What, no attack threads about Hillary "garnishing" wages today?

[DainBramaged]

Didi I miss today's hit topic? Like, what did the Obamabots target today?

I noticed Paul Krugman in the vaunted NY Times thinks her plan is significantly better than Obama's.


the difference between the plans could well be the difference between achieving universal health coverage — a key progressive goal — and falling far short.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/opinion/04krugman.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

[msongs]

1. an obamanista did it a few minutes ago and kicked his own thread in less than 2 minutes :-) nt

[ErnestoG]

2. Do you want one? I will if you do.

[DainBramaged]

6. No, I actually expect better of you.

we could talk about pancake recipies, YUM.

[ErnestoG]

16. Seriously, I'd be happy to oblige.

[DainBramaged]

23. That's ok, make pancakes, not spam

[ErnestoG]

24. No, I think I will....stand by...

[DainBramaged]

26. I'll click the red x if you do!

[Jed Dilligan]

3. I'm actually missing yesterday's more substantial fare. nt

Edit: You know what? Thanks for the idea.

[MonkeyFunk]

4. That was yesterday

today is how she breaks down and sobs when a nail breaks.

Try to keep up.

[DainBramaged]

12. I had to work today, sorry, I'll do my best to make up ground

:hi:

[Bucky]

5. Maybe because the people engaging in the bickering here don't understand issues

...which is not to say they don't have issues, but probably folks turned on by ad hominem attacks are not so inclined to look at substantive political issues when they post here.

You didn't think this was about actual politics, did you?

[radfringe]

7. there were a couple

but they drifted off the front screen, and were replaced by Hillary crying, Obama coughing, Hillary coughing, and Obama smoking

so the score is
1 crying
2 coughing
1 smoking

these are very important things to consider when voting for a presidential candidate.

However, I'm waiting for the burping and farting results to come in before I make a decision.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

8. Booo!

[Yossariant]

9. This morning, they had a topic: "Krugman says Obama plan is FAR superior to Hillary's"

:rofl:

[DainBramaged]

10. ROFLOL PISS PANTS

I think they get together and chat on IRC or AOL and decide who is going to do what threads and for how long they will hit the thread until it's the next one's turn. I swear, it is relentless, and I just don't see it being done to Obama,

WHICH MAKES ME THINK THERE ARE OTHER FORCES INVOLVED!!!!!!

[Yossariant]

14. Absolutely! Saturday, they had a few topics touting Andrew Sullivan's endorsement of Obama!

:rofl:

[BootinUp]

11. I think we wore them down a little yesterday and this morning. nt

[Barack_America]

13. Nope. The MSM is pretty much running with this one.

We can just sit back and watch now.

[Levgreee]

15. Should we spam the same topic for two days like for handshakegate? nt

[Alexander]

18. Apparently that's the Shillbot standard.

It just isn't an issue until you've spammed DU for days about it.

[DainBramaged]

22. Oh, you mean like yesterday with 20 threads about her garnishing wages, and now we know it's crap

Planned attacks, it is really getting transparent what the Obamabots are doing here. And I am

POSITIVE

many aren't for Obama at all.

[MoonRiver]

17. No, because you see, fantasies of crying trump fantasies of garnishing.

It's an Obamatron thing. You wouldn't understand. :shrug:

[DainBramaged]

19. What the fudge is this crying bullshit, women cry, men cry , kids cry, no big deal?

I know for a fact that if ET could have cried he would have.

Jesus, it's better than Gramps McCain drooling isn't it?

[MoonRiver]

21. And on top of that she didn't even cry!

But don't ever try to let the facts interfere with an Obamaniac's spin.

[Occam Bandage]

20. Yeah, yesterday we were actually talking about the issues, and today we're back to shit.

So, er, woo us.

[LittleClarkie]

25. Are you rubbing your hands together in glee?

Can't wait for them to say something so you invent strife yourself?

As if we didn't have enough of it here?

"Oh, I bet the Obamabots are going to say something about THIS! And if they don't, I'll just say if for them to save time."

Uh huh.

[DainBramaged]

27. YOU folks reached new lows yesterday, new lows

so don't preach to my wrinkled old ass.

[LittleClarkie]

28. It's happening on both sides

.

[DainBramaged]

29. Nah, I spend far less time chastising Clintonistas than Obamabots

Wait on edit, a picture I love

[LittleClarkie]

32. Obama's a muslim and wants to talk to terrorists!!

Maybe you need to chastise both sides more equally.

[DainBramaged]

33. I caught our receptionist at work passing that email around

first I had her Internet access cut off (I am the SYSADMIN), then she lost her computer access last week when she complained she couldn't get her email and pay her bills(to one of the owners). They are NOT sympathetic to computer abuse during work hours.

She was written up and given a warning for using the company computers for personal business.

So in spite of what you may think, I practice in my daily life what I preach here.

[Occam Bandage]

34. The problem is more that you don't preach here what you claim you do.

[LittleClarkie]

35. Cool

Much obliged.

[Occam Bandage]

30. Reach new lows? We were talking about what she was literally, actually proposing.

Since when is that "new lows?"

[DainBramaged]

31. I see ignored people

Oh my :nuke: