Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To the cynics:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:10 AM
Original message
To the cynics:
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 12:47 AM by FightTheRight89
--Deleted by the poster--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. you are the same people who drank kool-aid in jonestown
Seriously, accusing your opponents of being the same people who didn't want to end slavery or fight fascism? Do you have any idea how stupid and cultist that sounds?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm not accusing you of that.
I'm sure you want it just as much as I do.
But you don't believe it can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes She *CAN*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Difference between Obama and Clinton... illustrated right here by a Clintonista....

Obama's campaign is about ALL of us... hence... Yes *WE* Can.

Hillary's campaign is about HER...and her feeling of entitlement to the Presidency.... hence... Yes *SHE* can.


Obama focuses on what's best for all of America.... Hillary focuses on what's best for her.


Thanks for illustrating the difference so clearly with the changing of one word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. *She* Embodies the womankind, for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. what you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Arguing for "Hope" is the oldest & cheapest debate tactic on the books.
Doesn't surprise me that the under 30 crowd would fall for it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Indeed we fell for it in the 60s & 70s and we did not even fully
understand the grip the corporations held over us yet. Nor did we have the in-depth understanding of world-wide problems such as global warming and a national debt that is strangling us already.

Many of us have worked for years to end problems like hunger and poverty only to see it get worse not only in developing nations but also right here at home. If we are discouraged it is because even when we had someone in office who cared about these issues what progress we made just seemed to be a drop in the bucket. So you are telling us that we can take on these national and international problems with no money left in the pot and it is all going to be accomplished by hope?

We need hope but we also need reality. The fight is going to be long and hard regardless of who is the president. Those of us you claim to have been against all those events will still be fighting long after the next president is no longer in office not because we hope but because we know it is the right thing to do. We just are not jumping up and down in a victory dance simply because we hear hope and change are just around the corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. "Change" "Hope"
is the oldest and cheapest debate tactic on the books. . . Worth repeating and repeating. . . and here I thought 'kool-aid' crowd was on its way out with GWB and company...looks like the Obama "herd" is following suit. Sad. Must be "peer" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. He's on to it. Perhaps he found himself on the wrong side of a "Hope"
debate when he was in the 6th grade & it sunk in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, jeez - another rambling "rah rah" post
This is getting tiresome :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. laying it on a bit thick
Just because don't support Obama doesn't equate to slave holders or those against man on moon mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I don't understand why electing a woman isn't more important than electing a black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Neither is important in itself.
I don't think anyone should vote for Obama simply because he's black. I also don't think anyone should vote for Clinton because she's a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Did you read what I wrote?
I'm curious, because it seems like you didn't and just made a snide remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Did you just repurpose some high school valedictorian speech?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes, I did.
I just copied and pasted. You caught me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. It is out of line to say he is a false messiah? WTH? Does that


mean , he is in fact, the messiah?


I resent this post and it's implication that if one supports Sen. Clinton instead of Sen. Obama that they are hopless defeatists.

And That some how Obama supporters are the direct decsendents of the founding fathers, aboltionists, pioneers, and the GIs that stormed Omaha beach. GMAB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. Suddenly, I'm feeling very, very cold.
Mass rallies.
Large groups of people chanting slogans in unison.
Repetitive-phrase speeches.
Emotional frenzy.
Identification with the leader.
A bandwagon that the media and party establishment jumps on.
Constant use of the word "we".
Messianic fervor.
Appeals to unity, organicism, the nation as a surrogate family.
Appeals to feelings, denigration of deliberative thought.
Invocation of will, desire, magical thinking.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes, very cold.
I also don't appreciate being insulted by being called a "cynic" when I disagree. Reminds me of being called "unpatriotic" and a "traitor" when I opposed the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightTheRight89 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well sorry if my post sounded a little fascist.
I just hope for the future and see that in Barack Obama and hate hearing WE CAN'T.

But yeah, fuck hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. It's terrible you felt you had to delete that
There was nothing fascist about that post at all. These people are sick in the head haters. They just want to tear something down, anything down. They've been wanting to tear something down since the 60's. Ignore them. The rest of us know the power is in building up and bringing together. Yes We Can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Fascism is...
... an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes. The key attribute of fascism is intolerance of others: other religions, languages, political views, economic systems, cultural practices, etc." (Wikipedia)

When you call me a "sick in the head hater," you are demonstrating intolerance of another's political view. When you say, "they just want to tear something down, anything down," you are, again, demonstrating intolerance of another group's political view. You are good. We are bad, and we thereby justify our contempt for you. That is the basis of fascism.

(And just so you know... a large component of Obama's base is White men who were "trying to tear something down" in the 60s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. No, they were trying to build up
I am not intolerant of anybody trying to build up, not even Hillary's supporters. But there are none of that type of person in this thread. This thread is full of haters who demonstrated INTOLERANCE OF ANOTHER'S POLITICAL VIEW and intimidated the OP into deleting a very beautiful post. It's disgusting and sick in the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. Oh my...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC