Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:52 PM
Original message |
With Bush "endorsing" Hillary Clinton it makes we wonder if the two families have a deal worked out |
|
First, Bill covers for GHW Bush's scandals then GW Bush covered for Clinton. So now I'm wondering if Bush "endorsing" Clinton vs. Obama isn't a matter of quid pro quo. He knows McCain will cover him and I think he thinks Clinton would too. On the other hand, he might be a little worried about Obama
BFEE and the Clinton family are just a little too close for my comfort and it's really, really weird for Bush to get into the Clintons' corner.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Birds of a feather, flock together. |
UALRBSofL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They do, did you not get the memo? |
Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well, he didn't endorse HRC so much as he attacked Obama and defended Bill. |
|
But it got me thinking...
Would anyone like to find a video or transcript of Bush's interview of Fox? I know, I know....
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It's this Clinton's turn to let another Bush off the hook. |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-10-08 03:54 PM by AtomicKitten
It will be business as usual.
|
NastyRiffraff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Bush endorsed McCain. Period |
|
What he said about Bill didn't come close to "endorsing" Hillary. He didn't even address policies; he only said that Bill wasn't a racist and he had a right to campaign for his wife; both true. (Even a stopped clock...)
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. No, he "endorsed" party unity. Didn't even say his name. |
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Post the link where Bush actually said he endorses Hillary? |
bunnies
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
7. one-world government. Love it or leave it. nt |
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
more shit smearing from the fuckwits.
|
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Saying that he doesn't believe Bill is a racist, is endorsing HRC? |
|
you must be reading minds. BTW, how do you account for him rallying the GOP to support their candidate
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Bill protected Bush1, Hillary was set up to protect Bush2. Bushes TRUST Clintons |
|
to protect their secrecy and privilege. http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.htmlThat protection throughout the 90s led directly to Bush2, 9-11 and this Iraq war.
|
hill08
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They will let Hillary win in November? Maybe that's another reason to nominate her?
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. B&C, I made the mistake of jokingly using the word "endorse" with relation to |
|
Shrub to Clinton when I first got here to DU and was pillaried in the town square. Maybe you'll have better luck.
:hide:
|
gulliver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Yeah, Bush is talking nice about Clinton cuz he wants to help her. |
|
And Rove was repeating Hil talking points against Obama too. Cuz Rove is trying to help Hillary win the primary.
And the comet is on it's way, so get your sneakers on. Clap if you believe in fairies.
|
blues90
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I look at it differently , I think this is a ploy |
|
Bush sides with Clinton and I'm not even certain this is true but say it is . With most of the country hating bush and he backs Hillary which may send votes to Obama . If this happens they may feel Obama my be torn apart by McCain and then McCain could win. You know damn well bush does not want a Dem to win .
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Bush didn't endorse Clinton. |
Control-Z
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Isn't it against DU rules |
|
to post this kind of shit?
|
Bread and Circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Bush went to bat for Clinton, it makes me wonder why.
We don't have a nominee yet. Both candidates are fair game for fair criticism until we have a nominee.
|
golddigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Rezko trial in two weeks...eom! |
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-10-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss! |
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message |
21. to me, what this means is that Hillary and Bush have an understanding . . . |
|
that should she win, she will not pursue Bush and Cheney for the myriad of crimes they committed against the Constitution, U.S. law, and international law . . . and since Obama has said that Bush has done nothing impeachable, the sad fact is that the Democratic candidate, if elected, is willing to ignore the crimes of the most criminal administration in our nation's history . . .
actually, it's more than a sad fact -- it's a complete disgrace that SHOULD disqualify either of them from consideration for president . . .
and if neither is willing to pursue Bush for his many crimes and misdemeanors, whichever one of them is elected will feel free to act just as illegally, just as unethically, and just as immorally as Bush . . . ya think either of them will void Bush's signing statements? . . . or his directives on illegal spying and on torture? . . . why aren't the candidates talking about this? . . .
because they don't intend to do anything about it . . . because they're all part of the same club -- and they watch each other's back . . .
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |