You know the Repukes are preparing their arsenal for the GE. Do you think they have....

[Sarah Ibarruri]

... swiftboater @-holes waiting on standby in case they're "needed?" What Rovian lies will the Repugnicans pull out of their @$$ this time?

[DesertFlower]

1. i'm sure they are prepared.

it's going to get nasty.

[Sarah Ibarruri]

2. It will be ugly. Repugnicans are always such bottomfeeders. nt

[Avalux]

3. If Hillary's the nominee, we know what to expect.

Bill, Monica, impeachment...they're ready.

[Sarah Ibarruri]

4. Oh yes. The Repukes are ready with the same SHIT lies they used to crucify the Clintons last time

Republicans are a plague on this country.

[DesertFlower]

5. they've been "chomping at the bit"

for years waiting to go after hillary.

[billbuckhead]

8. Yeah but the RepuKKKes never beat a Clinton in an election in decades

Obama beat Alan Keyes.

[The River]

6. They Only Need One

of 2 questions to be put into play.

Is America READY for a black President?

or

Is America READY for a woman President?

Whichever question it is, they will provide the answer for us.

No, we may not ready after all, they will say.
The polls will arrange to tell us it is a
dead heat horse-race that's too close to call.

After they steal it with black box voting the
talking heads will say too many people just
couldn't vote for the first _______ President.

How do you disprove it?

[cooolandrew]

7. ...

[Hoof Hearted]

9. Snarf! Good one!

He IS young enough, you know, LOL.

No matter who the nominee is, THEY'RE TOAST.

:toast:

[Hoof Hearted]

10. What did you do that for? It was funny!

[Turn CO Blue]

11. Many of the posters in this forum have already done all the R&D

for Rove and crew...


on edit: I want to clarify that I meant the above -REGARDLESS which candidate emerges. RoveCo or whomever is running the repub-prick campaign will just take the oft-repeated bashing points against H or O from straight off this board.

[enid602]

12. GOP

I'm sort of surprised to see the degree of competition among Republican candidates, especially in a year when many feel that their chances of winning the GE are so limited. This is not like the sacrificial offering of Bob Dole in '96. I fear they have a grand plan.

[AdHocSolver]

13. The Republicans have had 16 years preparing and testing their tactics for Clinton.

Americans have had 16 years to learn to respond to Clinton bashing. Obama is a new factor in the equation. He is not a thoroughly tested product, as is Clinton.

Moreover, Bill Clinton brought us NAFTA, media deregulation, so-called welfare "reform", and other policies that have been destructive to progressive policies and values. Hillary has touted her "experience" in the White House. That kind of experience does not bode well for the country.

I supported Edwards, and I still think he would be our best candidate, and make the best president for progressive policies. However, with him suspending his campaign (whatever that is supposed to mean to his supporters), I would sooner take a chance on Obama, although he is somewhat of an unknown quantity, rather than support Clinton who comes with so-o-o many negatives.

[Sarah Ibarruri]

14. They have. Not all, but a lot of the bashing of Clinton we've heard in this forum...

.. I'm sure are paid Republican operatives (I've posted a few times on my experiences with these Republican plants), who would benefit by destroying both, (not just one), candidates. They thereby bash both and create havoc, making it seem there's "no one to vote for", and setting up Repukes to say precisely that. My opinion? Ignore their Rovian behinds and proceed forward.

And by the way, I'm more in your camp of thinking on the current election. I, too, was an ardent Edwards supporter, and currently I agree with you.

[Thrill]

15. I heard on the Slate show on Potus that the Swith Boats have 100 mill

to go after McCain in the GE