BluegrassDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:46 PM
Original message |
Donna Brazile threatening to quit the Democratic Party if superdelegates decide the nomination! |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM by BluegrassDem
And she is a SD herself (uncommitted). Denver's gonna be a bloodbath if the SD's pick the nominee, especially if it goes against the committed delegates. She's not alone either. There's gonna be a lot of people quitting the party if some shenaningans go on backstage in Denver.
|
Mags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
anamandujano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
17. I believe it's spelled "BUH BYE" and I completely agree. |
|
I'm sure Karl Rove will find a spot for her in his party.
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
2. And a lot of young voters who will leave as quickly as they came. |
Blue_State_Elitist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. Not convinced they would vote in significant numbers in the general anyway. |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
If Obama got the nomination, I am sure they would. If Clinton got the nod, I would hope they would be active and loyal, but who knows? If it's decided by superdelegates, and it's not Obama?
Forget it.
|
slick8790
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
As a member of this "youth" that everyone bags on so much, I can tell you that Obama is getting people excited to vote democratic. Clinton is turning people off. Don't ask me why, it's just what i see.
|
debatepro
(683 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
32. It's called a claim... |
|
Your missing the data...
I mean they will caucus for hours on end but not vote in the general election.
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Original message |
More unity from the Obama camp |
|
You don't like superdelgates, MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T BE ONE.
Oh, wait, that only works if it means an Obama win.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well, yes, that would be quite the loss, given her string of amazing successes |
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Original message |
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Everybody, chant with me! Jump! Jump! Jump! |
|
I agree with you mondo. :patriot:
|
Mags
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. That is so funny and true! |
golddigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
racaulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Dean does NOT want this party to split -- do you think they will do something |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. well, unless someone has the required number |
|
going into Denver, there will be shennanigans behind the scenes. just how do you think this works? how do you get committed delegates to switch?
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Donna Brazile is a Democrat? |
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. Hey! I was going to use that line! |
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Blue_State_Elitist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Nailzberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Well, that might just make the whole convention worth it. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
13. But what if Obama has more committed delegates |
|
but Clinton leads in the popular vote?
|
Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. A Cold Civil War I suppose. |
debatepro
(683 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Just like in the GE...
Besides... the rules for aquiring pledged delegates were known to both parties... if the strategy is popular vote... then Obama wouldn't have spent his resources trying to get extra delegates in some odd congressional districts he campained in.
In this case... team obama knows the rules and they are playing better than the clintons... this is why team obama knows they one the delegate count on super tuesday before the MSM... Kudos to team obama's operations.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
is what Superdelegates SHOULD do if they can decide the result.
Why should they follow the pledged delegates instead of the popular vote?
|
Homer12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Super Delgates are the NON-SMoked filled room |
|
way of fixing the nomination in a non-democratic way.
HYPORCRITES. FUCK YOU DLC.
|
SoxFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
The superdelegate concept predates the DLC by a decade.
|
newmajority
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I never thought I would say this, but Donna Brazile is right. |
|
:wow: let me get over the shock of saying that for a second :wow:
OK, now as I was saying, she's right. It will be a bloodbath. Same thing if Hillary gets away with the Michigan/Florida scam.
The frontloaded primaries are already disenfranchisement enough, with most of the country only having 2 candidates to pick from, and some not even being that "lucky". If even that limited choice is taken away from the people, they aren't going to like it.
|
Missy M
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Wow, could we possibly be that lucky..... |
|
I sure hope she holds to her promise. I, for one, wouldn't be sad to see her go.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Isn't Donna Brazille a Clintonite? |
|
Does this mean if Obama prevails that all the Clinton supporters will quit the Party and vote for McCain in the general election? It seems to go down that road. So much for party unity.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
26. Well you know that the party is split |
|
and many Obamites will NOT vote for Hillary...and many Clintonites will NOT vote for Obama. We can all thank the PPP (perpetual primary process).
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
sfam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
56. YES, she most certainly is. |
|
Although if she appears neutral, she gets to keep her spot in the limelight.
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Now there's a reason to let the superdelegates decide if I ever heard one. |
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. If superdelegates decide this, lots of democrats will quit the party not just her |
|
Shes voicing what alot of other democrats are saying. And shes voicing it out in the media. I don't blame her. If superdelegates decide the nominee, I won't vote for either one in the election. Let the people have their say NOT the politicians. If this happens then democracy doesn't mean a fucking thing and your vote doesn't matter anyway.
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. You can't try to change the rules once the game has started. |
|
The superdelegates exist for a reason.
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
31. But the superdelegates should go with who their constituents want not what they themselves want |
|
Isn't the point to represent the people? not themselves?
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
38. That is not the role or point of superdelegates. |
|
They can choose to do that, as Barbara Boxer has, but their vote is their vote - hence the "super" part.
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. Well I don't think it will come to that |
|
More likely is they'll seat the FL and MI delegates or have caucuses in those states before the superdelegates get a chance. Thats what I think.
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. The superdelegates always vote, so I am not sure what this is all about. |
|
Some of them do not even have a constituency to answer to. Hopefully MI & FL will hold new Primary elections and their delegates will be seated.
|
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
45. Yeah - to remove democracy from the Democratic Party. |
|
They want to ensure the nominee is chosen in smoke-filled rooms by party elites, and have a way to override the popular vote.
If you have a more plausible reason, let's hear it.
|
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
47. Do you even know the history of superdelegates? |
|
This is not "smoke filled rooms" ... why don't you do some research before you make these wild claims.
|
newmajority
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
48. Unless you're DLC hacks in Florida & Michigan |
|
Then you can ignore the rules and Hillary will pretend they don't exist.
|
UALRBSofL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
42. It's pretty obvious this isn't a typical election cycle |
|
With a woman and an AA in the race I can see gender/race being a major issue and then who knows what could happen?
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
25. If the will of the people is overridden by |
|
the party bosses, there will be big problems for the Democrats. I know I will be screaming at the top of my lungs.
Is quitting the best solution? I don't know -- What other recourse do we have when the leadership dismisses the will of the rank and file.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
30. Hm, is the will of the people overriden when we do not seat delegates from FL? |
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
52. HRC is being disingenuous with this argument. |
|
But yes, I will be pissed if those delegates are the margin that decides the nomination, seated or not. The only solution I can see is to have an actual campaign in FL and MI followed by a primary or caucus.
|
kstewart33
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
BigDDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bless her DLC triangulating heart.
|
lastliberalintexas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Threatens or PROMISES? |
|
Will she also take Carville and Begala with her? Maybe we could pay them?
|
SaveOurDemocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
49. I will too, they are undemocratic and disgusting |
TeamJordan23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
51. Agree. They will ruin the Dem party if they don't follow the pledged delegates. nm |
Tropics_Dude83
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I could load my post up with expletives but I won't because it will get deleted. My CAPS is not to try to dominate the argument but to emphasize my RAGE. FIRST DU SAYS TEDDY KENNEDY IS A DINO, THEN JOHN KERRY IS A DINO, THEN CLAIRE MCKSASKILL IS A DINO. THESE ARE THE LEADERS OF OUR PARTY!! DONNA BRAZILLE SAVED AL GORE'S CAMPAIGN IN 2000 AND WON THE POPULAR VOTE FOR US.
HOW DARE YOU GUYS SO GLIBLY SAY GOOD BYE TO ONE OF THE LEADERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. HOW F***ING DARE YOU!! HOW F****ING DARE YOU. HOW F*ING DARE YOU!!!
Anybody that doesn't support DU's preferred candidate, HRC, is a DINO I guess. Do any of you have any idea what Brazille, Kennedy, Kerry, Mckaskill have done for our party.
FYI, Donna is not pro-Obama. She, in fact, seems slightly pro Hillary.
How f*ing dare you.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message |
55. Don't let the door hit you on the ass... |
|
Donna, I have lost more elections than I have won, Brazille...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |