Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN is biased towards the Clintons. MSNBC is biased towards Obama.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:43 PM
Original message
CNN is biased towards the Clintons. MSNBC is biased towards Obama.
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 10:49 PM by hiaasenrocks
All of this talk of media bias reminds me of the way fans of any given sports team view the refs.

Watch any game in any sport and if the home team has a foul or penalty called on them, the home team fans will boo like crazy. If the visiting team suffers the same fate, the fans will cheer and clap. Of course, this is all objective right? Fans will readily admit, each time, that their guy committed the foul. Right? OK, wrong.

When you're rooting for a team (candidate) you are going to agree with the refs (media) when they make a call you agree with, and you agree with the call because it went your team's way.

The same is true with this media bias bullshit, whether it's coming from supporters of one or the other of our Democratic candidates, or whether it's the incessant complaining of media bias that we hear from the right-wing. If anything, there's a bias towards sensationalism, not a particular candidate or ideology.

It is all about perspective.

When Newt Gingrich says the media has a liberal bias, he is correct from where he sits on the far right. When someone from, say, The Nation magazine, accuses the media of having a conservative bias, they are correct from where they sit on the left.

It is all about perspective.

Unless someone can show me a completely objective analysis -- with a wide range of examples, none of this fallacy of dramatic instances -- I'm calling b.s. on the "bias" whiners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. And both are biased by trying to make a shit-ton of money. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They are for-profit corporations. I don't even know if we can consider them
news organizations anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. They all sat on their asses...
and did no investigative reporting in the lead up to war with Iraq...and that isn't BS.

The media is full of corporate whore Repubs and DLCers... one in the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are they cheerleading for the war now?
Again, that's the bias towards sensationalism, not a particular candidate or ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. IF that's true, and if it's true that Clinton is thinking of canceling an MSNBC
debate, we can expect this to become even more so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I didn't say it (the bias) was true.
Did you only read the title?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sorry - I didn't mean to indicate that I though YOU said it was true, just if
the general meme is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think so. CNN is barely slightly less stridently biased towards Obama
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 11:13 PM by robbedvoter
Non-partisan group finds huge media bias against Senator Clinton.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4406175&mesg_id=4406175


Since mid-December, when the presidential candidates turned their full attention to the Iowa caucuses, Sen. Barack Obama has led the race for good press and Sen. Hillary Clinton has lagged the farthest behind. From Dec 16 through Jan 27 five out of six on-air evaluations of Obama (84%) have been favorable, compared to a bare majority (51%) of evaluations of Mrs. Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton News Network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC