Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Donna Brazile threatening to quit the Democratic Party if superdelegates decide the nomination!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:46 PM
Original message
Donna Brazile threatening to quit the Democratic Party if superdelegates decide the nomination!
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM by BluegrassDem
And she is a SD herself (uncommitted). Denver's gonna be a bloodbath if the SD's pick the nominee, especially if it goes against the committed delegates. She's not alone either. There's gonna be a lot of people quitting the party if some shenaningans go on backstage in Denver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. by-by
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I believe it's spelled "BUH BYE" and I completely agree.
I'm sure Karl Rove will find a spot for her in his party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. And a lot of young voters who will leave as quickly as they came.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Not convinced they would vote in significant numbers in the general anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Niether am I.
If Obama got the nomination, I am sure they would. If Clinton got the nod, I would hope they would be active and loyal, but who knows? If it's decided by superdelegates, and it's not Obama?

Forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Absolutely agree.
As a member of this "youth" that everyone bags on so much, I can tell you that Obama is getting people excited to vote democratic. Clinton is turning people off. Don't ask me why, it's just what i see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. It's called a claim...
Your missing the data...

I mean they will caucus for hours on end but not vote in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Original message
More unity from the Obama camp
You don't like superdelgates, MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T BE ONE.

Oh, wait, that only works if it means an Obama win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, yes, that would be quite the loss, given her string of amazing successes
on our behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Original message
lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Everybody, chant with me! Jump! Jump! Jump!
I agree with you mondo. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. That is so funny and true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Ouch...lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. No kidding.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. Ba-ZING!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dean does NOT want this party to split -- do you think they will do something
to guard against that?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Quit anyway Donna!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. well, unless someone has the required number
going into Denver, there will be shennanigans behind the scenes. just how do you think this works? how do you get committed delegates to switch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Donna Brazile is a Democrat?
Who knew?

:shrug:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Hey! I was going to use that line!
LOLOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. GMTA
:hi:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Peace out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, that might just make the whole convention worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. But what if Obama has more committed delegates
but Clinton leads in the popular vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. A Cold Civil War I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Delegates decide...
Just like in the GE...


Besides... the rules for aquiring pledged delegates were known to both parties... if the strategy is popular vote... then Obama wouldn't have spent his resources trying to get extra delegates in some odd congressional districts he campained in.

In this case... team obama knows the rules and they are playing better than the clintons... this is why team obama knows they one the delegate count on super tuesday before the MSM... Kudos to team obama's operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. The question
is what Superdelegates SHOULD do if they can decide the result.

Why should they follow the pledged delegates instead of the popular vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Super Delgates are the NON-SMoked filled room
way of fixing the nomination in a non-democratic way.

HYPORCRITES. FUCK YOU DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. You mean DNC
The superdelegate concept predates the DLC by a decade.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. I never thought I would say this, but Donna Brazile is right.
:wow: let me get over the shock of saying that for a second :wow:

OK, now as I was saying, she's right. It will be a bloodbath. Same thing if Hillary gets away with the Michigan/Florida scam.

The frontloaded primaries are already disenfranchisement enough, with most of the country only having 2 candidates to pick from, and some not even being that "lucky". If even that limited choice is taken away from the people, they aren't going to like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wow, could we possibly be that lucky.....
I sure hope she holds to her promise. I, for one, wouldn't be sad to see her go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Isn't Donna Brazille a Clintonite?
Does this mean if Obama prevails that all the Clinton supporters will quit the Party and vote for McCain in the general election? It seems to go down that road. So much for party unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Well you know that the party is split
and many Obamites will NOT vote for Hillary...and many Clintonites will NOT vote for Obama.
We can all thank the PPP (perpetual primary process).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
53. No
she's supporting Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
56. YES, she most certainly is.
Although if she appears neutral, she gets to keep her spot in the limelight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now there's a reason to let the superdelegates decide if I ever heard one.
Bye Bye Brazile!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. If superdelegates decide this, lots of democrats will quit the party not just her
Shes voicing what alot of other democrats are saying. And shes voicing it out in the media. I don't blame her. If superdelegates decide the nominee, I won't vote for either one in the election. Let the people have their say NOT the politicians. If this happens then democracy doesn't mean a fucking thing and your vote doesn't matter anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. You can't try to change the rules once the game has started.
The superdelegates exist for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. But the superdelegates should go with who their constituents want not what they themselves want
Isn't the point to represent the people? not themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. That is not the role or point of superdelegates.
They can choose to do that, as Barbara Boxer has, but their vote is their vote - hence the "super" part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Well I don't think it will come to that
More likely is they'll seat the FL and MI delegates or have caucuses in those states before the superdelegates get a chance. Thats what I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. The superdelegates always vote, so I am not sure what this is all about.
Some of them do not even have a constituency to answer to.
Hopefully MI & FL will hold new Primary elections and their delegates will be seated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. Yeah - to remove democracy from the Democratic Party.
They want to ensure the nominee is chosen in smoke-filled rooms by party elites, and have a way to override the popular vote.

If you have a more plausible reason, let's hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Do you even know the history of superdelegates?
This is not "smoke filled rooms" ... why don't you do some research before you make these wild claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. Unless you're DLC hacks in Florida & Michigan
Then you can ignore the rules and Hillary will pretend they don't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. It's pretty obvious this isn't a typical election cycle
With a woman and an AA in the race I can see gender/race being a major issue and then who knows what could happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. If the will of the people is overridden by
the party bosses, there will be big problems for the Democrats. I know I will be screaming at the top of my lungs.

Is quitting the best solution? I don't know -- What other recourse do we have when the leadership dismisses the will of the rank and file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Hm, is the will of the people overriden when we do not seat delegates from FL?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. HRC is being disingenuous with this argument.
But yes, I will be pissed if those delegates are the margin that decides the nomination, seated or not. The only solution I can see is to have an actual campaign in FL and MI followed by a primary or caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good for her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. buh bye
take care!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'll miss her.
Bless her DLC triangulating heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. Threatens or PROMISES?
Will she also take Carville and Begala with her? Maybe we could pay them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
44. Buh Bye ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. I will too, they are undemocratic and disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Agree. They will ruin the Dem party if they don't follow the pledged delegates. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
54. HOW DARE YOU?
I could load my post up with expletives but I won't because it will get deleted. My CAPS is not to try to dominate the argument but to emphasize my RAGE. FIRST DU SAYS TEDDY KENNEDY IS A DINO, THEN JOHN KERRY IS A DINO, THEN CLAIRE MCKSASKILL IS A DINO. THESE ARE THE LEADERS OF OUR PARTY!! DONNA BRAZILLE SAVED AL GORE'S CAMPAIGN IN 2000 AND WON THE POPULAR VOTE FOR US.

HOW DARE YOU GUYS SO GLIBLY SAY GOOD BYE TO ONE OF THE LEADERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. HOW F***ING DARE YOU!! HOW F****ING DARE YOU. HOW F*ING DARE YOU!!!

Anybody that doesn't support DU's preferred candidate, HRC, is a DINO I guess. Do any of you have any idea what Brazille, Kennedy, Kerry, Mckaskill have done for our party.

FYI, Donna is not pro-Obama. She, in fact, seems slightly pro Hillary.

How f*ing dare you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. Don't let the door hit you on the ass...
Donna, I have lost more elections than I have won, Brazille...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC