Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wisconsin very well may be Clinton's firewall.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:21 PM
Original message
Wisconsin very well may be Clinton's firewall.
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 07:24 PM by Drunken Irishman
It's her last chance to thwart Obama's momentum heading into the Ohio and Texas primaries. If she can't do it there, it could be very difficult for her to win either Ohio and Texas.

If Obama wins Virginia, Maryland and DC tomorrow, then carries Hawaii and Wisconsin, that will be a total of 9 primaries/caucuses in a row he's won since Super Tuesday. I'm not sure, even with all the advantages she has with Ohio and Texas, it will be enough to overcome what Obama will have built in the entire month of February. And that's key, because if Obama sweeps all of February, that is going to be the dominant news story throughout the rest of the month heading into March. Now is it possible for Clinton to overcome this? Sure it is, IF she wins in Wisconsin. But a loss there may cripple her campaign to the point where she won't be able to win either Ohio or Texas.

Not to pour it on, but this is how I see it. I think ultimately Clinton's firewall will become Wisconsin and if she can't win there, it's very likely she is done. If she does manage a win in Wisconsin, which is still entirely possible, things will get back on track and make this a race again, where you've got to think she has an edge heading into Ohio and Texas. But right now, that's looking more and more less likely to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any polls for Wisconsin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The last one I saw was last week, it had Clinton up 9.
But a lot can change in a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. where? all I see are old ones from december. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I can't remember where.
Someone posted it on DU, but I think it was one of those lesser known polling companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I found it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. That's right. I remember thinking "It's ARG and I don't trust ARG!"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The notorious ARG!
By default: add at least five point to Barack's tally, deduct at least five from Hillary's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good luck -- it's made of cheese
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tweety said this was pro-Clinton area because of blue collar dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The demographics definitely favor her.
But they also did in Maine, as well, and I think Maine is more evidence of a massive shift toward Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Was Maine a caucus? Is WI a caucus or primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Maine was a caucus, WI is a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Be looking for a story from Camp Clinton claiming Obama wants to outlaw cheese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Naw, they're just gonna point out that he's a Bears fan
That'll do it for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Did you know that a lot of African Americans are intolerant?
Of LACTOSE? :shrug:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree that Hillary will pull out all the stops to win WI
This state will have to be her do or die statement just to slow down the Obama train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ohio is going to be a blood bath
I would say all hands on deck to Ohio. That's the state both of them really need to win. The easiest way to do it is with their connections to people like Chatwal and their connection to global outsourcers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think for Clinton, it'll come down to Wisconsin.
And if the Clinton campaign is smart, they'll put everything they have in Wisconsin. Because if they lose there, it's going to look really bad and that type of press could very well sink her in Ohio -- which is a lot like Wisconsin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I keep reading Clinton's farewell instead of Clinton's firewall!
For some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The fact that we're talking about firewalls...
It's my understanding that firewalls just give people more time to escape from the burning building...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Hmmm....wasn't NEW HAMPSHIRE going to be hillary's FIREWALL? WHAT HAPPENED?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. May it crumble into pieces. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. How many firewalls is one candidate allowed to declare per campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I propose a 3 firewall limit per campaign season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. well, you know, Jesse Jackson broke through some firewalls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. She has no advantage in Texas...
I don't know why everyone keeps saying that.

Obama will take TX. Book it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I think you're right, but there sure are a lot of people who stayed at a Holiday Inn Express
who want to give a contrary expert opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I didn't think so at first, but I feel good about Obama's chances there.
The last poll I saw had him down only 10 there and that was last month, before everything swung his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama won MN by a big margin, and WI has a lot in common with MN.
So we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. she can pull it off
especially cuz shes got a new camp. manager. also, Wisconsin is the archetypical middle-american state. I believe this state may have the most trouble being ready for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Of note Jessie Jackson's mo was stopped dead cold in WI in 1988
Jessie Jackson was on a roll until a narrow loss in Colorado was followed by a sound defeat in Wisconsin in 1988.

And no I support Obama and don't think he is Jessie Jackson. I'm not Bill. I just wonder if WI is ready for an African American candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC