According to CNN, Senator Clinton is leading in Utah

[russian33]

44% Clinton - 41% Obama...with 2% reporting

why do i keep hearing that UT was called for Sen.Obama?

[russian33]

1. sorry, here's the link

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/dates/index.html#20080205

[WilyWondr]

4. I think it is because

only 43 votes separate them and only 2% of the precincts have reported.

They have exit polling of 410 people that shows Obama got 70% of that exit polling.

[russian33]

10. oh, ok...i see what you're saying

thanks :)

[goldcanyonaz]

2. I don't understand Utah results.

[MADem]

3. Reuters and MSNBC I thought called it for Obama--maybe too soon?

Or maybe it's close as hell, like CT.

[HughMoran]

5. Alread called for Obama

I think...

[goldcanyonaz]

7. Interesting because she's leading.

:shrug:

[slick8790]

6. I think CNN.com has been having problems with the Utah totals.

For a while, I think they had Edwards in the lead with 99% of the vote. A little out of whack.

[russian33]

9. here's what Politco has, and they called it for Obama

Clinton 43.48% 927 votes
Obama 42.17% 932 votes
Edwards 14.93% 330 votes

and with that, they have called it for Obama...i'm confused as to why....maybe i'm missing something

[Arugula Latte]

11. Maybe Salt Lake City is out?

:shrug:

[sandnsea]

8. Exit Polls

And reports from the precincts where counting has started.