Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRC calls out Obama saying he "didn't face anyone who ran attack ads against him,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:13 PM
Original message
HRC calls out Obama saying he "didn't face anyone who ran attack ads against him,"
Clinton, 60, of New York, said on ABC's ``This Week'' that she is better able to withstand Republican attacks and attract voters who ``know how serious the issues are that we face.''

``In his prior election in Illinois, Senator Obama didn't face anyone who ran attack ads against him,'' she said, referring to Obama's Senate race. ``He ran against a very weak opponent, without resources or credibility.''
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080203/pl_bloomberg/akpicpihizpi;_ylt=Ah8F.8Dg4jColPuY4BzpLp2s0NUE
:eyes:


SHE obviously is completely used to attacks, and that is her point - problem is: she continues on to say "`He ran against a very weak opponent, without resources or credibility.''
:wtf:
At what point does she realize that Obama is now running against the famous "Clinton Machine" and doing amazingly well? He's running against her and everything she & Bill can throw at him... I think Obama has been proven quite strong. And I think her using this arguement makes her look a little desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Michelle just responded in L.A....
Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jkshaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Too right, Token!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Yes she did...and then some! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. you mean other than Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think she has point. He ran against Alan Keyes for the love of
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 06:19 PM by BlueStateGirl
God.

It is not to say that he can't withstand the attacks, but honestly he has never had too.

She has. And I don't think he is running against EVERYTHING she and Bill can throw against him. This really is kids stuff compared to the General. And I think, if he is the nominee, the Repubs will have to get nasty. I support Hillary, but I think the Repubs would have a harder time beating Sen. Obama. They will be merciless. He has never faced that. And the so called "Clinton Machine" is nothing compared to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wonder how few really know he ran against keyes. bet very few. but glad she
did not mention his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:28 PM
Original message
Who did Hillary run against?
Rick Lazio? ROFLMAO!

She got bailed out when Rudy needed to leave the race because of cancer.

She has never faced a legitimate opponent either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Senator Obama has never had to withstand a Republican
onslaught. Forget about campaigns. The RW in the this country has made a cottage industry out of attacking Hillary Clinton and her husband . Get back to me when RW radio spends two years accusing Obama of murder, or Jerry Falwell releases the Obama Chronicles, or the Obama children are savaged by the right. Barak Obama has never been in the arena the Clintons have been in. Ever. Not even close. And if anyone thinks the Republicans won't attack Mr. Hope and Change the way they attacked the Clintons is living a dream world. And one thing the "Clinton Machine" has proven is that they can take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Very well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Clinton machine was MIA the last 7 yrs when Dem issues and Dem candidates were being
attacked constantly.

Where was the Clinton machine then if it refused to work FOR all Dems?

The CLINTON MACHINE showed up at various times when Bush was under attack - they supported Bush.

The CLINTON MACHINE showed up when Scooter Libby was under attack - they supported Scooter Libby.

The CLINTON MACHINE showed up when Lieberman was being attacked - they supported Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. May I ask you what your post has to do with anything I posted?
What does anything you posted have to do with whether or not Barak Obama is as equipped as Hillary Clinton to withstand the RW attacks that are surely coming in the GE?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Point being is that Clinton MACHINE only works for Clintons and the Dem PARTY be damned.
Dem ISSUES be damned.

Dem CANDIDATES be damned.

Dem NOMINEES be damned.

Dem VOTERS be damned.

THAT is what you want to continue for our party? That's exactly the way Vushes operated in the Republican party. Set up a machine to only service their agenda at the expense of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Perhaps I do not agree with you? Could it possibly be that simple?
Maybe I don't see the Clintons the same way you do?

I like Senator Obama. I will cheerfully vote for him if he is the nominee. You will not see me attack him or his supporters. It at I just that I prefer Senator Clinton to Senator Obama. And one of those reasons is that I believe she is better equipped to deal with the coming Republican attacks. She has been living with them for 16 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Maybe you should read the National Security Archives, because it's not OPINION
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 09:13 PM by blm
about the Clintons' constant protection of the Bushes, it is a FACT. And it has blown back against our party and this nation in horrific ways.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

Truth Matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Okay , so I read the first page of your link and what I got from it
is that Bill Clinton didn't aggressively follow up on reagan Bush scandals because he wanted a more united country,and he realized that he would have to work with Repubs and he wanted to foster a spirit of bipartisanship. Wow. Who does that sound like? I don't exactly hear Obama attacking Bush... ever.... or calling for impeachment. In fact, he wants to reach out to Repubs and independents in the spirit of a more united country. Let's hope, if he is elected, he is not rewarded for it the same way Clinton was.

If there is something more specific at this link you would like me to read, could you kindly direct me to it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Yeah, except Clinton's political benefactor in Arkansas was Jackson Stephens.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 10:30 PM by blm
Jackson Stephens who staked WalMart. Jackson Stephens whose longtime ally was GHWBush and they both brought BCCI into this country. BCCI was only the biggest terrorist funding operation in the world.

GHWBush expected to be impeached after BCCI report was released in Dec 1992. Jackson Stephens underwrote Bill Clinton's primary campaign. GHWBush runds the worst campaign in history, BCCI report is handed to incoming president Clinton. The report and all its outstanding matters are deep-sixed throughout the 90s. Matters involving Stephens, Marc Rich, AQ Khan, Bin Ladens, Dubai and Saudi royals.

Nothing for Americans to be concerned about, eh?

The BCCI report can be easily found with any search. Its list of Outstanding Matters at the end is very educational for those who care about their country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the Repubs will be FAR worse than anything Hillary has thrown at him
She really hasn't just made shit up out of whole cloth and then spent millions of dollars making sure every American hears the lies over and over until their ears bleed.

You may believe the Clintons are making shit up too. But even if they are, it is NOTHING like what the Repubs will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The media has helped Obama in every way they could and he's STILL behind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Talk to the hand, Hill... cuz nobody's listenin any longer..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Nobody, really? Seriously, you want to make such a stupid
statement that is so obviously wrong. You pulled that right out of your ass, didn't you. Just go away while the grown-ups talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you believe the Clinton Campaign went negative on Obama
You might as well believe in the tooth fairy also. That's the point. This is a Democratic Primary race. Only Democrats are voting now, and any campaign that is thought to go too negative on a fellow Democrat while appealing for Democratic votes risks being rejected for that reason alone. The rules are VERY different against the Republicans in the General Election.

Having said that you have a good point. Obama has run an effective campaign for the type of race he now is in against Clinton. But Hillary Clinton does has a good point. Obama has never remotely been in the type of contest that he will face in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Obama can take the Clinton's attacks
and come out on top. He'll be fine. This is just dumb for her to say. Going up against the Clinton's is the best test anyone can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. WHERE was Clinton 'machine' that Dems PAID FOR for years while BushRove were attacking
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 06:58 PM by blm
Dems and Dem issues and smearing every Democrat who stuck their necks out to oppose Bush the last 7 years?

Clintons stood WITH Bush publicly on the biggest issues of the last 3 election cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. damn straight, blm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Where was the machine that's supporting Barack now?
Where was the Kennedy/Kerry machine?

Kennedy stood side-by-side with bush on NCLB. Kerry never got the Kennedy machine in action to counteract the Swiftboaters. Whatever effort they made, it failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. They showed UP for most every battle and never expected to have to fight Clinton machine
that was throwing IN to protect Bush at every serious battle.

Clinton machine showed up to defend Bush on terrorism and Iraq war decisions, and Bill Clinton LED the machine on that support of Bush.

Clinton machine showed up to defend Scooter Libby.

Clinton machine showed up to defend Joe Lieberman.

Clinton machine showed up to join Bush's lie against Kerry.

Where was the Clinton machine on ToraBora? Call for Rumsfeld's firing in 2003-4? Downing Street Memos? Alito filibuster? Iraq withdrawal? They would NEVER SHOW UP for any of these battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama hasn't seen the republican campaign against him yet, he's a virtual unknown to most Americans
It would/will be whithering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. no, actually he isn't a virtual unknow to most Americans. Not anymore
and that's withering- no h.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pick up yourself hilary...you're
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 06:36 PM by zidzi
down in the slimey sewer where mark penn resides..nice goin' ,but I saw that in you..way back in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, she faced them, and folded. No thanks.
Time to try a leader. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sad when the highest someone can look up is only to gutter level.
Just plain sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Funny, she just accused Obama of "looking for a fight" a couple debates ago.
Besides that, she is one to talk about the issues. This whole campaign she has been doing anythig to avoid answering questions. She has planted audience questions, she was going to laugh off the remaining campaign answers (nobody liked her laugh), new tatic, attack Obama repeatedly for weeks,you see the pattern here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC