Keith Hints At Missouri Recount

[andyrowe]

I'll bet she knows better than to try it.

[gateley]

1. Why is he suggesting there might be? nt

[tammywammy]

2. All he said was that someone could ask for one

And then he said that this information wasn't provided by either campaign. There won't be a recount.

[andyrowe]

4. He read MO statute that indicates results within 1%

gives the runner-up the right to a state funded recount. He's just trying to stir the pot.

[gateley]

9. Thanks. nt

[NastyRiffraff]

3. No he didn't

He just pointed out that according to MO statute, the "loser" has a right to a recount if the win was less than 1%. He also said that was coming from neither of the campaigns.

This isn't winner take all, so it would be dumb to call for a recount.

[rodeodance]

5. Hill would not do that.

[George_Bonanza]

6. Who really cares who "wins" Missouri?

Delegates will be split either way. Hillary shouldn't try to look like a sore loser.

[tammywammy]

11. It wasn't implied or said that she'd ask for one

And she wouldn't, it would be stupid.

[LaPera]

7. With just over a 5k difference with over a million votes casted?

[BadgerLaw2010]

8. Doesn't matter for delegates. Might be mandated by law, though.

IIRC this was raised as a possibility in 2006 in the Senate race.

[Renew Deal]

10. They should recount it.

Every election should be.