Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Picks Up LGBT Supporters From Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Original message
Obama Picks Up LGBT Supporters From Edwards
http://www.advocate.com/print_article_ektid52017.asp

A critical mass of John Edwards’s LGBT steering committee is going public with support for Sen. Barack Obama over Sen. Hillary Clinton. Twenty-two members of the Edwards campaign’s original 59-person gay and lesbian committee will now be working for Obama victories next Tuesday and throughout the rest of the primary season.

The new Obama converts include Eric Stern, who headed up Edwards’s LGBT steering committee, and longtime gay activist David Mixner, who famously campaigned for Bill Clinton in 1992, holding some of the first gay fund-raisers for a U.S. presidential candidate.

Mixner, a peace activist during the war in Vietnam, came out early for Edwards after the former North Carolina senator made an unequivocal case for ending the Iraq war at the historic Riverside Church in New York City.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. i wonder if they'll have offices across from mcclurkin?
Would make for interesting water cooler conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. it's like a peculiar form of Turette's Syndrome amongst Hillary supporters who don't care about gays
enough to protest their own candidates pandering to homophobes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. You're so full of shit you probaby have to TP your face when you burp. You don't care in the least
about gays - you just want our votes for your own purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. I was married to a gay man for 8 years and live with he and his partner. I just care about honesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. That speaks to your poor judgment about assessing important decisions. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. That was fucking cold.
Two of my best friends have gay dads. Their coming out was painful for the whole family. How dare you belittle this woman just because she loved someone who didn't completely know himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. It doesn't belittle her to acknowledge that she's shown poor judgment - between
this, creationism and an array of other unfortunate positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I don't know anything about her view on creationism
but saying that marrying the person she (presumably) loved was poor judgment is pretty distasteful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. I can't treat everyone with kid gloves.
You're a nice person, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. I'm really not
But I only stomp people for a good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. It's not my intent to engage in a prolonged tit-for-tat on this.
I'd just say I think I have good enough reason.

I respect that you disagree.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. I am emphatically NOT a Creationist. I don't believe in god. I AM an Idealist, a perfectly solid
philosophical stance from which to view the world and engage in scientific inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. What important decision are you referencing? My marriage? It was more like an adoption by two men
who are more my family than my biological family.

They gave me a safe environment to develop my personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Democratic branch of the Log Cabin Republicans...
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 05:58 PM by KennedyGuy
there's always a few...
wonder if they came for the "cure"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. More importantly, anybody care why some would want to take the "cure"?
Or is that a taboo question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. My Ultimate Issue..
the bombings on Iraq. Thank you, David Mixner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe they are unhappy homosexuals
that wish to be cured?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. maddiejoan sometimes i want to reach through my computer and.....
give you a huge hug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Hug accepted!
and given back!

{{{{hugz}}}}}}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. does that make me an unhappy homosexual because I'm supporting obama
just curious


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I dunno

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think clinton is a far better bet for the lgbt community that obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. especially since she flip-flopped on DOMA?
up until a few months ago, she was still supporting parts of DOMA which was signed into law BY HER HUSBAND

I love how everyone has forgotten about her support for DOMA

I think that's a bit more important than Obama having Donnie boy appear while everyone has forgotten that Obama also had a gay minister appear at the same event


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. But Hillary is not Bill. Shame, shame, go pray for rain.
Unfortunately, all the jokes that her election would make it Bill's 3rd term... or Hillary's 3rd term are somewhat entertaining...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. go back and look at her comments on DOMA
and let's not forget the whole co-presidency thing when Bill was in office

I'm curious to know where she stood when HER HUSBAND signed the bill into law

and it's raining now so I don't have to pray for rain

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Even though Bill Clinton signed DOMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. yes i think bill clinton signed doma to prevent a constitiional amendment defining marriage
as between one man and one woman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Delete.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 06:26 PM by JackBeck
GOt some dates mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. And to disallow partnership rights to gay couples.
Which is why John Kerry and several others voted against it, and Clinton shouldn't have signed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
53. Don't need to "think" he did - that is exactly why he did.
Most don't care to know the actual history/reason behind DOMA. It was much discussed with the movement leaders at the time.

Last I heard Obama didn't have anything on his website indicating that he had an advisory board. Maybe he has added something now that S.C. is past.

Bill Clinton took a lot of heat about the number of staff members and appointments he made from our community. He ignored it. Hillary also had many staff members that are/were gay. She ignored it. I was personally astonished at their open support. They didn't have to do it - they just did it. That is who they are.

Seems like some GLBT folk are ignoring reality now. When Obama talks about the GLBT community he is reading from a script. When Hillary talks about our community she is speaking from her heart. Her heart has been with us from her undergraduate days. She is, and always has been, surrounded by gay and lesbian friends and staffers.

I was talking with a friend a few weeks ago. We go way back (almost 35 years) working in the movement together. We both understand that Obama "has a problem" with us. We can see it because it was necessary to be ever alert to this attitude. My friend and I were celebrating that for the followup generations there is so much less need to be aware of that attitude. At the same time you are much less practiced at spotting it.

So many just wanted an apology from Obama about McClurkin - you gave Obama the benefit of the doubt. You thought he had made a mistake and once he understood he had hurt us he would undo it. It has not happened. It was not a mistake. It is who he is - he is homophobic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Absolutely no question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even though Edwards voted for the war and made some early remarks
about those who opposed the war? This is the most confusing election in my memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's sad how anyone who endorses Obama is automatically trashed
by a hoard of Clintonites.

They seem to reflect the ruthlessness of their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. It's sad
That you dismiss legitimate concerns of some of the LGBT community as mere partisanship.

Did it occur to you there is a REASON I support Hillary over Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. But how could anyone have legitimate concerns with The Son of God?
Don't you see? He's going to make us believe, which leads to hope, which leads to change, which leads to lots of ponies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. do you have any idea how offensive your post is?
son of God?

nice


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. Do you have any idea how tiresome personality cults are? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. you should talk to some of the Clinton supporters about that
Hillary and Bill can do no wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. maddie, didn't you get THAT memo, either?
Queers who support Obama are mainstream Democrats whose opinions are valued and must be respected -- after all, LGBTs comprise a significant and important voting bloc.

Queers who do not support Obama are fringe radicals -- and probably not even real queers anyway, but Hillbots in disguise, what with all that transparent faux outrage -- but none of this matters, since, after all, LGBTs comprise such a small, powerless minority, the Democrats really don't need them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Oh
Being a transgendered dyke --I rarely get memos (or even support from most of the mainstream LGBT community)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. I wish I *didn't* get those memos...
...but the message always comes through, loud and clear.

I hear you re support from the mainstream LGBT community (whatever that is) -- which is another subject for another day, but suffice to say, you have mine (whatever that's worth), unconditionally. I love me my transgendered sisters & brothers. (And Barney Frank can take a flying leap for selling out on ENDA. If "equality" is throwing TGs under the bus so I won't lose a job, fuck it -- I don't want it. That's privilege, not equality.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. obama had my support equally till mcclurkin happened. so the reason i 'trash' him
is because he supports someone who believes that i need a cure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. Me too. The reason I'm against 0bama is his actions. He had me until then.
I've been told I only mention McClurkin because I'm against 0bama. But the reverse is true: I'm against 0bama because of McClurkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. It's sad how anybody who doesn't endorse Obama is automatically trashed.
Belittled, called names, shat upon, marginalized and made to feel like they're worthless scum.

Then the Obama supporters turn around and act as if they're the persecuted ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. good to hear from mainstream gay activists
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. "Mainstream Gay Activists"?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. these people aren't mainstream?
Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Since when do gay activists get labeled mainstream at all? Or activists at all, for that matter?
These distinctions are a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Interesting how people who support Obama are "mainstream"
And anybody who doesn't is "fringe". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I'm sure the Log Cabin Republicans also think they are mainstream and realistic.
I wish people would learn to disagree without trying to demean or insult those they disagree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. I'm sure they do
I'm afraid I can't begin to fathom sucking up to people who want to destroy me.


I wish people would learn to disagree without trying to demean or insult those they disagree with.

Ironically the ones who are worst at that spend all their time claiming they're so abused by the other side. One who makes 200+ posts a day, most of which are used to call people nasty names and attack people who don't support his candidate, claims that others are nasty and post on DU too much. Pot, meet kettle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. "mainstream gay activists" = Obamatologists n/t
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 06:11 PM by QC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. no, they are activists who retain perspective on reality
rather than getting worked up over one stupid incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. You have confused your personal bias with perspective on reality.
Oopsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. ditto to you
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Except I haven't said people who disagree with me don't have perspective on reality. That was your
insult for people who disagree with you. Not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ha Ha Ha
No way he is going to pick up many Edwards voters,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not this one.
I will not ever, under any circumstances, vote for Donnie McClurkin's best buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adamocrat Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sorry, but Obama ain't getting my gay vote...
He definitely does not have the gay vote here in ATL. Too many homo-curing snake oil salesmen here have turned us off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
65. I take you won't be voting for Hillary either
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 11:38 PM by zulchzulu
Since you're playing the Purity Vote, you must certainly know that Hillary has declared homophobes endorsing her on her web site as well as a few on her payroll. Then there's Billy with that nutty uber-homophobic "Defense of Marriage Act" that he made so many homophobes beam with joy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm sure 0bama will get gay votes. If he's the nominee he'll get mine in the GE but not the primary
- and not with pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. He didn't pick up this one
My partner and I were Edwards supporters and Obama and his "ex-gay" pulpit-pounding pals can kiss my gay ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. I'm sure Barack will "embrace" each and every one of them.
At arm's length.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. Poor David Mixner - he would kiss me to get attention. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
54. It must be Obamanaut math to claim that 22 out of 59 is a "critical mass" of support
37 percent? Seems awfully close to Senator Obama's national poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC