Clinton is in California, with a San Francisco fundraiser on Friday night, moving on to New Mexico, Arizona and Missouri over the weekend. She campaigns in Massachusetts and Connecticut on Monday.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/01/clinton_advisers_see_a_race_th.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary Clinton has Ohio.
Ohio-Clinton.............it is what it is..............


She is the ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You've got that right...
:hi: Are you getting a lot of Obama/Caroline ads running there? I'm going to wear out the mute button up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honestly, I don't know how they do it.
They travel all over, non-stop. 30 engagements on some days. Campaigns like this must wear a body out.

I am amazed how they can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone who thinks politicians are lazy
hasn't paid attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. ...
I think Ohio goes to Obama. Its close to Illinois and if he has alot of time he can do very well there. The more Obama stays in a state the more people move to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well if Edwards is on the ballot in Texas, that is who I am voting for.
Sorry Hillary. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think she'll be neck-and-neck with Barack through February
and begin to pull away with the March 4th Primary. If he doesn't do well in Mississippi on the 11th of March, then he'll have to do EXTRAORDINARILY well on April 22nd in Pennsylvania which is when I strongly suspect she'll lock up the requisite number of delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. FYI Texas has 220 delegates total.
IVR poll
http://ivrpolls.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=1

January 11, 2008

Among Texas Democrats, Barack Obama had his best showing yet, but Hillary Clinton still has a solid lead. Clinton maintains her strength among Whites over 60 and among Latino women, while Obama maintains his strength among African-Americans, but there is significant movement among Latino men. While Clinton has had a very strong lead among all Latinos, Obama is now almost tied among Latino men. There was no other demographic segment that showed significant movement. Bill Richardson had received most of his Latino support from men, so his supporters may have moved to Obama when he dropped out of the race. That is not enough to account for all of Obama's gain, but it may help explain that one noticable shift.

John Edwards did particularly well among middle aged white men, but received almost no support from African-Americans and did much worse among women than men in most age and ethnic groupings. Dennis Kucinich held steady at 1%, Mike Gravel surged to 1% and 10% were undecided.

564 polled 1/10/08, Margin of Error 4.1%

Clinton 46% (51%)
Obama 28% (17%)
Edwards 14% (15%)
Kucinich 1% (1%)
Gravel 1% (0%)
Undecided 10%
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Huckabee 26% (29%)
McCain 24% (7%)
Thompson 12% (14%)
Romney 11% (14%)
Giuliani 10% (16%)
Paul 4% (6%)
Hunter 3% (2%)
Keyes 0% (0%)
Undecided 8%
725 polled 1/10/08, Margin of Error 3.6%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There's a new TX poll out today
and he's now within ten points. He's made rapid gains there and he has a month to campaign. He could well take TX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He may
Either way no one is going to have a big delegate win in Texas, and presumably also Ohio. I see this going long into March and even April. It may come down to money. Can Hillary match raising $32 million a month?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. When I Googled this is what I got. Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. here you go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks.
Here is the source link. Why it did not show for me is a mystery.
http://www.ivrpolls.com/
Clinton 48% (46%)
Obama 38% (28%)
Gravel 3% (0%)
Undecided 10% (8%)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Poll Opinion Consultants: Ohio voters behind Clinton, McCain
http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2008/01/28/daily37.html
In the ongoing presidential primary races,
44 percent of surveyed Ohio Democrats preferred Clinton,
trailed by Sen. Barack Obama with 28 percent
support and former Sen. John Edwards, who has since dropped out of the race, with 17 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC