Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey's Bergen Record Also Endorses Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:10 PM
Original message
New Jersey's Bergen Record Also Endorses Obama
Endorsements for presidential nominations
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Comment on this story Email this story Printer friendly version
IT IS EXTRAORDINARY: For the first time in decades, voters are not rubber-stamping anointed presidential candidates on either side. The race for the Democratic and Republican nominations could run straight to the floor of their respective conventions. We believe its important to endorse in both races. We recognize it may appear contradictory to endorse both a Republican and Democrat. How can this page consistently advocate for a woman's right to choose and then endorse a Republican? Or question the courting of special-interest labor organizations and back a Democrat?

In a primary, two blocs of voters are choosing from two disparate groups. And in New Jersey, independent voters may declare a party affiliation on Tuesday and vote in either primary.

Our choices are not a final endorsement for president. This page does not have a Democratic or Republican agenda; there are issues important to us that transcend party affiliation. However, on Tuesday, New Jersey voters will choose a Republican and a Democratic nominee. And so must we.

For Democrats: Obama

The Democratic field has been winnowed down to two: Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama. This is not, nor should it be, a campaign about race or gender. But it is exciting to see both a black man and a woman vie for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Both candidates advocate for health care for all Americans. Their plans differ in methods, but not in intent. Clinton, who has served longer in the Senate, was an early supporter of a U.S. troop presence in Iraq. Obama has been consistently against the Iraq war. Yet it is unfair to Clinton to use hindsight on Iraq to determine the best presidential nominee.

We do not dismiss Clinton's years in the Senate or her years as first lady. But she has served as an elected official for only seven years. And she comes with baggage; most troubling, her husband, former President Bill Clinton. So far, she has been either incapable or unwilling to rein him in. And it was Bill Clinton who injected ugly matters of race into the campaign.

We also are chilled at the prospect of two families - Bush and Clinton - governing this great democracy for more than two decades. We cannot move forward if we continue to embrace leadership mired in the past and personal visions of dynasty.

Obama's rise in popularity is worth noting. The power of the Obama candidacy has been in style and tone. When both Democratic candidates espouse similar views on domestic policy, the ability to deliver becomes the deciding factor. Obama may have less time in the Senate than Clinton, but he is a skilled state and federal legislator. And his experience as an advocate in Chicago gives him firsthand knowledge of the challenges facing America's urban centers. Cities have been given short shrift by both Democrats and Republicans in this campaign.

Candidate Obama is labeled a change agent in this election. Yet exactly what does "change" mean? It is naïve to believe that a candidate for "change" equates to a president who can effect "transformative change." It is easier to promise than to deliver. However, Obama is the better choice to bring a new tone to Washington and the nation. Obama can reach beyond the partisan trenches.

Democrats will make history either way: A black man or a woman will be their presidential nominee. But the stakes are higher than making history. Democrats have to choose the candidate qualified to lead a nation and win an election. That candidate is Obama.


http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/editorials/Endorsements_for_presidential_nominations.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is great because Bergen County is big Republican stronghold, plus HRC visited this area and desperately needs this area if she is going to get NJ. People in our state do read the Star Ledger and in Bergen we read the Record. Go Team Obama. I've been saying for the longest NJ isn't automatically in Clinton's pocket. You have to fight for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Woo hoo!!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. NOPE! Obama isn't the "anointed" one
that's for sure..and I'm liking it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC