jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:08 AM
Original message |
Lunch pail Democrats for Hillary in CA, Obama wins the affluent |
|
Under 15k: H 54, O 43 15-30K: H 56, O 39 30-50K: H 58, O 36 50-75K: H 47, O 45 75-100K: H 48, O 48 100-150K: O 55, H 42 150-200K: O 53, H 46 200K or more: O 54, H 44
Begala is coincidentally talking about the class gap right now on CNN.
|
buff2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They know he is not really for the poor |
|
Another corporate owned candidate. Just what we need. :puke:
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
2. But... but.... she is DLC!! He is the PEOPLE!! |
|
Rich people.
Who can afford to play games and lose.
|
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. "Who can afford to play games and lose" |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
and the people who have the time to pay attention to politics know the difference. This is just sad sad sad for working people and they don't even know it.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. So is Obama as tonight's results confirm |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Oh please. How classist. |
|
I'm working/lower middle class, and I pay PLENTY of attention, and that's how I know that Obama is the wrong candidate.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
China trade, India trade, insourcing, Khazikstan, you bet, that's all good for working people. Give me a break.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Obama has the same policy as Hillary on trade |
|
People of all income levels who follow politics know this. If folks wanted to vote on trade they no longer have a choice among Democrats with Edwards gone.
The fact is the Clinton years were very good for working folks and they remember that.
|
kerrygoddess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Clinton Breaks With Husband's Legacy on Nafta Pact, China Trade |
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Ah, those stupid, ignorant poor |
|
Not voting for the flavor of the moment, eh?
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
YOU said they were stupid and ignorant.
|
Hoof Hearted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. That is fuckin' condescending. You might want to rethink that. Cool off a little, and rethink. |
|
You don't think people who work for a living in California have the capacity to make an informed choice? They didn't pick the candidate you wanted, but that is NO REASON to patronize them or dismiss their abilities and insult their integrity.
|
Jed Dilligan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Watching results at the bar with two SEIU organizers |
calmblueocean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Obama MO win was made up of majority older voters |
|
At least according to CNN exit polls.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message |