Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Ask not what's good for the Nation, ask what's good for Us!" Michelle Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:40 PM
Original message
"Ask not what's good for the Nation, ask what's good for Us!" Michelle Obama
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 01:45 PM by MethuenProgressive
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/2/4/124123/6787

Michelle Obama: " I Would Have To Think About Supporting Clinton If She Is The Nominee"

This is what we do NOT need

Imagine if Bill Clinton had said that? Michelle Obama needs to straighten this out immediately. Really bad stuff from the Obama campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay. I've heard enough.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 01:43 PM by mcscajun
:eyes:

I've been on the fence for a while, and going back and forth all day. This tears it.

I'll vote for Hillary tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Try doing some research yourself instead of blindly believing this specific DUer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. i think he was being sarcastic,
at least i hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. I haven't "Blindly believed" any DUer. I have done my own research.
For a long time now I have watched, listened, and researched. I originally did not want to have to vote for either Clinton OR Obama. For the record, I've been waiting a long time to vote for a black President, a woman President. In this primary season, I had other choices than these two particular candidates in mind. I hoped it wouldn't come down to these two, but it did. I've been torn for days now over what to do.

Today, I saw the post on Mrs. Obama's statement, and I have already watched the entire video.

As I said, I've been on the fence for a while. I've made my decision, not based on a post, but on gut feeling backed up by all of the above.

I'm done. I will support whoever is our Democratic Nominee in November, but tomorrow, I vote for Hillary Clinton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. Good choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you swear that you don't support loyalty oaths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. You had no problem with all the reports of Clintons sabotaging Gore and Kerry campaigns
in 2000 and 2004. Did they do that for YOU? For our Dem party? For our Dem nominees? For our Dem voters?

TOTAL Hypocrisy. I have to think long and hard before I vote for Hillary Clinton if she's the nominee and I've been an active, committed Democrat for 10 years longer than Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. because
those reports are unfounded gossip.

This is video of Michelle Obama's own words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. The quoted title of the OP is in the video? I don't think so. Apparently you have no problem
with blatent mis-representation, MF.

Otherwise you would bring that up.

Michelle is asked if she would actively campaign for Clinton shoud she win the nomination, and she said she would have to think about it.

Will you hold house parties for Obama if he wins and give him money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Baloney. There's video of Bill on LKL defending Bush in 2004 from criticisms, and video
of Hillary joining Bush's smear against Kerry in 2006.


http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/19/clinton.iraq/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg



And Douglas Brinkley is a noted HISTORIAN, not a gossip. And Woodward's book was VETTED by lawyers and there is no denial ever issued by Carville.

http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354


http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward


If it was JUST gossip as YOU claim - then show me the statement Carville put out that makes the same claim YOU do. Surely his War Room would know that any lie or distortion of him would be answered before 24 hours, right?

Go snow the gullible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. the Woodward/Carville thing
is just the product of your fevered imagination.

There's no evidence, and nobody in a position to know, claims that Carville betrayed Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Woodward WITNESSED the entire scene himself, Carville doesn't deny it happened.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 02:32 PM by blm
YOU are the one trying to reduce this to something that never occurred at all, yet the provisional ballot numbers CLEARLY dropped to 150,000 after that phonecall to Blackwell made after Carville's phonecall to Matalin.

Your BS is intended to rope the gullible - I suggest you TRY your act in the Election Reform forum and see how many will buy what you're selling. They'll eat your diversionary tactics for breakfast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. We've been through this before
let's stipulate that Carville called Matalin.

That doesn't answer all the other questions - why was Carville told? He wasn't part of the campaign. Was Carville told to keep it confidential? IF it was confidential, who in the campaign violated that confidentiality by telling Carville? What's the difference between the Bush team finding out in the middle of the night vs. early the next morning? Is the ONLY explanation for the number of provisional ballots changing that they were stolen? Why has not a single person in the Kerry campaign faulted Carville for this so-called betrayal?

You've pieced together a whole narrative based on a few little facts - you're filling in all the blanks in a way to make it as bad as possible for Carville, but you have zero evidence of the facts you're filling in, and in fact, looking at it objectively shows that you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I believe Kerry HAS been letting them have it behind the scenes and not publicly
because he actually IS a concerned Democrat who puts party and his country before himself - always.

Something the effin Clintons and their fascist thugs NEVER do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Michelle, what happened to "unity "if Obama does not win?
Sounds like she is outta here. So much for unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. She said she'd have to think about CAMPAIGNING - you sure dismiss Clintons'
sabotage of voters and candidates in 2000 and 2004 while holding Michelle to the fire for a distortion.

Where is the sense of PROPORTION?

I'd have to think hard about voting for a closed government Democrat like the Clintons. Michelle says she'd have to think hard about CAMPAIGNING for Clinton - big effin deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. And if YOU believe Woodward is lying about Carville's actions that night - WRITE HIM
and demand a retraction.

You sure get upset whenever it gets posted here and so VIGILANTLY watch any thread that puts the article up. So - make it easier on yourself and call Woodward and his lawyers and demand a retraction.

Or why don't you sue Woodward for defaming Carville with mere 'gossip' as you want to play it out for the audience here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Can't you read?
I'm not disputing what Woodward wrote.

I'm disputing all the fill-in-the-gap facts that you INVENT to make a complete narrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. There are no fill-in gaps. You want to pretend the number of ballots didn't drop from 250,000
to 150,000 because of Bush's call to Blackwell after Matalin informed them of the details of Carville's call? Go ahead - that proves you are deliberately being obtuse because you NEED to protect TeamClinton.

What would YOU say - Carville called Matalin and gave details of the provisional ballots Kerry was going to challenge - Matalin says they must tell Bush to call Blackwell and then a call goes out to Blackwell and......in YOUR version, the ballot numbers dropped on their own with NO link whatsoever to WH or Carville's call to the WH about those same ballots.

You have got to be fucking KIDDING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. The reported number DID drop
but why is the only explanation that 100k ballots were stolen due to Carville's call?

It was election night - preliminary reports often don't match the final numbers. You take the early reports as gospel - and that's not reasonable.

Now...

Why was Carville told? What would have changed between 2:00am and 8:00am? Why has nobody from the Kerry campaign ever once come forward with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Because the call made from the WH after Carville's call was TO BLACKWELL.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 07:17 PM by blm
Kerry couldn't say a damn thing because at that point there would NEVER be any evidence.

I am quite sure the reason Kerry is working so hard for Obama is BECAUSE he's sick of the CROOKS from the Dem party fuck us all over year after year just to protect the secrecy and privilege od the elite as they seek to shore up their own power.

Fuckin' fascists wearing donkey masks - that's ALL they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Nobody in Kerry's campaign
has ever said that Carville sabotaged them. Not a one.

You don't find that odd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. How do you know? They KNOW they were backstabbed - Brinkley certainly says so.
And Kerry working his ass off for Obama speaks loudly to me.

The fascist wing of the party that Clintons have been leading for years can go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. One small statement by ANYONE
could destroy the traitor Carville, if what you say is true.

Yet he's still raking in the bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Protected by the Fascist wing of the party the Clintons lead. They'll get theirs.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 07:54 PM by blm
It may take a few gorounds, but they'll get theirs.

And if those fascist backstabbers speak for you, then ta....focking....ta. Apologists can burn with them since they certainly care little for this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. ok
here's where we end. When people pull the fascist bullshit, I back away slowly.

The last word is yours - knock yourself out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I wouldn't have to think long and hard about Obama.
And I know most of his policies are bullshit fodder for the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Talk about extreme overreaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm deeply disgusted by this. She's a bum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. She desperately wants to be Jackie Kennedy.
Not the *next* Jackie - but *Jackie*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I like Jackie better than Evita, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
67. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think I've heard something to the same effect out of Bill Clinton's mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Beg to differ.
Her comments in this interview go into the character attack zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. If you believe misrepresenting your political opponent will help your cause,
well, who i'm I to talk sense to you.

Michelle said she would vote for whoever gets the Dem nomination, but asked if she would actively campaign for Hill, she said she would have to think about it.

Would you actively campaign for Obama if he gets the nomination, MethusianP?

Go door to door for Obama? Put your face on campaign literature sent out in a mailing?

Fly around the country and make speeches?

Host house meetings for Obama?

Will Bill and Hill go on the stump for Obama if he wins? I haven't seen them commit to that, have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Duplicate post self delete
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 01:53 PM by John Q. Citizen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some dreams are more equal than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm certain that was not the brightest thing she ever said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. What if... it *was*??
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. heheh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. With the treatment that Hillary is getting on DU, it makes sense Michelle would say this
If Obama is the nominee, I'll be voting dem as a vote against the GOP, not an enthusiastic embrace of the Obama candidacy. But that's all Obama wants from me anyway - just my vote - and then to shut up and get out of they way of the Hope express, lest it run me over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Could you see yourself WORKING to support Hillary Clinton if she's the nominee?"
Stop spreading lies!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. The answer to that is not what she said. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Huh???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. And why was that question so hard to answer
as yes? Every Democrat works to get the Democratic nominee elected. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. TalkLeft lied. The video and transcript proves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I watched the video,
and MO said she'd have to think about working to support Clinton if she was the nominee. That is not an queston that any Democrat should answer any way but yes; that's not an answer that seeks to unite the party against the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. AGAIN-TalkLeft LIED. They misquoted her changing the whole meaning of what she DID say.
They said she said she would not support Hillary. That is NOT what she said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. AGAIN,
I listened to what she said myself, and she should have said she would work to support the Democratic nominee not matter what. She didn't, she quibbled, she hesitated, and she never answered yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. She did not say what TalkLeft SAID she said. They lied. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. this is so sad that she said this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. yes it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. To be fair, here is the whole video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7yaD9OXZ_o

She was asked if she would "work to support" which is different than would she support. That means actively campaigning, flying around the country holding rallies, giving speeches. She doesn't know if she would do that.

You conveniently omitted that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gee, it's almost like she said voting for Hillary would be a "roll of the dice."
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 02:05 PM by returnable
Who could ever say such a thing about a fellow Democrat? :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Grammer lesson 101 - use of " " means that someone said these exact words
not re-phasing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Spelling lesson 21-- it's grammar, not "grammer."
:rofl:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
65. In your stupid little moment of self congratulation that you can spell,
I'll just say that I can use a spell checker when I care, but there is no auto checker for using grammar to lie and mislead. There is no drop down menu that makes sure the shit you put inside " " was actually said by someone. So take your smug self and realize I was calling someone a liar, not making fun of their stupidity from 10th grade English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. Another moment of Hope and Togetherness brought to us by an
Obama groupie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. "not re-phasing"? What phase is not Michelle re-entering?
Is punctuation grammar? O! "Eats, shoots, and leaves!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csorman Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Wow, you guys are really, really stretching.
You constantly complain about how you're being smeared on DU, and then you go pull something like this. Her comment may not have been what she SHOULD have said, but you DID take it out of context, admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
44. Shame on you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. I agree. Shame on you, Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginantonic40 Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. What crap
You want to sway voters because the day before 20+ primaries because one of the candidates spouses answers a gotcha question by not enthuasiastically endorsing the other candidate! Have you people ever followed politics before this election? From what I've read today doesn't sound like it. It sounds more like a bunch of teenagers arguing about the studend body elections. This is a serious election and I'm seeing alot of unserious people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
53. Did you see her help Stevie Wonder up the steps yesterday?
He FELL. I am a caregiver for someone who is legally blind.
There are times in life when you have to put someone elses safety above your own needs.

geesh:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
55. The more I hear from her, the less I like her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
57. This is very unfair to Michelle...
She has taken leave of her career, she tries to get home every few days so the lives of their daughters can be somewhat normal..and she is doing everything she can to support her husband. She is not a politician.

So damn right she has to think about what she'll do before she makes a committment to go off campaigning again if Barack doesn't get the nomination. She has a right to have time to think about things...

So don't be so damn cynical!!! Leave the lady alone!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Ahhhhhh poor, poor widdle Michell, poor baby
pull out another Victim card for Team BO.

I don't like "her tone." :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. It's politics baby....
If you say it...

You own it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #57
68. If Ms. Obama can't handle this, she can't handle the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC