Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:32 PM
Original message |
ARG POLL had Obama 51-40 in Illinois, even I will admit that's bullshit |
|
It's a crap poll, with crap numbers. If I was an Obama supporter and it showed Missiouri within 2 points while Rasmussen and other polls showed Hillary with a double digit lead, I'd be scared because the opposite of whatever ARG says is usually what happens. It's a great counter indicator.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Stop paying attention to polls. |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That is total stinking garbage. |
|
If I were them and I got those numbers I would have fudged them to bring them closer to reality.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He's FROM Illinois. Why is it odd for him to win his home state by a wide margin? |
Silent3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. You're missing her point |
|
Even as a Clinton supporter, the OP expects Obama to be ahead in Illinois by MORE than the 11 points the ARG poll gives him. He/she expects him to be winning by an even wider margin.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Oh, OK. I'm not much of a poll-watcher, so I tend to be a little vague on these things. |
|
So often they turn out to be wrong anyhow...
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I agree that ARG is crap |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 08:34 PM by NJSecularist
regardless of the circumstances.
But a recent Survey USA poll shows Hillary's lead down to 4.
Clinton 48 Obama 44
But I don't think Obama will win Missouri like the recent ARG survey says.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. ARG's polls have been garbage all year long |
|
They should do the dignified thing and go out of business and stop embarassing themselves.
|
Yurovsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Yep, those are bogus numbers ... |
|
Obama is going to win Illinois by at least 20%.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Not happening as we know |
|
I do expect Obama to pull over 60 in this one and get the delegate bonus
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It's a great counter indicator. Is this true? I don't know. But let's not get too devoted to polls |
godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. At this point, polls don't really matter |
|
Chances are that nothing final will be decided for the Democrats on Tuesday. I heard (MSNBC) that Clinton may end up with about a 100 delegate lead but not enough to seal the nomination. What will go forward however, is the all important momentum, based on delegates and number of states won etc.
|
loveangelc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Since when have you said ARG is bullshit????? You are quite full of it. |
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I'd say its possible IF Edwards voters went for Hillary in a big block |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-02-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
i`d say 15..he`s getting the chicago and a few other cities but hillary is popular here in illinois. it`s not going to be a blow out. shit my democratic party here is going for hillary funny obama stopped here while running for senate.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |