Latest Field poll from California is not reliable.

[geek tragedy]

It lists 17% of people who voted early as 'undecided.'

Another 20% as voting for someone besides Obama and Clinton. I highly doubt John Edwards did better in CA than in SC.


http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2264.pdf

Precinct (.57): Clinton 40, Obama 31, Others 6, Undecided 18
Mail/early (.43): Clinton 31, Obama 32, Others 20, Undecided 17

[AX10]

1. Oye vey! how can someone who already voted...

be "undecided"? :crazy:

Also, I believe Edwards supporters will break for Hillary.

[NJSecularist]

2. Here we go with the Hillbots trying to dismiss the authenticity of another poll

Yes, there are plenty of undecided voters, but other polls have shown the same thing.

The Field Poll from CA has a reputation of being accurate

[geek tragedy]

4. I'm a solid Obama guy.

But, those numbers just don't make sense.

They list the people who will vote live and the people who have already voted separately.

How can the people who already voted be undecided?

[LiberalFighter]

5. Did you read the statement? Once one has voted they are no longer undecided.

[ZinZen]

3. Most of the polls I have been looking at

have a double digit undecided factor in them. My take- the race is tight and fluid.