Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much did Mark Penn pay the NY Times to run an attack ad on Obama on the front page?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:53 PM
Original message
How much did Mark Penn pay the NY Times to run an attack ad on Obama on the front page?
Nuclear Leaks and Response Tested Obama in Senate

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/us/politics/03exelon.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin



An above-the-fold front page article, complete with a photo of nuclear power plants looming over homes, that tells us that:

--Obama has contributors in the nuclear energy industry

--As a U.S. Senator he introduced legislation to require nuclear energy plants to notify state and local officials when there is any kind of a leak, even one that is below federally acceptable levels

--The repug-controlled Congress pushed back, including committee chairman, industry lapdog, and all-around maniac James Inhofe

--Several times Obama revised the legislation, weakening it in an attempt to create a bill he could get passed

--from the article:

Asked why Mr. Obama had cited it as an accomplishment while campaigning for president, the campaign noted that after the senator introduced his bill, nuclear plants started making such reports on a voluntary basis. The campaign did not directly address the question of why Mr. Obama had told Iowa voters that the legislation had passed.

Nuclear safety advocates are divided on whether Mr. Obama’s efforts yielded any lasting benefits. David A. Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists agreed that “it took the introduction of the bill in the first place to get a reaction from the industry.”

<snip>

Others say that turning the whole matter over to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as Mr. Obama’s revised bill would have done, played into the hands of the nuclear power industry, which they say has little to fear from the regulators. Mr. Obama seemed to share those concerns when he told a New Hampshire newspaper last year that the commission “is a moribund agency that needs to be revamped and has become a captive of the industry it regulates.”


--Obama mistakenly said on the campaign trail (once?) that he had passed nuclear legislation. This is, of course, untrue. The legislation only passed out of committee, it never became law.

--Obama has reintroduced the revised legislation.



This is page one news? A congress member getting campaign contributions from industry is not exactly news at all.

In a repug Congress, Obama being unable to pass legislation strengthening regulation against industry is front page news to the Times?

Obama tried several times to revise the legislation to get it passed. This is front page news to the Times?

Obama was wrong when he said on the campaign trail that he had passed nuclear legislation. It's hard to believe this would be intentional. Candidates today know that every single word they utter is monitored by their opposition. It's unlikely Obama would knowingly say something that could so easily be shown to be false. My guess would be he was referring to getting the bill through committee. Again, this is front page news that a candidate said something that was wrong? At most, this is usually relegated to a small fact-check article buried in the middle of the paper.

This article, two days before New Yorkers vote, brought to you by the same newspaper who gave us the Iraq war, seems nothing more than a large campaign donation from the Times to Hillary. Once again the Times shames itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spam Alert!
and a misleading headline to boot.

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like they didn't run an attack ad against Clinton on the front page the day before?
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 02:59 PM by Tom Rinaldo
How come anytime anyone has something negative to say about Obama there ALWAYS is something sinister behind it. Sometimes, OK, I can buy that, but always?

By and large Obama has gotten much more sympathetic press coverage since this campaign began than Hillary Clinton. Lately the ratio has shifted away from being so tilted toward Obama which probably explains why you are noticing the negative stories now so much, there rarely were any before so it is a relatively new experience. Believe me, Hillary Clinton supporters expect them, all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Typical Obama Supporter Thread,
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC