Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"OBAMA UP 13 IN CALIFORNIA" This is HUGGGHHH!!!1111!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:24 AM
Original message
"OBAMA UP 13 IN CALIFORNIA" This is HUGGGHHH!!!1111!
Well, at least that is what Zogby told us in it's final poll before the primary in California.

http://swarheit.blogspot.com/2008/02/final-zogby-poll-obama-up-13-in.html

So much for these polls being right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Zogby: Clinton in Free Fall in California.
OOPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. lol, I hope Obama fans didn't believe that
Zogby is shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Besides... as rapidly as the situation is changing ...
... with Obama's momentum being only recent, and Edwards leaving the race... the polled opinions are likely not locked-in -- just like in New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lol polls are often wrong
But as has been said time and time again: trends matter.

We'll see how the state turns out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. and what is "often right"? Votes counted in complete secrecy on e-voting machines?
I'm not necessarily prejudging the issue EXCEPT to say that there's no basis for a presumptive validity in the election results when THOSE results were determined in secrecy, with no witnesses, not even election officials have any personal knowledge that the counts popping out of the magic black boxes are true and correct, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. When do we arrest these 2008 presidential candidates, past and
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 01:56 AM by kster
present for misleading us into a fake election. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama wins delegate contest.
That is really hugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. I guess I'm not too surprised by the CA results so far....I didn't see the polls!
The polls no longer work with the wide use of cell phones these days. They just aren't as useful as they used to be.

But I went into tonight thinking that if Obama got 40% in CA, he'd be doing great, to get some of those delegates. But I never expected he'd win CA, what with the large hispanic population and all. But then I have been too busy at work to check the polls lately.

I thought Obama was doing great until I read some posts here. It's all about expectations, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Last poll I take seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hmm, And Suddenly When Polls Don't Match Results
DUers think polls have always been wrong. I remember when polls were quite accurate and we were very suspicious when the results didn't match them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. LMAOROTF -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. If this is the best spin you can manage, you're REALLY in trouble. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bye Bye
ignore feature is back so you go on the list. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrymores Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the second-and-only "Make-or-Break"...
...state that would have decided Hillary's viability as a Democratic candidate (NH being the other), and the second-and-only state contest in which she utterly bucked poll expectations, reflected immediately before ballots were cast, to the tune of 13-15%, and managed to flip polls exactly on their own heads.

More than 5 million people have requested mail-in ballots in California, where there are 15.7 million registered voters. Election officials in the most populated and delegate-rich state in the country have said results may not be available until Wednesday or later.

In California, the secretary of state's office reported dozens of calls from nonpartisan voters complaining that poll workers had mistakenly tried to stop them from voting in the Democratic presidential primary.

According to California state party rules, voters who are unaffiliated with any political party may specially request ballots for the Democratic or American Independent primaries. Only Republican voters can vote in that party's primary.

Another problem is the state's recent switch from electronic voting machines to paper ballots. Four of California's most populous counties — Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Santa Clara — must count votes at centralized locations because there are not enough optical scanners for every precinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC