Skwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:20 AM
Original message |
If the media is so anti-Clinton, why no mention of the EARLY voters in CA |
|
and how they impact the final vote percentages?
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
1. because it's irrelevant? or there is no cause/effect relationship here? nt |
Skwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
2. How did the early voters impact CA? |
|
Has there been analysis anywhere of this? I was wondering about it this morning.
|
Skwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. It was reported that the early voters were breaking HEAVILY for Clinton. |
|
I believe I heard 24% mentioned and that they comprised 40% of the early vote. Thus, Obama would have had to have made up SIGNIFICANT ground in order to close that gap. I'm waiting for the final percentages to make a calculation. Plus, there are all of those Obama votes thrown out in Los Angelos due to a technicality (which is really ridiculous).
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Late voters split in her favor too. Check out the exit polls. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |