FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:10 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 12:47 AM by FightTheRight89
--Deleted by the poster--
|
bidenista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. you are the same people who drank kool-aid in jonestown |
|
Seriously, accusing your opponents of being the same people who didn't want to end slavery or fight fascism? Do you have any idea how stupid and cultist that sounds?
|
FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'm not accusing you of that. |
|
I'm sure you want it just as much as I do. But you don't believe it can happen.
|
AGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Difference between Obama and Clinton... illustrated right here by a Clintonista.... |
|
Obama's campaign is about ALL of us... hence... Yes *WE* Can.
Hillary's campaign is about HER...and her feeling of entitlement to the Presidency.... hence... Yes *SHE* can.
Obama focuses on what's best for all of America.... Hillary focuses on what's best for her.
Thanks for illustrating the difference so clearly with the changing of one word.
|
AGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. *She* Embodies the womankind, for me. |
stillrockin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Arguing for "Hope" is the oldest & cheapest debate tactic on the books. |
|
Doesn't surprise me that the under 30 crowd would fall for it though.
|
jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
16. Indeed we fell for it in the 60s & 70s and we did not even fully |
|
understand the grip the corporations held over us yet. Nor did we have the in-depth understanding of world-wide problems such as global warming and a national debt that is strangling us already.
Many of us have worked for years to end problems like hunger and poverty only to see it get worse not only in developing nations but also right here at home. If we are discouraged it is because even when we had someone in office who cared about these issues what progress we made just seemed to be a drop in the bucket. So you are telling us that we can take on these national and international problems with no money left in the pot and it is all going to be accomplished by hope?
We need hope but we also need reality. The fight is going to be long and hard regardless of who is the president. Those of us you claim to have been against all those events will still be fighting long after the next president is no longer in office not because we hope but because we know it is the right thing to do. We just are not jumping up and down in a victory dance simply because we hear hope and change are just around the corner.
|
CatnHat
(669 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
is the oldest and cheapest debate tactic on the books. . . Worth repeating and repeating. . . and here I thought 'kool-aid' crowd was on its way out with GWB and company...looks like the Obama "herd" is following suit. Sad. Must be "peer" thing.
|
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. He's on to it. Perhaps he found himself on the wrong side of a "Hope" |
|
debate when he was in the 6th grade & it sunk in.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Oh, jeez - another rambling "rah rah" post |
|
This is getting tiresome :(
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. laying it on a bit thick |
|
Just because don't support Obama doesn't equate to slave holders or those against man on moon mission.
|
billbuckhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. I don't understand why electing a woman isn't more important than electing a black? |
FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Neither is important in itself. |
|
I don't think anyone should vote for Obama simply because he's black. I also don't think anyone should vote for Clinton because she's a woman.
|
FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Did you read what I wrote? |
|
I'm curious, because it seems like you didn't and just made a snide remark.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Did you just repurpose some high school valedictorian speech? |
FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I just copied and pasted. You caught me.
|
BlueStateGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
14. It is out of line to say he is a false messiah? WTH? Does that |
|
mean , he is in fact, the messiah?
I resent this post and it's implication that if one supports Sen. Clinton instead of Sen. Obama that they are hopless defeatists.
And That some how Obama supporters are the direct decsendents of the founding fathers, aboltionists, pioneers, and the GIs that stormed Omaha beach. GMAB.
|
Dogmudgeon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Suddenly, I'm feeling very, very cold. |
|
Mass rallies. Large groups of people chanting slogans in unison. Repetitive-phrase speeches. Emotional frenzy. Identification with the leader. A bandwagon that the media and party establishment jumps on. Constant use of the word "we". Messianic fervor. Appeals to unity, organicism, the nation as a surrogate family. Appeals to feelings, denigration of deliberative thought. Invocation of will, desire, magical thinking.
--p!
|
LadyVT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
I also don't appreciate being insulted by being called a "cynic" when I disagree. Reminds me of being called "unpatriotic" and a "traitor" when I opposed the war.
|
FightTheRight89
(307 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Well sorry if my post sounded a little fascist. |
|
I just hope for the future and see that in Barack Obama and hate hearing WE CAN'T.
But yeah, fuck hope.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. It's terrible you felt you had to delete that |
|
There was nothing fascist about that post at all. These people are sick in the head haters. They just want to tear something down, anything down. They've been wanting to tear something down since the 60's. Ignore them. The rest of us know the power is in building up and bringing together. Yes We Can!
|
LadyVT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
... an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes. The key attribute of fascism is intolerance of others: other religions, languages, political views, economic systems, cultural practices, etc." (Wikipedia)
When you call me a "sick in the head hater," you are demonstrating intolerance of another's political view. When you say, "they just want to tear something down, anything down," you are, again, demonstrating intolerance of another group's political view. You are good. We are bad, and we thereby justify our contempt for you. That is the basis of fascism.
(And just so you know... a large component of Obama's base is White men who were "trying to tear something down" in the 60s).
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. No, they were trying to build up |
|
I am not intolerant of anybody trying to build up, not even Hillary's supporters. But there are none of that type of person in this thread. This thread is full of haters who demonstrated INTOLERANCE OF ANOTHER'S POLITICAL VIEW and intimidated the OP into deleting a very beautiful post. It's disgusting and sick in the head.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |