Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If McCain the R nominee, then Clark should be on the Democratic ticket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:17 PM
Original message
If McCain the R nominee, then Clark should be on the Democratic ticket
If McCain is the Republican nominee, I think Wesley Clark should be on the ticket regardless of who is the Democratic nominee.

Clark's outstanding military credentials will help reassure the American people that the Democratic vision for security and ending the Iraq war is sound. Furthermore, he helps hedge against the manipulative effects of a possible terrorist attack in America during the election.
He would be an excellent advisor on security, defense and international affairs to the future President. He is close to Clinton, which bodes well for a future relationship. However, he is not a divisive figure on the campaign path and his straightforward, intelligent, friendly demeanor should be very compatible with Obama.

I believe that his sense of service to the country would assure that Clark accept either candidate's request to be VP.

Finally, Clark is progressive, who has been very helpful in getting Democrats elected, and should help unify the party after this very contentious primary season is over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clark is a great man.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 03:23 PM by lvx35
Against the war, incredibly strait forward and clear-thinking in his Resistance to Bush. He would be great on any ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can get behind that.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wesley Clark endorsed Clinton...I'm sure he is on her short list for running mate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. No. Wesley Clark is no politician.
He will never be on the national ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll support that ticket all the way to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bad idea...
McCain is the one that is going to get it from the crazies this go 'round.... i.e. Vietnam Vets Against John McCain.. lets not remove the attention from him and have the liars put it on us.

I love to see repubs eat their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Attacks will come regardless of background
You post that McCain will be attacked by the "crazies," and imply that any military man/war hero type would be. Given the history of recent elections, it is clear that anyone of any background will be attacked. Given that Clark now has quite a bit of experience with fending off political attacks, and that he comes across as honest and non-political which helps in this regard, I think his presence of the ticket would only be beneficial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm a hardcore Clarkie, but tactically speaking, Jim Webb would be better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Webb would be a good choice too
I agree that Webb would be a good tactical choice too. My only problem is that his Senate seat is in Virginia, which makes it vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC