Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seattle Times endorses Obama citing his opposition to the Iraq war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:39 PM
Original message
Seattle Times endorses Obama citing his opposition to the Iraq war
After seven years of George Bush's failed presidency, after five years of unnecessary war in Iraq, America is ready to write a new narrative. All candidates favor the now-bromidic slogan: change. Only one candidate truly embraces the yearnings this word represents.

The Seattle Times endorses Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for president. He has the grasp, temperament and skills to right our standing in the world. He has broad insight and specific ideas to assuage our own hardworking citizens' fears of an economy turning sour...

Judgment is more important. Bush's decision to invade Iraq was the most-wrongheaded decision of our time. Voters this time have reason to focus on other qualities, such as the courage to tell people things they might not want to hear. Obama, for example, took his pitch for higher fuel-efficiency standards to the most-challenging audience, Detroit.

And in October 2002, when our country was horribly bruised by Sept. 11, he came out against the war in Iraq: "I don't oppose all wars. ... What I am opposed to is a dumb war. ... What I am opposed to is a rash war."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2004145661_obamaed27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't support the war.
Can I be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. I was opposed to the war and not a Senator too. Will they endorse me? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Then why are you supporting for Hillary?
It does not compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Because I don't do pep rallies, trends, and naive hope.
Hillary wants to end the war just like everyone else does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Then why'd she vote for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. she was for it....before she was against it
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm guessing the same about her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. exactly.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
56. So she could try to end it. Start a war then work to end it.
???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. "We've been in Korea for 50 years" Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. No she doesn't ..she feeds
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 07:10 PM by zidzi
you lies 'cause she knows that's what the majority want to hear. Her record doesn't stand up for anything except feeding the military complex machine. hilary has no courage and no leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
57. yeah after popular opinion told her that's what
Dems wanted. She was silent up until she decided to run for POTUS and when pressed said the war had been managed wrongly, not that it was wrong from the start. Or then the spin changed to if I'd known then, what I know now or the American people understand my position, or I was deceived or IWR was not a vote for war (like hell it wasn't)... spin, spin, sin (typo intended).

On the war, she's the emperor with no clothes and she's full of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Maybe, maybe not.
But you can vote for the Democratic candidate who didn't.

Is the Iraq war/occupation that important to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Absolutely
but obviously not as important as it is to you or Obama. You guys just care more and count more than idiots like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. To be honest, it is THE ISSUE to me.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 07:55 PM by arewenotdemo
And when Barack Obama says that he "wants to change the mindset that got us into the war", I totally believe him.

Hillary labels his willingness to have a dialogue with Chavez and Castro as "naive". She will never have the courage or brilliance to challenge, must less change, American foreign policy. She likes "coercive diplomacy". No change there. We all know what that means...bombs and more bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. How red herring ..to explain your
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 07:11 PM by zidzi
candidate who has no courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've given up on newspaper endorsements
Cuz they helped in Cali so much. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hey we got a good lot of delegates in cally, took Oakland, San Fran, and the state capital
every little bit helps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. We took those California Spots!!
That makes me HAPPY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. What I find highly amusing
is Obama is running on being the candidate of the future but the only real thing he can point to is in the PAST he was against the war. Presently he FUNDS the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8.  And Your candidate has blood on her hands.
Yeah he funded it so solders wouldn't be without the supplies they needed. Whos the one who supported the war that killed thousands of soldiers lives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. There's money to bring the
solders home. Why fund it? He has NO idea how he would have voted had he been on the hot seat in the Senate and actually had to vote. Probably PRESENT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. you can continue to "triangulate" and "speculate" about what Obama
"would have done". The only concrete thing that we do know is that Hill voted for it. You can't change the past, or the meaning of what "is" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I'm not trying to change things....
I leave it to you obama supporters to do that. For a candidate all about the future he sure doesn't have much to say about anything but the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. and Hill's "past" voting record doesn't portend what she might do
in the future? I think he's right on topic, and apparently the American people think so too, which is why he raised a whopping $32 mil in a month, and $2.2 mil in 24 hrs? I'm sure would love for him to shut up about the "past".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. the american children might....
but what do they know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. funny...that's what i've said about Hill supporters (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. Touche!
Supporting the troops once they're in harm's way is not the same as

Voting the put them in harm's way needlessly in the first place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. doesn't change the fact that he didn't vote for the IWR, and the
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 06:51 PM by Tarheel_Dem
American people know that. And what I find more amusing is that on the eve of every contest, she finds a reason to "choke up" when the cameras are rolling. Just Sickening....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah...........
of course he didn't vote for it dipshit he wasn't in the Senate. You can't take credit for a vote you couldn't make.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. instead of sitting here arguing for your amoral candidate, shouldn't
you be going door to door with a collection can? You keyboard commandoes crack me up. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Actually I've been selling photos of Obama to raise money....
I only get a penny a piece, but what the hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. wow...you must live in a crap neighborhood...
:rofl: Obama's website can't keep up with the demand, and the bonus is that everything's Made In the USA. You poor Hillary folk....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. If they knew the real hilary they wouldn't
fall for it. Somebody choking up with the clintons' record shouldn't stir anyone to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. That is false, he has cited his work on ethics reform, support of SCHIP, women's health care in IL
increasing Pell Grants, improvements to the Higher Education Act, etc... and I could find about 50 more in an hour. If you want to not support him fine, but I suggest doing so in a way that wouldn't require abandoning the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Maybe he should have reformed his ethics....
instead of doing a land deal with a thug.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. Maybe you could stop acting like Karl Rove and tell the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Incorrect.
Obama presently votes against funding with the absence of a time line and will continue to do so until he's voted Commander-in-Chief, and will bring them home.

Clinton, on the other hand, says that once elected she'll think about it for 60 days and, lets face it, probably won't do shit to bring them home. Just like Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. spin spin.......
now what did Senator Clinton really say about those 60 days? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. She said she'd use the time to develop a plan.
So much for being ready on the first day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. You can't make a definitive plan for something that far away
when it's a war, the generals in the field have to make an assessment for the conditions at the time. But you know that. I'm just so sure Obama would start bringing troops home on day one.....NOT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I think Obama would bring the troops home.
If Clinton gave a shit she wouldn't have sent them off to die in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. His greatest claim to fame
is a vote he couldn't make.....and something he admitted he didn't really know what he would have done if he actually had made the vote. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. w00t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. My folks live in Bellingham. My dad said he doesn't vote in the primaries.
I wonder if they'll vote in this one though. I suspect if he does, he'll vote Clinton. Not sure about mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. He stuck his neck out to oppose the war when it wasn't popular to do so,
despite how some have twisted his statements. *coughBillClintoncough*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Media consolidation
I'm glad they got this in

Obama speaks eloquently about media issues. His positions encourage a public worried about a consolidated media. He supports network neutrality and laments media consolidation. He co-sponsored a bill to stop recent changes to the cross-ownership rule adopted by the Federal Communications Commission. Obama says he would appoint FCC commissioners who will work in the public's interest and against media concentration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Zing go the strings of
my heart! Thank you, Seattle Times!

"Judgment is more important. Bush's decision to invade Iraq was the most-wrongheaded decision of our time. Voters this time have reason to focus on other qualities, such as the courage to tell people things they might not want to hear. Obama, for example, took his pitch for higher fuel-efficiency standards to the most-challenging audience, Detroit.

Obama has the courage of conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Did you notice in the Los Angeles debate, zidzi?
When they were talking about violence on television and children, he made a point of turning to the audience and saying the industry had to take responsibility and self-correct, something like that. I was clapping. He does it in the belly of the beast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. NO... thanks! I don't watch the
debates..they drive me nuts(self-preservation)..so thanks for valuble info, WesDem!

Obama is so amazingly courageous, if he can just have time to reach more people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. so true...Thom Hartmann said as much today. Obama just has to
stay out there, connecting with the people, because when he shows up in person he usually erases the gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. Then thank you, Thom Hartman, and
thanks to you, Tarheel, for telling us that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. Seattle belongs to Obama
Epicenter of Gen X.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. They know..and I'm so glad
they do!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. "muted voice on Iraq in Senate"
www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-obama_senate_recordjun12,1,4414390.story

snip

Throughout his time in the Senate, Obama has followed a cautious path, avoiding any severe political bruises. Even before the national mood was turning on Iraq, Obama was a critic of the war, but for most of his time in the Senate he was not a strong voice in opposition. Similarly, the former civil rights attorney and University of Chicago law lecturer did not take to the bully pulpit to speak out publicly on judicial appointments. His strategy called for him to turn away from the cameras when he might otherwise have been a resonant voice.

snip

Muted voice on Iraq

Obama the candidate for U.S. Senate spoke out forcefully against the Iraq war. For most of his tenure in Washington, though, Obama the U.S. senator has not been a moving force on Iraq.

He left it to others to lead public opinion. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) emerged as the strongest voices against the war. Those critics all spoke out before Obama gave his first major policy speech on the war -- 11 months after he took office.

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. And??? Ms. Clinton can't lead the charge? Oh, I forgot she voted
for the bloody war. Moving On...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
59. Hillary will be in Seattle tomorrow, Obama the next day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC