usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:44 PM
Original message |
Missouri: 0% reporting from St. Louis City, 2% from St. Louis Co |
|
Not over, not even close. Trust me I told you the same thing when Talent was beating McCaskill's ass before those co came in.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:45 PM
Original message |
Obama's polling well in St. Louis. |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Obama's polling well in St. Louis. |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I agree. I think it will tighten significantly once STL comes in.... |
|
(I remember the feeling when McCaskill pulled ahead in '06!)
But I think Hillary will hold on and win MO - which will give her big MO
|
IndyOp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Has anyone called Missouri yet? Without the StL results? Based on polls? |
|
I was born in StL and grew up in StL County. As a Democrat raised in a Republican household I learned early to hold out until the StL results were in before imagining that we knew the MO results.
:hi:
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I remember following the 2006 race. Those two were really late coming in... |
|
and propelled Claire McCaskill to her win over slimeball Jim Talent. She had been down virtually all night.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
5. In Missouri, the rural ares get counted first........ |
|
Kansas City and St. Louis get counted last. The numbers from the cities should start rolling in about 9pm and the vote totals could change drastically depending on which candidate wins the urban voters!
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Hillary may do decent in Jackson co but I predict st louis city to go heavy for Obama |
thatsrightimirish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Be careful about 2006 comparisons |
|
That was a Republican vs a Democrat so of course St. Louis was going to go Democratic. But this is Democrat vs Democrat so I don't think its going to overwhelmingly change anything. But if it does, it does. Thats's what's fun about elections.
|
FlyingSquirrel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Squirrel Prediction (Bellweather state): Clinton 48%, Obama 47% |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think he will come up a tad short too but it will close fast and depends on turnout |
jasmine621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I am really surprised that Hillary is even in this race. nt |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. HA ~ALL FIRED-UP FOR THE LADY~~ |
milkyway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-05-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes, 3% of StL in, Obama up 55-37. NY Times has a great chart with info per county. |
|
http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/MO.htmlNumbers look very good for Obama for what's to come in StL and KC. It will end up extremely close.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 02:51 AM
Response to Original message |