Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the Republicans are doomed no matter who wins on the Dem side.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:43 PM
Original message
I think the Republicans are doomed no matter who wins on the Dem side.
The ultra-right wing religious conservatives are coming apart at the seem. Pat Robertson endorsed an early loser. They can't stand McCain and regard Romney as a part of a cult. Huckabee has made some bonehead statements that make one wonder what planet he is living on. Big time Televangelists will soon be feeling their own recession as more and more of the "saved" get tired of pedophiles, lying and hypocritical homophobes fleecing their brains and their pockets not to mention the Grasssley IRS stick. In short, they have become a failed political party. NOW IS THE TIME FOR THAT VIABLE THIRD PARTY TO COME TO LIFE. Not Independent but truly Progressive. Think of another name if you will but IT IS TIME!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. What? You're not going to indulge in the new DU sport of "McCain panic?"
Good for you! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Am Not Counting McCain Out at All, Personally
He could be next president for better or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think, though, developing a clear-headed strategy viz. McCain, as opposed to all the panic
throwing-up-of-hands/chicken little threads, might be more productive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. It Seems to be Either
panic or complacency. Of the two, I would prefer panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. no, it doesn't seem to be one or the other...
and by panicking, you can make a lot of backfiring decisions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Well, You Pointed Out the Panic Reaction Yourself
and there is certainly a lot of sentiment here that the Democratic nominee will be the likely winner in November. So that was the basis for "either-or."

I am not at all sure of a Democratic victory. Obama and Clinton both have weaknesses as candidates and are both subject to swiftboating. I would rather the base and the insiders all wake up to the fact that all bets are off and this is going to be a dogfight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm not saying be complacent. I just don't like all this "let's give the fuck up if McCain
...is the nominee" posts, usually with the addenda "which is what I'm planning to do if my candidate doesn't head the ticket..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. If it were a rational (or fair) process we'd be talking about the Al Gore library
First of all the elec college favors the GOP and secondly the media favors the GOP especially McCain and despises Bill and Hillary Clinton. Pointing out that McCain's willing to stay in Iraq for a million years isn't going to do the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I think there are ways to separate him from his "base..."
But the idea that McCain is unassailable is ridiculous...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark_bruns74 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. i agree
people who dont read much of the details tend to love him. the media keeps promoting him as the middle-man, so reflexively independent people find that appealing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. We have John Edwards to thank
for letting his supporters turn on the candidates
who beat his ass into the ground.
And he needs to cut it out and cut out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. From your keyboard to god's ears....
...if I believed in a supreme presence...

It's always time to vote for the best candidate rather than voting for "the Dem"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Without doubt, they're like a zombie that don't know it's dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. They won't have any defense against "history"
Think about it ... no matter who gets the Dem nomination, history will be made and the media will mention that constantly. They're already doing it. When an American is faced with the choice between simply voting for a candidate or being a part of history, I think they'll choose history. No one likes to feel like they "missed the boat" and got left behind. JMHO :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. TRUE DAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree. The GOP is too fractured. :>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. GOP Grand Old perverts, bend over. Put you head between your
legs and kiss your ass goodbye. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. So you are advoting at people leave the democratic party and form a 3rd party?
Here? On a Democratic website?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Never underestimate the repugs. Or do so at your peril.
Rally 'round the flag and all that jazz. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. I really respect your opinion
I agree that McCain has little to offer. He is selling a war product to a war-weary war consumer. It's not going to sell. And McCain doesn't have any clear-cut solutions to the economy other than tax cuts. War and tax cuts have been Bush's only solutions to our problems as well, and people know that and are tired of that.

But a third party I think would give the Republicans the only chance they have. If it siphons off enough Democratic vote, then we can have the reverse of what occurred in 1992, when Perot took a lot of votes away from GHW Bush.

I would love to live in a multi-party system. I think a parliamentary system would be much better than what we have today. Ross Perot won 20 million votes in 1992 and yet NOT ONE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE. Foreigners who see how our crazy system works must shake their heads. As long as we have a system that favors the two party tyranny in America, third parties will have a very hard time. Get rid of the Electoral College first. Then have a direct vote for the President where winning separate states doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC