Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama not only won the delegate count, he won 13 (maybe 14) states! Why is this not a big deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:55 PM
Original message
Obama not only won the delegate count, he won 13 (maybe 14) states! Why is this not a big deal?
BEFORE yesterday, he was ahead in only TWO of the 22 states and he ended up winning 13 and is leading in the 14th! And the media was saying he's going for delegates, so even if he loses 20 states, he COULD remain competitive. He exceeded expectations yet it's being portrayed as "expected results."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton News Network
still has its bets on her.
Her supporters refuse to accept those facts.
MSM pretty much sucks these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's why I didn't watch coverage of last night on CNN at all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Clinton News Network? ANOTHER RW creation. What a shock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
60. Oh Yeah....James Carville....Robert Zimmerman...
You can't watch CNN without these shameless Hillary campaigners inserting themselves into the analysis as "Democratic Party Strategists" or "Democratic Party Spokesmen".

They are NOT "Democratic Party Spokesmen"....They ARE "Hillary Campaign Spokesmen".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Every primary is spun in Clinton's favor.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 03:33 PM by Radical Activist
The near losses for Hillary are a big deal when Obama was far down in the polls a few weeks before. All this victimization talk about the media being against Hillary is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. I agree.
It's obvious no matter WHICH channel you watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. because the bullies from the other side said so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. New York and California. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You mean her home state and a state she was up in the polls by over 20% nearly the whole time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. And New Jersey
which MSNBC glossed over along with any other clinton win last night. It was particularly telling that at the beginning of the night (when they thought Zogby was g-d) that CA was going to determine the nomination. That fell by the wayside when it was clear Clinton had indeed won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. I agree - MSNBC never mention Hillary won nat'l popular vote by 200,000 or that O'sDelaware win was
solely because blacks voted 90% for Obama after he conned them by claiming the Clintons had changed from the first black presidential couple into folks that disrespect MLK and/or are insensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. Sad, but true I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
66. You are incorrect, it fell to the wayside because the rest of the states counteracted CA
If both candidates do okay or well in the other states, then California is the clincher and determines the winner. HOWEVER, as is evident, Obama had a large amount of states with a strong delegate advantage, giving him the LEAD, even though he lost california.

They didn't drop that meme because Hillary won CA, they dropped it because they were totally off in claiming that CA determined who won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. NY and CA are Dem givens. We need the states Obama won nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. because several of his wining states only had a few thousand votes total that he won with
the population of just NYCity alone is equal to the 13 of those states combined population....states wins carry little weight in the grand picture.....states don't vote PEOPLE do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Please. He was expected to LOSE all of those states. He won many of them.
Hillary's a NY Senator and Bill has an office in Harlem!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. again...."states DON"T vote PEOPLE do"
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 03:08 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. AGAIN-He won all the states he was expected to lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. People don't vote for President.
The Supreme Court does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
62. People don't vote for President.
The Supreme Court does (as of 2000)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
63. People don't vote for President.
The Supreme Court does (as of 2000)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. I'd think in a GE, Obama takes CA, NY w/o a problem.
The states he took last night is what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is a big deal.
Who is saying it's not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The media. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Well duh. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. That's the whole point of this thread.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Sorry, I just assumed that was assumed
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 03:47 PM by tridim
The MSM has never reported honestly about non-corporate candidates.

Edit: Progressive radio is reporting that it's a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Nope, I didn't assume that...
but you're right and I'm glad to hear that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Who won the victory speech slot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I have no idea what the "victory speech slot" is, but Obama gave the best victory speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because he didn't win the two states that coastal snobs...
...have deemed to be the only important states in this country.

Personally, Obama's victories in Midwestern swing states are far more impressive to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yes, but she was EXPECTED to win them...
And I agree that Obamas's victories were much more impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. My belief is that New York and California don't mean shit.
They'll go blue in the general election anyway.

The states that Obama (handily) won, however, they are vital in the General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I agree. But my point is the MSM isn't playing it that way.
You're right, though. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Of course they're not. They're in New York and California.
And we all know how important they are... :eyes:

I now understand what Edwards supporters felt like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. True...
Yeah, I know what you mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Agreed
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dont worry.... the narrative is turning Obama's way....
...the intrade and rasmussen markets showed 10% movement toward Obama in the past 48 hours.... the conventional wisdom, which is drawn from the popular viewpoint, which is reflected in these markets shows that Obama is moving up.


intrade.com

rasmussen.com


Forget the spin.... when people are forced to put their money where their mouth is, they are deciding that Obama's in a better place than Clinton right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. I know-I started a thread about them now being EQUAL on Intrade...
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 03:06 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. It is a big deal.
Congrats to Obama. Might want to turn off the TV. Obama did well. So did Clinton. This is going to be a long fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Thank you.
Good advice, but I won't follow it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because we only care about the states that Dukakis won.
Who cares about the others? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. umm because maybe ...states don't vote people do...and just NYC's Pop. alone equals 13 states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Um, what is this-the third time you've said this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. New york New York so nice I say it twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. He was expected to win closer to 14 states, so this was not a surprise
These were the odds the day before the primary.

California was trending toward Obama, so that ended up being kind of a disappointment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Expected as of when?
You are saying that his overcoming double-digit deficits in a matter of weeks to win 12 states is a disappointment?

Shit, I'd hate to find out what actually impresses you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Let's face it, Obama is doomed
He has more money, won more delegates, took more states, and we are about to have contests in states that are supposedly favorable to him. He's finished. It's over.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. Thanks for that...
and when he wins the caucuses this Saturday, let's see how they spin THAT. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. This is my favorit post of the day, thank you :-) (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
67. Mine too! Ditto. And thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
49. purr-fect
for those cat lovers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
64. Ha, no shit huh? It's Clinton-Bizarro-World out there right now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama fatigue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
59. Clinton Loans Campaign $5 Million Of Own Money
Looks more like Hillary fatigue to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. It's a big deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. In a GE, Obama takes CA, NY hands down.
The midwestern and southern states is what Dems need in the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. I agree...
and he, unlike Hillary, has support in those red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. Link Please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. To what? Haven't you watched the news at ALL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Here's a very pro-Hillary article which at least shows my stats to be true:
"He picked up 13 states to Clinton's eight, and he won more pledged delegates."

http://www.slate.com/id/2183819/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Of course I've been watching and reading. However,
She is ahead in the delegate count not Obama. Yes he won more states. New Mexico looks like it may go to her. Try this link:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Obama now has 838 delegates to Hillary's 836. Superdelegates don't count.
They can change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Can you please just give me a link to the actual poll that shows
the numbers you are saying. The poll I showed you does not compute that way. I heard just the opposite of what you say about Obama winning more delegates. I am not being snarky, I just would like to see the actual poll you are quoting from. I believe he won more states but she won more delegates. I may be wrong but would like to see what you are saying for myself. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Here ya go. Sorry, I was wrong. He's ahead by more than I thought:
"With the delegate count still under way, NBC News said Obama appears to have won around 840 delegates in yesterday’s contests, while Clinton earned about 830 — “give or take a few,” Tim Russert, the network’s Washington bureau chief, said on the “Today” show."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8358.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
51. I find the refusal by many
to understand that delegates win primary elections very depressing. And the non-stop degradation of a candidate and any public figure that throws there support behind that candidate, is also very troublesome. And these people are Democrats? They talk trash with no respect for anyone but themselves. That is all they add to a conversation...trash. Ugly, Ignorant, arrogant, condescending, bigoted human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. So do I.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC