dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:49 PM
Original message |
"During the last few years of the Clinton presidency, we Democrats spent more time and energy |
Dogmudgeon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And we should believe a first-day blogger ... why? |
|
He's not even "right on day one"!
--p!
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I quoted this because it hit me between the eyes. That is all. |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
The clear conspiracy that attacked Clinton culminated in the original Bush coup of 2000. We've been enduring the fallout ever since.
Yet the Obama campaign gleefully ties the Clinton administration to the two Bush administrations with its vicious dynasty meme repeated here at least twenty times a day. Last night I saw Clintush repeated over and over, as if they were one and the same administration.
But, by all means, we should vote for Obama because we don't want the Republicans to be mean to us.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I don't want to go back there. I dread it. |
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
Tom Strong
(334 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Truth is: Things were so GOOD under Clinton... |
|
...that the nation could afford to waste it's time on some dumb-ass sex-scandal.
Bring back the good ol' days!
GO HILL!
|
THUNDER HANDS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
don't make it out to seem like they were some nostalgic time like conservatives do with the 50s. They just look better because the 2000s have been so shitty under Bush.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. I didn't do so good. Doing better now. |
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
5. As Progressives, we were sidetracked from fighting for social/economic/environmental justice. |
|
So much energy wasted on defending his lousy behavior.
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
so it don't count for me. The lousy behavior was widespread and overwelmingly republican. Private sex acts don't concern me. being traded off for votes in the south does.
|
Azathoth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Politically, the Clinton years were a nightmare |
|
The electorate overlooked it because the economy was booming. Democrats tried to look past it, even as their party was slipping into permanent minority status. Just imagine what the Clinton years would have been like had we been in a recession while hemorrhaging billions on an endless, useless, unpopular war...cause that's exactly what it's going to be like if/when Bill (oops, I mean 'Hillary') takes over again.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. OK, that is a freaking scary thought. |
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
12. that was MY vote (for Bill Clinton) I was defending |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message |