MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:06 PM
Original message |
Though Polling is always suspect, can we trust numbers that Include Super Bowl Sunday? |
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Warning: stereotypes ahead! |
|
I'm guessing women are more likely to pick up the phone during the Superbowl. I would think this would skew results towards HRC a bit. It seems the polls are moving towards BO, in the last day or two, however.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Many women also watch the Super bowl. I did, my husband did not. |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. But it is true that football is aimed at men. |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. The Puppy Bowl was on at the same time. |
|
just putting it out there.
|
NoBorders
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Or they left the house |
|
while hubby stayed home with pals to watch. But frankly, at least at the party I was at, there were just as many women, though they weren't really watching the game.
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. That's why I put the warning. ;-) |
|
In fact, I know many women who love football, while I am a guy who didn't even bother watching the Superbowl (And I am a former New Englander who lives in New York).
But the ads you see during football are definitely skewed towards men, which makes me think it has a larger male audience. If there is one thing advertisers pay attention to it's viewing demographics.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I thionk that is a fair question,,,,but one would suspect |
|
that the sample wou;d favor Hillary. Ig the guys were watching the game and youn adults we watching at some watering hole.
I dunno
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If they called before the game started, why not? |
|
It didn't start until after six PM on the East Coast. If they did mid-morning-early afternoon calls, I imagine they got some decent data. Not everyone has beer for breakfast on Super Bowl Sunday....
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. But not all calls happen happen mid morning. The Super bowl started at 3PM on the West Coast |
|
I think that would raise questions about those sampled in places like California.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Well, what if they called at one PM in California? nt |
rufus dog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think it would miss the younger voters |
|
More likely to be at a party than watching at home with family. We had basically an equal number of males and females at the party. Like a previous poster much less attention was paid by females.
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-04-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Another question about this: |
|
I'm guessing a significant number of respondents were, let's just say, "feeling groovy". Do you think a few beers and a couple pounds of nachos could change the way people respond?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |