|
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 02:30 PM by Heaven and Earth
Since style has taken over as the most talked about characteristic of our two remaining presidential candidates, its important to remember the reason that Hillary is considered polarizing. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but Bill and Hillary Clinton didn't go into the White House planning to turn half the country against them. That is what they were left with after Republicans, out of desperation to remain relevant, jumped into the gutter and dragged Bill and Hillary in after them. Bill Clinton was trying to undermine the whole Reagan conservative critique of government as inherently unworkable for the average person, and they couldn't have that. Remember the Bill Kristol memo warning that if Democrats got national healthcare, they'd be the natural governing party for another generation?
Now comes Barack Obama, building a reputation of being a uniter, able to create high youth turnouts in a single bound. It's been really impressive watching him attain that particular political holy grail. Seriously, damned impressive. Even Republicans are falling in love. If Obama wins, he's going to make the government a lot more liberal/progressive than the conservative Mecca it's been under Bush. You have to admit that, even if you think he's a complete centrist. At what point will the conservative survival instinct kick in? It has to, you know, or the conservative movement will die. They cannot let Obama get the credit for saving the country from this conservative-created quagmire. They have two alternatives: they can try to destroy him, or cooperate and claim he was a conservative after the fact. The second one is the better option, but of course, we can't allow them to claim him either.
Here's the question: Which is more likely, in your opinion? That they try to destroy him, or they let him succeed then claim him as one of their own? If they try the first option, Obama may end up as polarizing as Clinton.
|