Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Potential Trouble For Obama In New York

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:19 PM
Original message
Potential Trouble For Obama In New York
I don't know if anyone else has mentioned this today, so forgive me if I'm just repeating something. But I just came from voting and I was surprise that when I went to the voting booth, Clinton's name was the first one on the ballot and there were no other names next to hers?

I mean, there were names, but none you could vote for.

It went:

Clinton
Kucinich
Richardson
Biden
Dodd
Obama

and then way down at the bottom was Obama.

I don't know if that's going to mess up his vote or not, but I had to actually search for him before I found his name and the row I could flip the little switches for him.

It's probably more an annoyance than anything else. But I wonder why Clinton was the first name on the ballot, even before Biden. Why didn't they just move Obama and Clintons' names and spots together to make it easier for people?

Just something to keep in mind for the results later on tonight. Anyone else in NY notice the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:21 PM
Original message
'there were no other names next to hers' - what do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. they were arranged across the top space of the rows
with their pledged delegates beneath them. Or at least they were in my District here in Manhattan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. At my polling place we have the lever machines. They look like this today:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. More foul play from the Hillary camp
Is anybody really surprised? :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ah, so she is fixing the election? Good, she can fix the general too then.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yup, cause the HRC campaign really designs ballots and the machines
Oh boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yup, cause the HRC campaign really designs ballots and the machines
Oh boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Dumbest. Post. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. And that's hard to do around here!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. You can't really believe
Clinton dictates the ballot order on the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. And just like clockwork
the whining begins about being cheated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. oh jays'us h christ........get a friggen grip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Yeah, that diabolical woman designed the machines. 50 years ago.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. 50? Some of them go back to the early 1900s
That Hillary is sure a busy woman, what with rigging all the elections and selling us out to the Republicans it's a wonder she finds time for eating babies. Maybe I should have voted for her - sounds like she gets things done! /feeble_attempt_at_humor

Seriously, the order of names is probably random. There have been studies that indicate whoever's in the first slot gets ~2% more votes just from position. In my state, the names are in different order in each district to try and prevent someone from getting this kind of bump statewide.

BTW, Clinton was last on my ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. the names get rotated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. the names get rotated
it was worth repeating just as you typed it.

k.i.s.s.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. As an Obama supporter, I believe we are intelligent enough and have the attention span
to read through the list of SIX CHOICES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. You're wrong when you are talking about mechanical lever machines
The point was that Clinton's name was alone and it was clear which lever to pull. The other names, however, were apparently hard to align with the proper lever. (See my post about my son's complaint, below--he had a lot of trouble and he is quite intelligent and patient).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. I should join MENSA, 'cause it only took me a second to find him and vote!
FINALLLLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. You have Obama listed twice
That can't be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. No he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. Yes, he does, and he doesn't have Edwards
See:


"Clinton
Kucinich
Richardson
Biden
Dodd
Obama

and then way down at the bottom was Obama"


I think the first Obama must have been meant to be Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. In CT where I voted
Obama had the top spot (and it had lots of the candidates that have dropped out of the race). Hillary is in the middle. All and all it was pretty easy to find who you were looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Hillary is in the middle." - that is the one location that screws Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. How was turnout in NY? Im trying to figure out how turnout is in the City with the Giants parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. I imagine they randomized the names and Hillary's came out on top.
That's what they did here in Arizona. Some guy named "Sandy Whitehouse" was at the top of the ballot here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. What Ever Happened to Alphabetical Order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. John Adams won too often, now they rotate names or have a draw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Yeah, NY got sick of Governor Aaron Aardvark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. being on top of the ballot is worth approx. 3 points. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. From what? People too stupid to read the second choice?
Top of the ballot is worth 3-5 points for a down ballot position. I'm pretty sure that for president people know who they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't know about NY, but in many states candidates are listed randomly.
And it could vary from county to county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Each county in Texas has a "draw" for ballot order ...
since each county is responsible for it's own ballot creating.

That is, someone (a candidate's volunteer or an election person if no volunteer shows up) draws numbers from a 'hat' to determine ballot order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I noticed the same thing.
I found him, but it took a second. I'm assuming people know who they want to vote for. I doubt that they understand the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bottom is second best to top - any other position would hurt him - at least that is what
they said about positioning way back in my youth.

Bottom or top is a 2 to 3% gain compared to middle - with top getting a very slight edge

Most states rotate by precinct because of this - I thought NY rotated - but in this case it would make more sense to not rotate given only 2 contenders.

A NY election law person is needed to get you a real answer (my reply about past memories of the rules is worth little).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. My son called to report the same thing
It was his first time voting in New York (he moved there this fall for graduate school). Here was his experience:

His polling place was listed in an adjacent apartment building. He went to the front lobby, but could find no signs nor anyone there. He decided to go to the rear of the building and, indeed, found a sign ... but he couldn't open the door! Finally, as one last try, he decided to return to his own building, go down to the laundry room, and enter the other building from there: he finally found the polling place!

He was a little shocked at having to vote on an old lever machine. He said that he considers himself fairly capable (he was a National Merit Scholar, graduated with honors in math and physics, and is a theoretical mathematics student) ... but he found it confusing! It was hard to tell if he was pushing the right levers he said ... except that Clinton's lever was standing all alone on the left (I think). So your story is confirmed ... he had to triple check to figure out if he had punched a lever for Obama (it was unclear, he said, as to whether it might be Edwards's).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, with HC's supernatural ability to fix elections, defeating McCain will be a piece of cake.
Jesus Christ. :eyes:

For the record, if O. wins it will be because he won and not because he did anything illegal or unethical. So I just want to be clear in advance that I will not be looking for excuses if my candidate loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. obama last choice in california as well
bleh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oh no, that's big potential trouble.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. lol, yah BIG HUGH!!

not sure how im suppose to be happy about it though lol id rather it were on top :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. Obama was fourth down on our booths today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. There's only two viable people running. Clinton was first and Obama was last. (alphabetical order)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. I don't believe it's the same on every machine.
I think they mix it up in different precincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. I voted in CT and accordiing to the news here
the names were sorted randomly to come up with the order. It so happens that here Obama's name is first and Hillary's is near the bottom. (I think she was next to last). I thought this was how it was done in most places. I don't see anything diabolical or evil. I voted for Hillary. I looked for her name and marked it accordingly. My eyesight isn't all that great but I would have trouble mixing up "Barrack Obama" with "Hillary Clinton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. When I went to vote on my paper ballot today in California
Hillary Clinton's name was SECOND TO LAST!! I'm really pissed--did Maria Shriver use her First Lady clout to magically move Obama's name above Hillary's?? Oh, the humanity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. There weren't the delegates
names next to the candidate to vote for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. Obama got top billing in Illinois
but then again, Hillary was second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC