sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:31 PM
Original message |
From a strategic sense which candidate is more likely to unite the Rs? |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They will come out in droves to vote against her.
|
PassingFair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Obama actually pulls moderate Repubs while scoring high with Independents. |
|
Overall it would be better for our nation to have a president that creates a wider base of support instead of yet another in a long line of divisive figures who hardens the lines between right and left leaving very little space in the middle.
|
southern_dem
(587 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:34 PM
Original message |
|
may not be her fault, but it's the truth.
|
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Hillary. If anything can bring that party together, it will be mutual hatred of her. |
|
I am not looking forward to months of rehashing the 90s if she's the nominee. Id' rather have a hot poker stuck in my eye.
|
Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Neither, the Republicans are a mess |
|
Hillary and Obama don't figure into their problems. If it's Hillary, the neocons would try to use her as a device to rebuild their movement, and that would lead to huge battle especially since McCain is not neocon. If it's Obama, the Republicans will be struggling so hard to be racist and divisive without appearing racist and divisive that they'll make a mess of things.
|
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I have not yet met a Republican who didn't just dislike Hil but despised her.
Look at 2000, Bush a bumbling idiot who was basically campaigning against peace and prosperity was able to win (cheated) a close election by running against a former member of the Clinton machine.
|
Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Actually, now that I think about it, Obama could be a better rallying point for Rs |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 01:43 PM by Onlooker
Obama is definitely more liberal than Hillary, which I why I support him. But, it would probably be better for the Republicans to try to rally around the anti-liberal mentality than to rally around anti Clinton sentiment.
The Clinton haters aren't going to vote for Obama. They might try to sound more reasonable, but even now you can tell that's their lie. At any rate, I think Obama has the campaign organization to defeat McCain or Romney, and Clinton does not.
|
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. I think your analysis is off base |
|
Obama consistently polls much better among moderate Rs and Independents.
Hil's unfavorability ratings among these groups are very high.
|
marlakay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
7. My republican bosses HATE her... |
|
while Obama they don't even mention. What does that say?
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I don't think ANY candidate can unite them. If McCain gets the nom, |
|
Cheney is gonna have to rally his rightwing cretins, like Rush, and order them to GOTV for the sake of the party. But there's just no "enthusiasm."
As far as the Dem choices go, I think the rabid right hate both candidates. The wimmen-haters, the racists, they probably are on that GOP team in fairly equal numbers.
I think they are demoralized, though, those Republicans. They may just stay home and get drunk. Fine with me!
|
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. If the Repukes have shown anything they have shown that they will close ranks |
|
for a win.
See: GWB, Arnold, even Lieberman who won with heavy republican support
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Arnold and Holy Joe won because DEMOCRATS crossed over. |
|
They also got Indys. Those two aren't representative of the dynamic at all.
GWB is closer to the mark, but even GWB got some D fools, as well.
Not as many as the first two, though.
But Arnold got Dems in a big way. So did Holy Joe--the GOP candidate got almost no votes in that contest.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I bet Dem Candidates for Congress want Obama to win the nomination |
sidwill
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Obama's coatails will be prodigous, Hil's meh no so much. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message |