Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama.. deep knowledge of foreign relations" - what are LAT editors smoking?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:17 AM
Original message
"Obama.. deep knowledge of foreign relations" - what are LAT editors smoking?
Yes, he "electrifies young voters" and has "flair for expression," but deep knowledge of foreign relations he does not have.

And to say that "Obama's mere presence in the White House to defuse anti-American passion around the world" is pathetic.

For me, this is my main objection to him. This is why I started supporting Biden. Because if there is an instability in the world - not necessarily a terrorist attack - I can see Obama stammering, calling for all sides to "exercise restraint" while McCain is sailing to the White House.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's code for Muslims will love us now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. what a disgusting thing for a Democrat to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's a popular guy with Muslims in Asia. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. William Kistol? Is that you???
disgusting. You should have your mouth washed out for that shit before you're chased back to Free Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Wow, what a Freep-shot. I can't
believe I'm reading this on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Your PNAC is showing. Time to find your people. They aren't here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. fwiw, undergrad degree in international relations from Columbia I think
and he's on SFRC under Biden (when not campaigning).

I'm with you on supporting Biden (foreign policy and military being the things more directly under control of the pres. anyway). I don't know if you're saying HRC > BO on this? I'd say they're both beginners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. She traveled the world as first lady, met with leaders and regular
people in many countries, got to understand the diverse political and cultural backgrounds of many countries. For example, we cannot expect a western style democracy in every culture in the world. I think that such insistence can even be offensive.

Such understandings cannot come from reading briefings but from actual travel and meeting of people in their natural background. And Clinton has done that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. I meant beginners compared to other candidates
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 AM by JoeIsOneOfUs
(Biden, Dodd, Richardson) I consider Clinton and Obama beginners. The first lady traveling doesn't impress me as experience because it's not decision-making. It's better than nothing, but not formal research, policy setting, voting, what have you.

B, D, and R have the travel experience, legislative/committee type background, and decision-making background.

Maybe Clinton is slightly ahead of Obama on this, but it's like comparing the freshmen and the sophomore to the professors to me. And I have NOT liked many of Clinton's foreign policy votes (Iraq, Iran).

Edit to add - I've never heard anyone suggest Obama or Clinton for Sec. of State, and as Biden used to say on the stump, at this point in our history, why would we elect someone for president who wouldn't be qualified to be Sec. of State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Agree with you 100 percent
And before the Iowa primary I posted something like that, that Biden, Dodd and Richardson were the best qualified on foreign policy.

And, yes, Clinton is slightly better than Obama based not only on her traveling as first lady, but also as her Senate membership on the Armed Services Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. another thought on the 1st lady travel stuff
I don't think flying in for a brief highly planned visit to a county gives understanding of the "real people" culture. It counts for something, but not like an ambassadorship or visit as a private citizen, NGO worker, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. A year ago, I watched her in a town meeting in New Hampshire right after she announced her run.
One of the first things she said was, "Americans are the hardest working people in the world."

So I'm guessing the only other countries she visited were lazy countries.

She hasn't ever met the regular people of a third world country, or she couldn't believe that and she wouldn't say something so blatently false.

I hate to be the one to dispute her misunderstanding, but Americans are not the hardest working people in the world. We wouldn't want to be. We don't want to work 16 hour days like the regular people in third world countries do, in sweat shops, in near slave labor conditions.

Maybe what she meant is that thanks to NAFTA, it won't be long until 'Americans are the hardest working people in the world.' So get used to it, New Hampshire.

Either Hillary is ignorant of the reality of the world, or she is a pandering liar. I'm not sure which it is, but when I heard her say that, i knew she wasn't my candidate. I want a candidate who is aware of the greater world; I want a candidate who doesn't just say crapola because she thinks people want to hear crapola.

Sorry if I sound negative here, I know it's not some major thing like a war vote in congress, but if she will say stuff like that, what won't she say?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh and you think WarBird Hillary is going to go far in healing wounds with the world?
LAUGH - you should do stand up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. it was deep enough to know Iraq was a dumb war (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Foreign Policy Advisors Obama Got From the Clinton WH Are The Ones Who Were Against Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. They grilled him; sounds like he aced the exam
==both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were seen entering and leaving the editorial board room in recent days.==

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/01/endorse.html

Any more questions, Mr. Everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Who is they? Seeing that there is a revolving door
in the LAT top floor where no one can stay there for more than few months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. The editorial board...that's how endorsements work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Obama's foreign relations knowledge is vastly superior to McCain's--
McCain, believe it or not, is NOT a foreign policy expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. They're smoking cigars Teddy gave them.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Anyone with a "deep knowledge of foreign relations" would not have sparked anti-American protests
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 01:33 AM by Skip Intro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. I don't know, I'd like to try it though, lol. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. LA Times was bought out by
Chicago Tribune. Make sense now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. yes it does. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Rigth. And if one will search DU, there are a lot more hateful
comments about LAT than praising ones.

Now, I am not sure. I seem to remember that back in 2004, before the general elections, I asked who was endorsed by LAT and the reply was that it does not endorse candidates..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC