Tropics_Dude83
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:29 PM
Original message |
Drudge and Hillary co-ordinate their efforts |
|
According to articles I've read over the past primary season, Drudge has several key leakers inside the HRC campaign. When they had a huge fundraising haul in early of 2007, HRC staffers leaked it to him first. When she had a bad debate with Tim Russert, Drudge was leaked a statement by HRC that Tim had been beyond unfair to her or something like that.
Drudge is just trying to save his ally Hillary's campaign. Let's all just ignore this emotional incident please. Not the least of the reasons is that it doesn't matter.
|
Tarc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That must be way Drudge's leading "Hillary tearing up in Connecticut" headlines are being repeated verbatim here by Team Obama?
|
Dogmudgeon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Thats very interesting |
|
Do you have any links for them?
I'd really love to take it to those cheaters and liers. I could pritn them out and make posters.
Hilary must be stopped -- at all costs!
--p!
|
bidenista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. lol. sure looks like a real shill for hill to me |
Blue_State_Elitist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Drudge is one of few willing to pick up the nastiness Clintons want out there against her opponents. |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 12:36 PM by AtomicKitten
Most actual news organizations aren't interested in the lame albeit insidious nastiness the Clintons are trying to inject in this primary, ergo the intermittent, casually-dropped snark bombs from Clinton surrogates polluting the election process.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |