What's with the fear of voters seeing Hillary's biography?

[bigtree]

from posters here?

[maddiejoan]

1. They might watch it

and start to like her.

[neutron]

2. She was quite an Activist

people will be pleasantly surprised.

[golddigger]

3. From all the Clinton post bashing I have seen so far, they are to busy having a circle jerk...n/t

[Deja Q]

Equal time for other candidates. Are Obama, Huckabee, and McCain given equal time?

Given their epithet "MSRNC", at least two candidates - in theory - would...

[jlake]

6. They always show McCain's bio after Hillary's.

[sandnsea]

14. McCain gets one too

This was on the other day and McCain's came on after Hillary's. Clever huh? They know the right will scream about bias, but don't give a shit about the grassroots of the Democratic Party.

[rodeodance]

4. I hope the LIMIT # of posts/per poster goes into effect soon!!

[Blue State Bandit]

5. Because it's a borderline illegal campaign contribution!

[AX10]

11. The media's free ride to Obama...

is the most illegal campaign contribution one can get!

[KittyWampus]

7. bigtree, I hope it's not the biography I saw a couple of years ago. Very unflattering

at least it didn't delve into the inane Vince Foster crap.

[bigtree]

12. It's HORRIBLE!

I wouldn't worry about that biased rag making any influence on the race

[Glimmer of Hope]

8. She is getting free air time and her opponent isn't. This isn't fair especially

if the biography portrays her positively. (I have no idea if it does.)

[bigtree]

16. It's more of an opportunity for the network to rehash their old biased take

on the Clintons. I'm not especially impressed by it.

[pinkpops]

9. How do you "see" a biography?

[bigtree]

13. ooh, a stickler!

do you hate it when folks say 'aint'?

[HughMoran]

10. Because she's an amazingly intelligent and talented liberal activist

...and people might have trouble hating her if they knew the actual facts about her.

[wintersoulja]

29. or if they meet her actual personal friends

and find out what sort of arch conservative ultra rich Wal-Mart heirs the Clintons consort with.
Fortunately, few people will have that experience. Unfortunately, I have.
Total scumbags.

[blm]

15. It doesn't include the constant protection of BushInc, Jackson Stephens, Dubai

and Saudi royals, et al.

[bigtree]

17. no. That can't be found ANYWHERE except on the pages of a few partisans on the web.

[blm]

18. Yeah - Parry is a partisan....o, BTW...what's this ?

Documents that NEVER Really happened?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2836046&mesg_id=2836046

[bigtree]

19. more web fun

good luck with that.

[blm]

21. OK - you want to go ON RECORD and say that reporters like Parry and Gary Webb

have been WRONG all along? You think it was all just web fun for them?

You all have gotten to the point that you will DENY what Bush was doing just because you know damn well that the only reason he wasn't pursued for his crimes was because Bill Clinton did not further any of the investigations or direct accountability through his justice department.

[bigtree]

22. I think they're working hard to apply whatever Bill Clinton may have done to Hillary

I think the entire effort stinks. I don't deny ANYTHING Bush did, so that's just a desperate smear. I deny that Bill Clinton is directly responsible for any of that. I'm not in the business of taking Bush's crimes and abuses and casting the blame on our Democrats.

And, as I've told you before, Clinton's Justice Dept., under Reno, wasn't really under his direct control. And, his administration was more concerned with focusing on advancing the solutions to the needs and concerns of average Americans than in raking up the muck from the last presidency.

[blm]

27. Baloney - She CAN'T open ANY books now because of Bill's role then and even now

as he's collecting millions of dollars from the very same people who ESCAPED further scrutiny thanks to his 'moving past' matters of Poppy Bush's illegal operations that sure did come back to HAUNT this nation on 9-11.

[bigtree]

28. really?

I can't help but recall all of the 'facts' which were swirling around the republican's decade-long innuendo campaign against the Clintons that peaked with their hollow impeachment of the two-term Democratic president.

Tell you what . . . If he's done something wrong then there should be SOMEONE out there who will prosecute. If there are ethics violations or crimes which involve Hillary Clinton, her Senate should be able to raise these points of yours (and your journalists) in an inquiry, to effect her censure . . . and impeachment. :eyes:

[Yossariant]

20. Demonization of Hillary Clinton by cult must prevail.

"You're either wih us or you're with the terrorists."

[Blue-Jay]

23. I dunno.

I haven't seen anyone suggesting that.

[bigtree]

24. I smell fear in these repeated posts protesting this cheap, biased biography

naked fear.

[Blue-Jay]

25. Olfactory sensations aside, what are you talking about?

I really haven't seen any large number of posts regarding Sen Clinton's biography.

[bigtree]

26. okay