Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time: More on the don't-wait-up for California thing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:42 PM
Original message
Time: More on the don't-wait-up for California thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've identified this as a strategy of corrupt CA county election officials--
who owe their allegiance to corporate election system vendors (Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia), and not to the voters--to undermine the reforms of the new Sec of State, Debra Bowen, which are aimed at better transparency in the vote tabulation, and are coming down hard on corporate lying and fraud.

You can find an example of their media strategy in The Contra Costa Times today, an article all from the point of view of some of the most bad actor county officials--San Diego, Contra Costa, Riverside and San Bernardino--who are trying to create a kind of "hysteria" about slow vote counts, to be blamed on SoS Bowen's reforms. SD, Riverside and SB recently sued SoS Bowen to stop her improved new auditing rules. They just lost in the appellate court (1/29/08), but it is indicative of their anti-transparency, pro-corporate attitude.

The Contra Costa Times article can be found here (Comment #2--I reply to it.)
Election Reform, Fraud and Related News. Sunday 02/03/08 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x496612

Also see "California Election Integrity Assessment 2008." I discuss this manipulated "slow vote count" talk in the section "CALIFORNIA: where to look for election integrity problems Feb 5," and I discuss these "bad actor" county officials at length in the article.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=141x29363
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interesting. Thanks for providing this useful information (as always). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks for the info - Debra Bowen will stay firm, however
with our support. Getting it right and with a paper trail is more important than getting it quick and dirty for the benefit of the "instant news" media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, I have no doubt at all that SHE will stay firm. The woman has a spine of steel.
However, the corporate media/corrupt county election officials, and, some say, Rove "dirty tricks" campaign against the previous reforming Calif Sec of State (Kevin Shelley) started just like this: with complaints in the corporate media, by these corrupt officials, about Shelley's reforms. Next it was, 'Shelley is corrupt'--entirely bogus charges, but enough to drive him out of office, because he had no money for lawyers (tells you something about Shelley) and he couldn't do his job. It is essentially the same gang--minus Connie McCormack (who resigned Dec 07). San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, and the election officials' prez and spokesman from Contra Costa--Steve Weir.

McCormack is gone, yeah. (So is Rove--at least from the White House.) And the political landscape is somewhat changed, due entirely to citizen activism (especially regarding Dem politicos any longer defending paperless voting--now they have to run for cover from the voters as much as from the e-voting corporations and their county shills).

But their latest moves clearly indicate that these county election officials and corporate vendors have not given up. They just sued Bowen! To prevent better audit rules! They're yammering in the media about the "slow" vote count. They may just be trying to cast blame away from themselves (richly deserved blame), but you've got to look at the recent history here, and the utter lack of shame of these people. A former Diebold salesperson now the head of elections in San Diego! I mean, jeez. Could the corruption get any more obvious?

Meanwhile, McCormack is whining against Bowen (and strategizing!) in the "Whittier Daily News," as follows:

"'It's hard enough when you have a support system that goes all the way to the state level. That's not what has been going on in California. It's just the opposite.'

"McCormack's biggest complaint concerns Secretary of State Debra Bowen's decision to decertify several electronic voting systems.

"'There's no evidence of a problem,' McCormack said. 'Riverside has had 2,040 successful electronic elections with absolutely no attempt to rig the equipment. It's all theoretical. I just got sick of it.'

"The administration of elections should not be politicized, she said.

"'Unfortunately I think it has been by several secretaries of state in California and elsewhere now,' McCormack said. 'There's a perception been created that there are some people who think there is manipulation of the electoral process by election officials.'" (my emphasis) (MORE)

http://www.whittierdailynews.com/ci_8153626?source=rss
Originally posted here (no. 7):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x496612

---------

Jee-suz! The shamelessness! Now, the people who want transparency (according to Zogy, 92% of Americans) are POLITICIZING the election process. McCormack corporatized it. And now that we want it un-corporatized--and returned to normal, transparent, honest, open elections--THAT's "political."

McCormack complains that she doesn't have the "support system" in Sacramento of Diebold shill, SoS Bruce McPherson (appointed by Schwarzenegger to replace the "swift-boated" Shelley) to secretize and corporatize our elections any more. And so she "got sick of it."

But neither Seiler in San Diego--who should be crawling off to a desert to do penance--nor McCormack, who should go with her--has gone away.

They're strategizing Bowen's demise, Featherman. Part of the strategy is to do a slowdown on voting results next Tuesday, and blame it on Bowen's reforms. And McCormack just told us the other part--that to be against Diebold and "trade secret" vote counting is to be PARTISAN.

It's no skin off her nose that Diebold's CEO was a Bush-Cheney campaign chair and major fundraiser, who promised in writing to "deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush-Cheney in 2004."

I swear, this is Rove talking. Whatever crimes you are committing, get out there with an accusation of the same crime against someone else--to deflect attention, and to fuzz peoples' minds.

As I said, things have changed--somewhat. But the forces against transparent elections have big, big money, are extremely powerful and dangerous, and they think long-term. They knew there would be an election reform movement. Their fallback position is the optiscans. Whatever happens, they make money. And if the elections are just a little harder to rig--as they are now in Calif--well, that's just a challenge. They've made so many gains toward their fascist/corporate ends, they can afford patience. And they have so many ways to strike at honest officials. Using dishonest ones, like McCormack and Seiler is just one of them.

I think we'll win our country back, in the end. I don't think it's going to be easy. And we should take nothing for granted. I took Shelley for granted--that we had some election safety in Calif. Then the bad guys struck. And it was dizzying how quickly it happened. But, another lesson learned, in navigating our way out of BushWorld. This time, a lot of more people are watching, and are actively involved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC