Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby Poll: "Obama leapfrogged over Clinton in Missouri"

[usregimechange]

Obama leapfrogged over Clinton in Missouri, gaining four points while she dropped two points to end the tracking period with 47% support to her 42%. Clinton continued to lead among white voters with 48% of their support to Obama’s 40%, while Obama had a four-to-one margin over Clinton with African American voters, with 72% of their support to her 18% support. The survey included 851 likely voters and carried a margin of error of +/-3/4 points.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1445

[Alexander]

1. A DUer said that Missouri will help determine tomorrow's winner.

I think that's accurate. :-)

[NJSecularist]

2. Who the fuck knows what to believe?

These polls are driving me crazy!

Each and every one tells us a different story.

:banghead: :banghead:

[mckeown1128]

5. I know....I know...

I am just curious. Since you are from NJ... how do you think NJ will turn out?

[NJSecularist]

7. I think the state will go to Hillary

but it will be close, around a 5% difference.

[Barack_America]

8. I would agree. But I'm going to be canvassing my ass off...

...to try to turn it otherwise. IMO, it really depends on how many of those unaffiliateds come out to vote. That is the big question mark.

[Barack_America]

6. Don't give them much weight, individually.

Look at the trends.

If you look at them individually, the sampling weighs heavily...what percentage youth, women, etc. If you look at the trend among multiple pulls, that stuff cancels each other out. The one that stands out to me today as being a POS is the California SUSA poll. That's going in a completely different direction than the others.

The trend overall shows amazing momentum for Obama.

Will it be enough? Well, that depends on how many youth, women, etc. actually come out to vote.

[Barack_America]

3. I don't see that poll at the link. *edit* Nevermind. I found it.

:shrug:

[usregimechange]

4. Scroll down to "Missouri - Democrats"