Edwards at 99% in Utah?

[jackson_dem]

1% in. Edwards 603, Hillary 4, Obama 0.

http://www.politico.com/

[Cleita]

1. If that trend holds, that will really be something especially

in Utah. However, among the liberals in Utah, it might be true.

[avaistheone1]

2. W-h-o-a!

Interesting, I wonder if it is because the familes in Utah could relate more to John Edwards' platform? Given many of the folks there tend to have large families, I imagine alot of the economic issues John talked about must have rang painfully true for them.

[underpants]

3. with 0% in CNN had no problem calling it for Romney

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4420191&mesg_id=4420191

[southern_belle]

4. You saw it too?

I saw it on MSNBC where Keith called it for Obama, and then the ticker rolled over showing Edwards 39% and then Clinton 0, with 0 precincts in. After that they quit showing Utah (as did CNN). Then you look at the actual numbers from the CNN web site - the numbers are halfway in for the Rethugs, and there is 0 for the Dems. If you go by county, some of the numbers are starting to come in.

I know, I know, I'll put on my hat :tinfoilhat: :(

[DaLittle Kitty]

5. I Saw The Same Shit! Funny But The Totals For The "Historic Candidates" Do NOT Equal 100%?

Thye Other Percent IS Our Guy Johnny... But The FASCIST Media WILL NOT ALLOW HIS IMAGE TO BE SEEN!!!!!!!!