sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 09:31 AM
Original message |
Which is more preferable and good for our nation |
|
A. A candidate that hardens the party divisions that currently exist in our country?
B. A candidate that appeals to Independents and moderate Republicans therefore establishing a wider base to govern from?
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Cut the neocons' support off at the knees. |
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Hidden in option B. is the appeal of the word bipartisan. |
|
Unfortunately today, bipartisan means doing what the republicans and corporations want. It means Democratic initiatives must be skewed to provide welfare for the uber rich or forgotten all together. You can not deal with the devil.
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
3. This is not a choice. Obama dividing the country just as |
|
much as anyone.
The DLC Centrists rule even if you have a public hanging of the Clintons.
Note how many Senate and House Members who vote with the GOP also endorse Obama. The Democratic Party will be more conservative and more like the Republican Party. Yes this is Bipartisan. Liberals are being thrown under the bus.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |