Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shame on you DUers who are trying to pretend the IWR she voted on is now irrelevant!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:33 PM
Original message
Shame on you DUers who are trying to pretend the IWR she voted on is now irrelevant!
Just like Hillary, you must come from the Dick Cheney school of politics!

You should be ashamed of yourself. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who's pretending. It is irrelevant now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Thank you.
The past is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah, the past is over....
especially for all the war dead. But, for their families, the past haunts their futures.

The War vote is very relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nothing I can do to change the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yeah, but there is something about the past that you can use to change the future.
Learn from it. Don't elect people who, in the past, used poor judgment to help get us into the Iraq War, and then refuse to own up to making that poor judgment.

You can't change the past, but you can allow the lesson of the past to change you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. That argument doesn't work as a defense at your murder trial
and it shouldn't work here either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. or shame on obamanistas who think his continued voting to support the war is virtuous? Or
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 09:36 PM by msongs
shame on both :-)

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are sick --- Who are you people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjones2818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bingo!
Not a dime for war supporters!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. how do you feel about the Pelosi-istas who think this
continued voting to support the war is virtuous? same?
It's her job to lead, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bullshit! She voted to back UN sanctions and support the troops
Bush was going to attack come hell or high water, lie to everyone and nothing Democrats could do could have stopped him. Interesting though that :+bama has the same exact record on Iraq since he joined the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You sound like a mad idiot, stop it!
Fool, shame on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The IWR was what it was.
A de facto declaration of war.

I don't defend it, it was a blunder.

Obama was never faced with the same choice.

Who knows how he would have actually voted given the chance, because as you note, they have the same record since 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And put her vote on an AUTHORIZATION TO USE MILITARY FORCE.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 10:05 PM by rateyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. military force...
is just a code word for UN sanctions :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. then why didn't she vote for resolution
that backed UN sanctions and supported the troops? She actually voted for a resolution that gave the president a blank check to go to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. The only one using the word "irrelevant" is you. I don't recall any Hillary people saying irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. they both suck for what they did about this war but they are all we
got. The votes aren't irrelevant or over. People are still dead. If they could sit up from their graves, then it would all be irrelevant. We are all responsible for our actions, good and bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Shame on Barack Obama
And his fanclub for trying to pretend that gay baiting and pandering to bigots is now irrelevant!

Shame whoever you want. Your candidate should be ashamed of his tactics and his personal choice of surrogates in the form of McClurkin the Bush lover.
I would not even bring it up if the Obama campaign and his backers would not act like such holier than thou self proclaimers. Your candidate voted for the Patriot Act and every single request for cash that Bush could come up with. Opposed it, but paid for it. Interesting, I guess that's the 'bringing all sides together' we hear about, it really means 'say one thing, do the other'.
How many here will agree to pay for something they think is immoral, wasteful and stupid? So what's with all those funding votes? Obama voted for Dick Cheney's Energy Bill, since you mentioned Cheney!
Obama plays dirty politics. Stop pretending he is righteous. And while you are at it, stop pretending the candidate's boosters are playing clean and honest. Far from it.
This up in the air late voting Edwards/Kucinich backer finds the defense of gay baiting coupled with the high horse attitude of the Obama camp to be hypocritical. The invective disturbing. 'Shame'? Cheney? What a steaming pile of schoolyard name calling. Odd that those who like a man like Obama would behave like those who like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh the Hillarbots SO want this to go away....but it won't. EVER.
And it shouldn't. Who the hell wants a president with their hand on the button of military force, who was so easily led to support Bush's bullshit war?

NOT ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. No we don't! Obama is a laughing stock because he doesn't get it!
Nobody cares who started it..They blame Bush, as well they should!

ALL anyone cares about is when are the troops coming home!

Keep it coming! :rofl: All people see is an empty suit out of touch with reality!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Shame on you for calling Hillary from the Cheney school of politics
That is exactly the type of crap that divides us here and keeps us fighting. If you choose fighting words you are looking for a fight. That is not what we need right now. I'll discuss the issues with someone else on a thread that doesn't start out as flamebait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. It is NOT irrelevant. Neither is Obama's initial opposition. But having doubted Edwards's
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 08:39 AM by robbedvoter
conversion, I'll say this much on his behalf: at least he changed in the right direction!
If Obama was so smart in 2002, why did he say in 2006 that we didn't have to look into how we got in Iraq? (senate speech I remember). And why did he vote to fund the war he knew was stupid? It seems the more people realized the war was wrong, the more Obama seemed to forget his initial - good -judgment.
How is this evolution of his actions make me trust his judgment as POTUS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
22. shame on you for this flamebait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC